ThirdEye

+1

Hi, I am the staff member that issued your PK You were PK'd under the guideline of FearRP. Here is the clip: https://medal.tv/de?contentId=iLaIDFaBPi7HBqjut&invite=cr-MSx1aGIsMjMwNTAwNzIxLA&spok=d1337KQO3oxl You were surrounded by a group of at least 4 armed individuals who held you at gun point and ordered you to stop moving. You continued to move showing a disregard for your own life and were subsequently shot for it. Thank you for appealing and good luck for your appeal.

Hello, I am the Staff member that issued your ban You were banned for handing out guns to civilians and telling them to shoot up large groups of people, actively telling them to commit MRDM. Here is the clip: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/iLbyMsSyZfup1PYzc/d1337pO6vbxO?invite=cr-MSxtMGwsMTgwMTgyMzk0LA You were reported by a player for this, and the second I teleported to you, you were actively telling a civilian to shoot up a crowd of NSB that were serving a warrant without any RP context. When I asked you in a sit why you were telling civilians to shoot up crowds of people, you lied and hence you were banned. I don't know why you would try to blatantly lie about this in your appeal when you were spectated while telling a civilian to shoot up a crowd of people.

Again, as I stated before, wether or not you intend to kill someone or just knock them out by purposefully running them over in order to arrest them doesn't matter; it is still considered VDM. A police officer doesn't just run people over with his car so that he can then arrest them, there is no rp in there whatsoever. Here is the VDM Guideline for you: You may not run an individual over with your vehicle unless your life is in danger. I.e. the individual(s) are shooting at you or present an immediate life threat. Players who deliberately run towards moving vehicles or show a clear disregard for their own safety by running out into the road and not looking for oncoming vehicles and are then killed as a result would not be classed as VDM. Regarding your other claim that you were the only one being targetted for nitrp, after you weren't on the server anymore the other party general who was also minging was also handled. You weren't the "only one to be targeted with nitrp" you were simply the only one that decided to run someone over when it was completely unnecessary and were therefore banned.

Hello, I am the staff member that issued your ban You were banned for VDM. Here is the clip: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/iDSfLA940p9OZzQAV/d1337uMFRuz2?invite=cr-MSxpbFcsMTgwMTgyMzk0LA I was heading over to the BB as my transfer was just approved so that I could transfer. When I went there, a group of high ranking party and vw co's kept minging near me and using FailRP terms constantly. You were a part of that group. None of you attempted to actually rp with me properly; there was no attempt made to detain me or conduct anything else with me. You were simply minging on higher ranking characters late at night. After your party group had me completely surrounded, you did not detain me even though you had the chance to do so. When I then left and kept going to the BB one party general kept following, me and I made him multiple warnings to back off; however, no gun was pointed at anyone, and there was no actual live threat to any person on the scene. You then decided to run your car directly into me without any proper reason or previous attempt to detain me. You intending to knock someone out by running them over, in order to arrest them is not only illogical but also not a valid reason to actually run someone over.

Hello, I am the Staff member that issued your ban You were banned for VDM, driving a car right into our group when we just moved out to serve a warrant. This wasn't the first time that we got randomly killed, run over by a civilian while we were attempting to serve a warrant that day and were therefore already a bit tired of it. Here is the clip: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/itTHkJMl4oRnHOwwx/d13373XoshBw?invite=cr-MSw0QXQsMTgwMTgyMzk0LA If you had no intensions to run into us then I would understand this appeal more, however you were driving down the entire road and had a clear vision that we were crossing the street on the cross walk, you could've easily avoided running the car into us. Instead you drove right even though we were actively crossing the street. Good luck on your appeal

Hello I am the Staff member that requested the PK on your character, You made a ticket requesting to have a civilian pk'd, because of the civilians request to commit suicide. The civilian agreed to being shot, you were informed that the indivdual is PK active and you then decided to pistol whip the civilian to death, however as you were still shooting at the civs body, your colleague pulled out his pistole killing you. Unlike what TheOblivionist is stating here, I did not just ignore "PK guidelines (last resort, "pking for doing one's legal work)", you must always beaware that whenever you are executing a PK, that you yourself are at risk of being PK'd. Weither or not your colleague killed you on accident, you took the risk of being pk'd in the situation by personally hitting the civilian to death on your own volition. I also did not "violate the PK guidelines" for overviewing the situation, as I wasn't there to overwatch a PK on Denis Spitz, I was there to overwatch the requested Suicide PK on a civilian, while overwatching the PK of the civilian, you yourself died while executing the PK, which opened your own character for a PK, on the PK Guideline of Dying while carrying out a PK. After you were shot by your colleague, a member of the Administration reviewed a clip of the situation and approved this PK. Edit: Before this appeal I have not seen the other perspective of the NSB-Chefinspektor. In the other colleagues perspective it does look like he was attempting to shoot the civilians body and shot you on accident. Because of the new perspective of the situation I just recieved I would personally be more lenient on this PK, as it does seem like you were shot in the crossfire by your superior. I will leave the rest of this appeal up for a member of UA to decide on this appeal.

Hello, I am the Staff Member that issued your ban. You were banned for committing RDM during a trial that was being held and was at its end. Your original ban was a 3 day ban. As stated before by a member of UA, your ban was extended due to you attempting to evade your ban. Please include in your appeal your violation of Global Rule 11.

+1 Has experience and is active in the community

Hello, For clarification you didn't lose any items after (or because) you were shot, you requested to have the mugging voided because I shot you on accident and to be comped for everything mugged off you. I informed you that only UA has the ability to void entire situations, and that I personally do not possess the 4000 DM that you demanded as a compensation.

Hello I am the Staff Member you made a report on, My intension was not to shoot you without reason, but to break your leg and untie you so that I would have some time before you got your NSB colleagues to arrest me. The kill was completely accidental and I was genuinely surprised by your death as you can also tell by my reaction in your clip. After you had died I immediately charcomped you and informed you that I shot you on accident. You had no items in your inventory when you died, the things you are listing here are the things that were mugged off you, you wouldn't have them back even if you did not die. I attempted to have the situation resolved in a sit, you demanded 4000 DM from me for your lost things and I informed you that I don't even possess that many DM on my Staff Char, however I would have been more than ready to get a compensation for all of your things organized, even though you didn't lose them when dying, but instead you insisted on making a Staff Report about this. Making a report about an accidental kill, that could have been easily resolved in a sit seems a bit petty to me.

In this response you are acting like as if it were impossible for you to simply summon me via an advertisement. You had more than 1 thousand options to at least try, but you never even tried to enforce a warrant on me, summon me, or question me. There wasn't even an attempt made. Your first solution was to immediately PK me without any other actual RP coming from you. How do you know that you'd immediately be fired upon when you never even tried to enforce a warrant on me? You receiving some "evidence" (less than a handfull of witness statements) doesn't change the fact, that I never ordered the MOI Raid or escalated the situation in the first place, but that it was the Kaisergarde who opened fire first on the Military outside of the MOI. When on other occasions some lone Marine enlisted decided to raid the MOI, how would that make me responsible when I never gave them the order to do so? Him being an "old, and returning, player" doesn't change the fact, that using outdated NS terminology, in a Imperial document, ruins the entire context of the document. Like for an example if the MGD had a massive case file on the NSB Chief, but in stead of referring to the NSB as NSB, they were constantly referring to it as RSHA in every single document. That would be retarded and it should be agreed upon that documents constantly filled with FailRP terms should be voided and considered OOC.

You might have had more evidence than just the ones in the file, but you did not use the PK as a last resort. You never questioned me, summoned me or even attempted to bring me to court for the things. You could have done so many other things before just going for a PK. However you did not.

+1 He could actually make use of it

I don't know how this could be viewed as heresay, but at the start of the clip the civilian very clearly kills the only other 2 people I was patrolling with. There is only 1 of the in total 3 reports that claims I ordered the detainment of the GSD Chief. One other reports mentions the scene as "The Generalinspektor walks outside of the MOI gates for an unknown reason and is arrested by the military.". It doesn't even mention my name in the scene where the General was detained. And the third report of the case file doesn't even mention the GSD General being detained at all. And as I have said it before, I do not recall ever ordering the General to be detained. And there is only 1 report claiming that I did. So if there is any proof, besides that 1 report, of me ordering the Generals detainment I would like to request to to be posted here. In the rest of your statement you only talk about the history of roleplay and that consequences must follow for my actions. Did I think that there will be no consequences for the way I antagonized them? No, of course not. But this was not used as a last resort as it is stated in the PK Guidelines. I could have been taken to court, I could have been questioned, summoned, as a consequence. No of that occured. Now if the NSB wouldn't have been this lazy in their report writing then I would probably understand this more, if they would for an example have 5-8 reports claiming that I detained the GSD Chief and raided the MOI. But there is like I said only 1 report claiming that I ordered the GSD Chief's detainment, and not a single report claiming that I ordered the Raid on the MOI. 1 In the first report the raid was described as this: "The Military then raided the MOI for absolutely no reason and killed many members of the MOI." 2 In the second report the raid was described as this: "An officer of the Kaisergarde ordered his men to fire if another member of the military attempted to break in. This did happen and the Kaisergarde began opening fire, which warranted a response in-kind from the military. The MOI became under full siege by the military, who almost broke in from each side gate multiple times. The MOI was held and did not come under occupation from the military." 3 In the third report the raid was described as this: "Through Raido they took most of the LAPO and placed them under arrest and then one of them used our radios to tell us to surrender and because there was no broadcast from the other branches to surrender I refused" In none of those reports is my name even mentioned when talking about the raid. Here I agree that you would call for the head a leading figure in this, but then again where is the evidence that I lead a raid on the MOI. None of the reports from the case file mention me leading the raid.