Slug

Hello @TommyLegend Thank you for taking the time to make a PK Appeal. After reviewing the case, we have decided to deny the appeal The clip you provided is no longer available, so I am unable to review that specifically So you admit to driving off while under FearRP. @ItIsÀrishas explained the situation that occurred and how you fell under the FearRP guideline. PKs fall under an "IC" situation. You did not break any rules, but your character did not value their own life and therefore died. They cannot come back from this. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked

Accepted Contact a member of UA when you are next in-game to have your flags reinstated.

You have a very extensive PO history on BOTH of your accounts. Since a lot of these POs from the STEAM_0:1:419694642 account are from 2023 I will give you another chance, but any further offenses will ultimately lead to another permanent ban. Appeal: Accepted Thread: Locked

You have a long history of alt evasion. Let's start with your main account STEAM_0:1:486945364 which was banned on 3/18/24 for "NITRP| PUNCH MINGE | RACISM". Since that ban, you've attempted to alt evade with several accounts: STEAM_0:0:15639198 banned 3/19/24 STEAM_0:0:149537465 banned 3/21/24 STEAM_0:1:97728566 banned 3/27/24 STEAM_0:1:944662000 banned 5/12/25 STEAM_0:1:415711436 banned 8/30/25 STEAM_0:0:417015326 banned 8/30/25 It has nothing to do with the "accounts" breaking the rules, it has to do with the person who owns the accounts. You broke our rules and therefore are not allowed to join our server. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked

Thread has been moved to Ban Appeals Given the evidence provided, I'd say the ban was applied properly, so a dispute is denied. This is not an excuse. You're on our server to roleplay, if you got involved in an RP situation and "couldn't tell" because of a circumstance you put yourself in (having music playing on max-boosted volume) then this is your own fault. This is roleplay. People are detained for nonsense reasons all the time. This is why there is a Ministry of Justice, legal system, etc. It is not against our rules for LaPo to detain someone for no reason. Your last ban was on 7/27, not even a full month ago Even if the officer was an error sign, they stated in voice chat that you J-Walked, your arms became bound with a sound effect, and your character began shuffling towards the officer on their own. Not sure what other conclusion could have been made other than that you were being arrested. As @Noobyexplained, if the RP situation needed to be interrupted so you could install our content the proper path to take would have been contacting staff to get permission to disconnect briefly. Instead, the situation turned into LTARP. I want to try and sympathize with you, but almost every argument given in this appeal is nonsense. The ban is upheld as it is valid and therefore a dispute appeal is denied. Given the situation, you may appeal the ban again at your own discretion, but this time, as an "Apology" appeal. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked

After further review of the clips provided and statements given by both sides of the situation, the UA team will be denying this appeal. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked

Alt evasion is against our rules... Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked

Thank you for the apology Appeal: Accepted Thread: Locked

Given that the original ban was only for 1 week the appeal will be accepted, but, any future bans that result in alt evasion attempts will remain permanent. Appeal: Accepted Thread: Locked

Hi @Trent9000, Thank you for taking the time to make a ban appeal. After further discussion of the ban with @CJ_, and reviewing the clips & arguments presented in this appeal it has been decided that the ban was applied improperly and that no rules were broken during the interaction. Appeal: Accepted Ban: Voided Thread: Locked

@Patrick Tingis correct, this should not be a dispute if ban reason is correct. Additionally, your ban is permanent because you violated Global Rule #11 by using an alternate account to try and evade the ban. That will need to be mentioned in the appeal as well as an apology.

Please do not dispute if its only regarding the ban length. Our staff members have the discretion to ban for the amount of time they deem appropriate. The punishment itself was justified because you broke our rules, so this should only have been an apology appeal. Chat logs indicate you said a bunch of stuff in OOC leading up to the ban, notably in the context of this appeal "what is your guys opinion on nazis", "do you guys not like mommys??", and "major major major major major major major major major major major major major major major major major majormajor majormajor majormajor major major majormajor majormajor steiner major major major major major major he has a pco for you" This all being said, Parzival agrees the ban length may have been a bit harsh, perhaps a note would have been better than a ban. Appeal: Accepted Thread: Locked

While your re-appeal violates our ban appeal guidelines (since @Coffeedid not approve of a re-appeal within the 2 week period) the apology is sincere. You have been warned for the forums violation, but thank you for the apology. Appeal: Accepted Thread: Locked

@Baldwin IV You just don't know when to stop, do you? For the repeated infractions you may not appeal again for at least 6 months

Hello @yourapoop216, I was the approving staff member on your PK, requested by @Patrick Ting Your PK was approved on the basis of the Dirt PK guideline as you were threatening to rat on the KG, making statements such as "Get ready for that witness statement on the kg" and "Arresting me for no reason", "i have proof". As stated in our PK guidelines, "Dirt is any information that can lead to arrest/execution" -- it is generally not a smart idea to threaten the people holding you in an execution room that you are going to turn them in... Further information, screenshots, etc. can be provided if necessary by @Patrick Tingas this was the information I had to go off of for the initial approval. The verdict of this appeal will be decided upon by another member of Upper Administration.