ban appeal

[jopperi]

Your Name: Viktor Verruckt

SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:1:565673807

Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): apology

Which staff member banned you?: coffee

How long is your ban for?: 1 month

Why were you banned?: i opened fire on lapo for kidnapping a feldjager.

Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: I am truly sorry for opening fire on the LaPo, and killing 2 of them before retreating, in my defence i thought i was working on valid reasoning as i was told in comms moments earlier by my commanding officer to do what i can to help the poor feldjäger being kidnapped, so i did what i could and things ended this way. Being banned for a month is excessive as shit, i only killed 2 people, the lapo guy in the clip and the feldjäger in the crossfire. my ban was regarded as a mass rdm even though only 2 people lost their lives under my boot. I am truly sorry for any offense this caused the members of the opposing party, and i wish i can still be seen as a positive member of this community if my ban appeal gets accepted.

Additional Information: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/kzZjaiLTWpCjESu8N?invite=cr-MSxCVGwsMjAxMzA5NjA2

[Coffee]

Thank you for writing an apology. That's a good start, but honestly, it feels like you're downplaying your actions and not fully taking accountability.

Saying things like "Only killed 2 people" and defending your reasoning makes it come off like a half apology, half justification.

Just because someone from your faction is being detained does not mean you can sit on a roof and gun everyone down.

You're expected to engage, roleplay, and assess the situation, not shoot first and ask questions later.

Shooting into a crowd, killing people, including your faction member whom you were trying to "rescue" without any interaction, is MRDM.

Also, when I pulled you to a sit to discuss the situation, I was not planning on banning you. I was going to educate you on the rules.

But when I asked you why you did it, you didn't really give me an answer, and then said something along the lines of "because it was based".

This came off as you just blatantly trolling, which escalated the situation to a ban.

If you had just explained your side of the story calmly, it would have been a verbal warning or a note at most.

I'll let another member of UA decide the verdict of your appeal.