All Activity

Accepted. From the clip provided I believe that the people involved were way too quick to shoot Bob Pikeman and I agree with Bob Pikeman's statement of "Your orders were not clearly given (just spamming a bind in chat is not clear)". This is espcially true when he is surrounded by 4 people yelling at him. I also do think that an arrest could have easily been made in this situation as the car was being bodyblocked and he was surrounded under gunpoint too. Also from this clip Bob Pikeman was put at gunpoint at 00:53 and then killed at 00:58 and the rules clearly state "You must have a valid RP reason to kill someone. You may shoot someone if they damage you with a weapon/vehicle. You may not shoot someone because of their physical appearance, faction or simply because they insulted you. You must give someone a verbal or text warning and allow them 10 seconds to respond before escalating the roleplay. Following this warning, you may kill them if they pull out a weapon. Do not bait someone to shoot/RDM you, and do not punch minge or initiate arguments to harass someone."

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Character's name & rank: Außenminister Alhmanic Rothgeb Schröpfer SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:215028615 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): Prime Explain why you were PK'd: As far as I know, it was grief due to numerous arguments, disagreements, and statements that I and the Vizekanzler had over the course of a few months. Why should you be un-PK'd?: I do not believe he took this to the last resort due to me actively trying to work with him multiple times, and him snubbing me each and every time I attempt to work with him. Each time we had a meeting, he assumed that at the next cabinet meeting, I would side with him one hundred per cent. When I did not, he would call me to his office and complain that I wasn't siding with the state. Over and over again, this trend happened. He called me in person and in private, insults which I had been told about, which was our fourth meeting at the time. I told him that insulting ministers and everyone else wouldn't win people over. He told me it would. I then proposed protections for ministers because that would give them leeway with the rest of the state. He got upset and had the Kapo remove me from his office. The most recent argument we had was about him limiting the party and why what he did was considered bad procedure, as well as how the Konsul could challenge that with a Supreme Court case. The Truth and Science Minister also supported me in this matter. He then insulted me. To which I said you need to act professional in private as much as in public, as I told him numerous times. He denied this and then asked how he was acting. I said to him that insulting and cursing others at every turn without being diplomatic is reckless behaviour. I told him it was acting like a retard. He asked me, "Are you calling me a retard." I told him no. You need to act like the Vice Chancellor and be professional; otherwise, you'll start to develop a reputation similar to that of the procurement minister, who is known for yelling at everyone and earning no respect. He said I don't respect him and am now suspended, and that I needed to be removed. Later, he called me to his office and told me to apologise. I told him I would not apologise due to I did not call him a retard. Acting like one and being one are different things. He needs to act like the Vice Chancellor and defend the state to earn respect. He said I have never respected him. Which is not true. I told him numerous times, both in private and in public, that not only could he be one of the longest-serving Vice Chancellors, but he could also be one of the best. All he had to do was defend the state and stop getting into arguments or positions he could not win. To which he stated I was the reason he couldn't win because I have a cabal of ministers waiting to get rid of him. I rejected the accusation because it was utterly false. He proceeded to have me removed from the position until I apologised. This was going to be a legal battle. I attempted to work with him multiple times during his tenure, but he repeatedly refused my help. I do not believe this was a last resort for the reasons listed. I have attempted many, many, many times to work with him, and he has snubbed me every last time. After the sixth attempt to return to the table with him, it became impossible to work with him due to his insults and threats. I was not attempting to get him removed, killed or anything of the sort. My primary goal was to continue in my position as Minister of Foreign Affairs. We have argued a lot that is true, but for no other reason than disagreement on policy and how he talked to other people, which was easily resolvable. Sometimes you can't agree with someone on how they act, but this was a completely one-sided relationship, which I attempted to repair many times. Each time, he refused to listen to me or anyone else when we tried to help him.

No AI generation here, The only assistance I use when writing is Google Docs Auto-Correct.

First off, holy chatgpt.. Second off, your little pixelated IC position has no say in this appeal.. ent) and Major Pikeman (Deputy Chief of the Gendarmerie) 3rd thing, no it doesnt.. He was not involved at all in this scene.. He has no bias. Don't care, nor does it matter.. Formal detainment does not matter, its the fact you were detained..

Denied. This ban was justified considering your actions and recent POs. I'd recommend reading the rules during the remaining time on your ban.

To whom it may concern, I am submitting this statement in my official capacity as Richterpräsident of the Interior Ministry, and as an active witness to the incident involving the detainment and PK of Major Bobb Pikeman, Deputy Chief of the Gendarmerie. I believe there are several key misunderstandings or misrepresentations that need to be addressed regarding the events that transpired, and I would ask those reviewing this appeal to consider the following facts—facts which I personally observed, and which are verifiably documented in a video clip that I have provided. At no point was the vehicle fully stopped. The staff car was in continuous motion—reversing and maneuvering—throughout the incident. No actual detainment took place. Neither myself nor Major Pikeman were pulled from the vehicle, ordered out with sufficient time to respond, nor physically restrained in any capacity. The "order to detain" was delivered casually by a general while he was actively disengaging from the situation and running away. It was not issued in a structured or deliberate manner that warranted immediate lethal escalation. Major Pikeman used voice radio to send a brief transmission—no longer than five words—stating “We’re being detained by the military.” This occurred simultaneously with the alleged “orders” not to use the radio, which were spammed in chat in rapid succession (twice, within a 5-second window). Only one military personnel was within 5 feet, a lieutenant armed with a pistol. The second, enlisted, was over 10 feet away and armed with an MP40. The term “surrounded” or “multiple guns pointed at you” has been used repeatedly, but is simply not reflected in reality. The notion that FearRP was fully established is incorrect. At no point were the vehicle’s occupants—two high-ranking members of the Interior Ministry—clearly stopped, surrounded, or given adequate opportunity to comply before force was used. If FearRP is to be upheld as a standard, it must be established in a reasonable, contextual way—not through rushed or half-formed orders followed immediately by gunfire. Furthermore, neither of us were ever cuffed or officially detained. The moment the radio transmission was made, gunfire erupted. The action was clearly premature, preventing any form of actual roleplay resolution. It is important to emphasize that position matters. Both myself (Richterpräsident) and Major Pikeman (Deputy Chief of the Gendarmerie) hold critical judicial and policing roles in the Innerministry. The precedent being set here—that two senior officials can be killed instantly without formal detainment, based on unclear orders—is deeply concerning and undermines the balance of roleplay between military and judicial structures. Lastly, while I will refrain from accusing anyone of bias directly, it is worth noting that all voices advocating for the PK are military-aligned, and the staff member who approved the PK request is also affiliated with the military. This is not an accusation, but it does represent a significant conflict of interest that should be acknowledged and addressed. This PK was neither handled with clarity nor in accordance with proper escalation protocol. The situation was rushed, over-aggressive, and failed to uphold the standards of immersive, fair, and balanced roleplay. I ask that this appeal be reviewed with the seriousness and impartiality it deserves, and that the footage—as placed below—be viewed in full context. https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/kDB1AtlmfgFcNGOMh?invite=cr-MSxLS0MsNDE4MDg2NzQ5

just a bystander but you were 6 seconds in fearrp also you knew you were under fear rp by 3 men whit guns pointed at your head also you were given verbel and text warning you still radioed in that you were under arrest so you got shot you didnt account for your life so you got excuted for being a dumdass

Your Name: Shoots SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:1:634637750 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): Apology Which staff member banned you?: Virus How long is your ban for?: 1 month and 1 day, 3 weeks and 5 (basically 6) days left. Why were you banned?: Metagame Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: I deserve to be unbanned because of my new understanding of the rules, and my actions which violated them. I deserved to be unbanned due to my willingness to acknowledge my mistake, and correct myself in the future. I do admit that it has been years since I have did a full read through of the rules, specifically the metagame section. When I started playing the server again, the many months ago I did, I failed to take into account that the server rules have grown and changed. With different additions and interpretations being set in stone. I continued to roleplay with this misunderstanding without a second thought. At first, I was going to initiate a dispute against this ban, but, as I read the rules I now understand; I was in violation of metagame rules 1, 3, 3.5, and 3.6. I now read these rules clearly and notice how I was not following them. It was never my intention to commit a serious rule break on the server, I can admit I took this habit of using OOC VC from other people outside of my friend group, as it is a known fact that this is a regular occurrence in the server. I still understand that although commonly done, it is still in violation. Especially in my situation seeing it was including a senior ranking official (NHC) of the server. Through my years of playing on this server, and a related server, Revenant, I have never faced a serious consequence because I have never committed a serious rule break. The most detrimental thing I had on my old record was prop abuse. I am a Prometheus player and wish to keep it this way, it is one of my most favorited pass times and its with a community that I enjoy. I hope I can bring an understand to the UA team, that I understand my wrong-doings, and simply wish to return back to larp and continue my day-to-day on the server as it was before this incident. I am even a previous staff member of both servers. I wish nothing more for this community than for it to grow and for more exciting opportunities to sprout from it. I believe my one mistake here should define me as a dissident to the server or its people. Additional Information: Me and Reverend are roleplayers. This is obvious. We are not minges, we seek to actively engage with the people of this server. We never wished to cause any disturbances, we were simply taking a shortcut. I can promise to the staff team that we were going to meet in game as well, we just took a cheap route to initiate our roleplay. I hope this appeal sits well with everyone, thank you.

I can smell Chattel Von GPT here .. When writing a ban appeal, it is always best to ensure you write it fully yourself, otherwise it comes off as not genuine, anyone can slap a prompt into a ai. We want to know how you have changed, especially in the case of a perma.

Hi, I appreciate you taking the time to write an apology. However, the situation you're describing doesn't match what actually happened. It was not a one-time mistake or a misunderstanding during an arrest. You and another player, who was also banned, were repeatedly killing and messing with the same individual in spawn, while asking strange questions. This behavior is nothing less considered than spawn-killing and RDM. In addition to this incident, you've already been banned twice and received two notes in the past month. Given this, my judgment seems only fair. Take this as a learning experience. I welcome you back when you're unbanned.

Denied. You hit the Interior Minister (member of national high command) in the face with your gun as a low ranking CO and then faced the consequences of your actions.

you know baumer

Your Name: Erwin Muller SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): 76561199728372710 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): Apology Which staff member banned you?: Jakob How long is your ban for?: 1w Why were you banned?: killing someone because they said yes to being a jew Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: Hey admins, I got banned for 7 days for RDM and I just wanted to say I'm sorry. I know I shouldn’t have killed the civilian but he punched me first and kept resisting when I tried to arrest him. I thought it was okay in RP but I guess I messed up. I really like the server and don’t want to wait a whole week to play again. I’ve read the rules again and I understand now that I should’ve handled it differently. I promise I won’t do it again and I’ll be more careful next time. If you could lower the ban time I’d really appreciate it. Thanks for reading this. Additional Information:

You hit the Interior Minister in the face and that then started a gunfight. Nothing much more needed to be said. I'll let another member of Upper Administration decide if this is accepted or not.

Your whole justification for my PK is that I went against your orders. Your orders were not clearly given (just spamming a bind in chat is not clear). Also as I stated before, I began transmitting my message as you were giving said orders. I also feel this is not very genuine RP as you guys shot us both, not just me, which says you didnt intend on even detaining us or wanting to create a further RP scenario. There was no active threat or reason to shoot us other then me transmitting a radio message within the 5 seconds of being ordered to detain us and then shooting us. Im sure if you guys wanted to actually RP with us and detain us you would have waited for us to react properly to your demands. Another thing to mention is that in the clip I only count two people actually aiming weapons at us. This does not seem like enough to make sense that the Richterprasident of the police courts, one of the top leaders in control of a powerful court, and the deputy chief of the gendarmerie to be feared by two random Military aiming guns at us while we are driving in our staff car.

Your response doesn’t align with the server’s FearRP rules or even your own submitted actions. Let’s clarify something critical: we were never pulled out of the vehicle. At the time of the “don’t radio” message, our car was actively reversing and still in motion. FearRP Rule #7 is explicit—FearRP does not apply to individuals inside a moving vehicle. The only time it does is when the vehicle is immobilized, the armed party is within five feet, and orders are clearly issued. None of that applied here. You claim the order to not radio came first—but again, I was in the car with Twister. The message was already being sent when your chat line appeared. There is no cancel function for typed radio—it sends once the Enter key is hit, and when it comes to radio via voice, that is even more perdinant. You did not give the minimum 10 seconds required by General Rule #2 and FearRP Rule #1. You issued one fast-scrolling line of text, while chat was active and cluttered, and fired less than five seconds later. That’s not FearRP—it’s an ambush. You also stated, and I quote, “you can get detained for no reason.” That is a direct violation of FearRP Rule #3, which requires that detainment and FearRP have valid justification. Claiming you don’t need one is openly admitting to powergaming. FearRP cannot be weaponized to force a kill without meeting the proper conditions, and this situation failed those conditions across the board. This was not a lawful detainment or a valid PK—it was a rapid escalation from a passive RP interaction into a rule-bending execution.

Well that is out of the window when you break FearRP and radio when told not to. Absolutely untrue, you can review the clip I submitted to get the character PKed. This applies to like insulting someone OOCly and them detaining you based off of that, realistically in this server you can get detained for no reason. Which at that point you pursue ICly. Yes it was, I clearly stated in chat to stop moving. Alongside another individual stating in chat to not move aswell. Reason to be detained does not have to be provided at all. In conclusion to my response. I will reiterate the fact, 1. The Character was detained and shot for an IC reason. 2. FearRP was properly established by two individuals, and Bobb Pikeman failed to listen to our orders which lead to his untimely death. 3. The Order to not radio in while under gunpoint, was clearly stated before radioing in.

Hello! I was the Gericht member in vehicle with Twister, this is my response to what was stated above by nugget. I was inside the vehicle with Twister during the entire situation, and the PK of his character, Bobb Pikeman, was unjustified under multiple rules regarding FearRP, escalation, and lawful detainment. According to FearRP guidelines, detainment must be based on a valid in-character reason—none was provided. We were complying with an earlier order to leave when, suddenly, a vague command to “detain” was issued with no clear cause, and an officer in the military issued a rushed warning not to radio. While chat was active and overlapping, Twister sent a radio message about our detainment, which was already in progress when that order appeared. Within five seconds, we were fired upon. This violates General Rule #2 and FearRP Rule #1, which both require a visible warning and a minimum ten-second window to comply. We were inside a reversing vehicle, which further limits what could be interpreted as non-compliance—FearRP Rule #7 specifically says it only applies to immobilized vehicles with armed parties within five feet issuing direct orders. That was not the case here. There was no attempt to escalate through non-lethal means or to give us a fair chance to surrender—this was a direct jump from vague detainment to immediate execution, violating Killing Rules #1 and #10. The idea that “none of this matters for a PK” is incorrect—General Rule #18 makes clear that a PK must follow all server rules to be valid. If the FearRP itself was not properly established, the PK cannot stand. I am requesting that the PK be voided, Bobb Pikeman’s character be restored, and that clarification be issued stating that FearRP-based orders must be clearly delivered and followed by an adequate reaction window, especially when the subject is in a vehicle with limited ability to respond.

Hey, I am the individual in the Military that executed the PK, alongside requested it. Let's first pick into this appeal, I gave you specific orders to not radio in as it compromised the secrecy of the detainment of yourself and another individual within the Gericht. After giving you such you proceeded to radio in to you're faction that you were detained which gave me one option to kill you, and end the life of Bobb Pikeman. The 10 second rule stopped applying after you proceeded to radio in against the orders of myself while under gunpoint from myself and other individual within the Military. This resulted in the death of you're character. This does not matter one bit my friend, you're men proceeded to smart-off to the Field Marshal which resulted in him ordering your arrest, which resulted in your death. This also does not matter at all during PKs, you were detained and you broke Fearp. Most of the stuff said in this appeal does not even mean anything for PK appeals. Nor, was this PK handled poorly. There was clear RP done in the situation, and at the end of the situation you refused to comply with my order under fearp which resulted in the untimely demise of Bobb Pikeman.

Character's name & rank: Polizeinspektor Bobb Pikemen SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:294292033 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): Jack Explain why you were PK'd: FearRP Why should you be un-PK'd?: We were outside the ICC asking a Feldjager if they would be interested in transferring. The feldmarshall comes outside the base and tells us to leave which was no problem. We began to leave and got into our car and then the Feldmarshall ordered us to be detained. The military started swarming us, I radio in the Military is detaining us. They then immediately open fire after 5 seconds. One guy apparently had spammed a message in chat saying not to use radio, which I did not see. I also was radioing as he was saying it. I believe there are multiple rules and precedent that you have to give reasonable time for you to react. I also was not alone and inside a vehicle which makes it less justifiable to say I was 'risking my life' by radioing in. Overall this PK was poorly handled and the RP situation was basically over as we were leaving, as the feldmarshall told us to. There was literally no reason to detain us either. This is the clip used to justify the PK: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/kCtaaOLQjOsgJYzfC?invite=cr-MSxWcEEsNzIxNzA1NjU

Thank you for writing an apology. That's a good start, but honestly, it feels like you're downplaying your actions and not fully taking accountability. Saying things like "Only killed 2 people" and defending your reasoning makes it come off like a half apology, half justification. Just because someone from your faction is being detained does not mean you can sit on a roof and gun everyone down. You're expected to engage, roleplay, and assess the situation, not shoot first and ask questions later. Shooting into a crowd, killing people, including your faction member whom you were trying to "rescue" without any interaction, is MRDM. Also, when I pulled you to a sit to discuss the situation, I was not planning on banning you. I was going to educate you on the rules. But when I asked you why you did it, you didn't really give me an answer, and then said something along the lines of "because it was based". This came off as you just blatantly trolling, which escalated the situation to a ban. If you had just explained your side of the story calmly, it would have been a verbal warning or a note at most. I'll let another member of UA decide the verdict of your appeal.

Your Name: Viktor Verruckt SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:1:565673807 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): apology Which staff member banned you?: coffee How long is your ban for?: 1 month Why were you banned?: i opened fire on lapo for kidnapping a feldjager. Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: I am truly sorry for opening fire on the LaPo, and killing 2 of them before retreating, in my defence i thought i was working on valid reasoning as i was told in comms moments earlier by my commanding officer to do what i can to help the poor feldjäger being kidnapped, so i did what i could and things ended this way. Being banned for a month is excessive as shit, i only killed 2 people, the lapo guy in the clip and the feldjäger in the crossfire. my ban was regarded as a mass rdm even though only 2 people lost their lives under my boot. I am truly sorry for any offense this caused the members of the opposing party, and i wish i can still be seen as a positive member of this community if my ban appeal gets accepted. Additional Information: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/kzZjaiLTWpCjESu8N?invite=cr-MSxCVGwsMjAxMzA5NjA2

Character's name & rank: Oberleutnant Ashton Wollfram SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:640041114 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): Prime Explain why you were PK'd: Initiating a gunfight. Why should you be un-PK'd?: I was in a situation where me and 2 other guards were blocking a door from the interior minister entering the BendlerBlock, we argue for about 30 seconds then the Interior Minister begins to tie our guard chief who is an Oberst, I try to stop him from tying our Chief by hitting him with the butt of my gun; with no intentions of killing him, then the Interior Ministers guards then proceeds to open fire on me, resulting in a huge gun fight. Additional Information: Thank you for reading my appeal, I just wanted clarification on how hitting someone is considered initiating a gunfight.