All Activity

i had to do a dossier once

might be tweaking

jack and jenny were childhood friends

Hello, I am the staff member who authorised your PK. I want to clarify that the PK guidelines do not only allow for griefPKs for harm being done, but also for causing 'grief' to the player. I believe that the threat you issued during the scene was sufficient to fall under grief, as it implied a threat to the position and possibly the life of the player, via a possible court ruling. It also would seem not be the first instance of this happening. Secondly, I want to clarify as to why I think this wouldn't fall under DirtPK. Dirt PKs are done to silence an individual who might provide information to, let's say, a judge or a superior officer. In this case, this was a result of a direct threat of action and not simply blackmail.

Like I said it would be a business opportunity for people such as myself. I have the capability to run an actual movie studio I think personally. The ministry of propaganda isn't the only entity that has the ability to make movies. Content wise theres so many things especially for MITHC. You can create a short film about the conquest of the USA, Criminal organisations and commissioned propaganda like films for factions. Additionally the only people that would be able to minge with the theatre is those who have the perms to access it. Only Moderators and Selected people with access to use it, will be able to display anything on the media player.

-1 I do not like this at all. We aren't missing out on anything, it would only bring more ways for users to minge and something which could prove hard to moderate.

This is a horrible idea. What sort of content would we have to show? The Ministry of Propaganda doesn't make movies or videos in any form.

Don't think this is the greatest argument but jäger will definitely cause this level of violence.

SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): Apology Which staff member banned you?: Lentz How long is your ban for?: Prem Why were you banned?: MRDM during a event Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: This is my formal apology to the Prometheus community for my actions and behavior in the Prometheus Community. I know i made a mistake when i started playing the game while drunk i had taken about 7 beers and 3 shots of jägerbulls when i was just walking around ingame somthing happend not sure i just know it was beacuse of KG what i heard from a friend who was in the KG i was being messed with by the KG i was yelling in the jail cells and something yada yada then i was released after 45min then i went and drank again then 25min they were having a event i guess i tought it was a good chance to have my ''revenge'' so now its been i think 2.5-3 months since my ban idk if you belive me but i understand i just want to see the new mitch coming out soon and wanna explore it

Character's name & rank: Max Richterß, Oberstleutnant SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:536630841 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): Nooby Explain why you were PK'd: Grief PK Why should you be un-PK'd?: I am appealing this because this PK does not meet the PK Guidelines or the criteria for a Grief PK. I was detained by a Mountaineer NCO. Then the individuals who detained me explicitly stated that I could be released and removed me from an office, however never untied me. While I was tied up, I walked to the BB Lobby, where I encountered Hauptmann Michael Braun. I informed him that I had already been cleared for release. Instead of listening to me or addressing the situation, he ignored what I said and immediately began dragging me. At that point, I stated that if he was going to do this (continuing to drag me) despite being informed that I was cleared for release, I would pursue charges and court martial him for refusing to release me. Under the PK Guidelines, a Grief PK requires severe harm to a Character, no harm was caused to Hauptmann Michael Braun’s character. A verbal statement about potential legal or punitive action does not constitute grief. At most, this situation could be interpreted as dirt, not grief and even then, it was never acted upon. The PK Guidelines explicitly state that PKs should be used as a last Resort and that attempts must be made to resolve the situation through roleplay first, unless impossible. After I was released, Michael Braun alleged that I had "threatened" his "life" and re-detained me on his own initiative. He then dragged me away from the surrounding People, into a empty BB cell. Inside the cell while I was alone wtih him, he did not issue any warning to me and did not persue any other roleplay escalation with me (charges, interrogation, report etc). He simply left me tied in a cell for about 15 minutes and took absolutely no action or attempt to resolve the situation. I was left in the cell until some judges who later walked in released me. Following this incident, Michael Braun made a complaint to the Field Marshal inside of his office, claiming that I had threatened his life. During the Meeting the Field Marshal explicitly warned me that I was not allowed to make such threats to another officer and clarified that if I really wanted to charge him, I would require a really good justification. He also reminded Michael Braun to acknowldge my gorget and told him that if he wanted to detain me, he would also require a really good justifiaction and proper cause. During the meeting, Michael made a complaint about me, but did not propose or request any form of resolution or disciplinary action despite having the opportunity to do so in the presence of the Field Marshal. Instead, he framed me in the complaint as having "threatened to kill" him. This does not reflect what I said to him at all in the original interaction. The Field Marshal provided guidance to both of us rather than issuing a punishment for either of us. This shows that the situation could've been resolved through roleplay means and did not warrant the immediate escalation to a PK. Michael Braun had multiple opportunities to resolve this situation through RP and chose not to engage at all before requesting a PK. This PK does not meet the pk criterea for Grief, was not used as Last Resort, and was not properly escalated in roleplay. No severe harm occurred, no RP resolution was attempted, and a conditional statement regarding me charging him if he was going to continue dragging me, which was never acted upon, does not justify a immediate PK. Due to these reasons I believe this PK should be overturned. Additional Information:

Make a ticket next time you are on the server and ask for UA

Denied. very clearly AI generated appeal, you may try again in 30-days.

Denied You deleted the character, no going back from that.

Denied. this was a valid PK on the praetors behalf, your actions were documented by the ouroboros.

Denied. This was a valid pk, as you did break FearRP.

Reduced to 5 days Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked

Denied. Improper format.

Denied This was a valid pk, and you did not submit a steamID either.

Denied. You had deleted the character.

BEAST MODE BEAST MODE BEAST MODE BEAST MODE BEAST MODE , BEAST MODE BEAST MODE .BEAST MODE BEAST MODE BEAST MODE BEAST MODE ! Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked