Swisher

+1 Very good roleplayer, has assisted on numerous occasions and overall amazing dude

I'll give my last reply to this here. I had contacted the men who had organized the event, to which they stated: "He voluntarily fought and agreed vocaly in front of everyone if I remember correctly right before we called for you" and "Never heard him complain" whilst providing clips of the fight itself. If what you say in your side is true, then this would be a very different story. However, if you are unable to provide a clip, it makes it harder to see your story fully. I only entered the situation when you were at the destination, where he had explained that you agreed to the deathmatch alongside the other person. Neither of you denied this. I had also made a chat in LOOC stating that the PK was good to go. Whilst watching the entire scene, I didn't see you oppose at all, either verbally or through your actions. You had went where they wanted, fought aggressively in the fight, and ended up losing, leading to your death.

In response: 1. You hadn't showcased this to me at all. I would understand if you had attempted to say this in any regard, but whilst he was explaining how you had consented, you showed no rebuttal. You had also willingly got into their car, and I mentioned something akin to "PK good to go" in LOOC. 2. You had decided to enter their car without coercion, as explained in your first appeal, and had been placed into a fight. Again, I would completely understand if you hadn't consented and made that clear, but I was working off you actively fighting whilst not saying anything against the battle. If you have a clip showcasing when you were tied or anywhere showing you didn't consent, that would be helpful. I can only work off of what I saw there after taking the ticket and your word. I will also attempt to contact the men who organized the event to request a clip or more context.

Hello, I was the staff member who issued the PK on your character. The PK was issued under the guideline of Suicide. In this case specifically, you had partook in a voluntary death-game with another player, where you would partake in a fight with only one victor. When I took the ticket, it was not simply just simply accepted. They had explained how you both had consented to the game, willingly were transported there, and then would both fight. Whilst preparing for this, I had mentioned in LOOC that you were both being set active as part of this game. You were able to see this, as it was said nearby to you. During the actual event, you hadn't shown any reluctance or unwillingness, and had charged out to attack the other player. However, if you didn't consent, that would change things up quite a bit, but you hadn't spoke up or acted in a way that would draw me to that conclusion at all, weighing that you actively fought and didn't oppose the explanation that you consented to the game. The biggest takeaway should be that rules still apply at all times. On "off hours", you cannot expect me to take consenting to a PK as a joke, especially when warned of the risks.

Adding on to what Perchance and Momsmom said, I spoke to Hound who knew a bit more on the situation. You carried out a command which ended up having repercussions ICly, and the PK complied with all the guidelines. The CdKK found out it was you who directly contributed, and was able to punish you for placing him in cuffs. For context, yes, Momsmom's character was PKed, but there were several people contributing to the arrest of Perchance and Leo, all of which could've faced punishment.

+1 All of his notes are from last year, and he is a fun roleplayer all around. He also used to be trusted, so he has a head start on the commands.

+1 Fantastic roleplayer, active on off hours, all his notes/bans are from a while back. I support his entry

+1 As someone with a lot of previous offences, people can change. His most recent offence was nearly 4 months ago, and most of these aren't too extreme. He knows he messed up, and knows how to correct himself for the future. I believe he would be a great addition to the team.

+1 Personally, I believe he got mixed up with the wrong people and has separated from them since. He was a good roleplayer with no major bans in the past, and he has been gone for around 2 months now for this mistake.

So you decided to call him a pedophile, in character, over a national broadcast?

+1 Active, good roleplayer. Contributes a lot to the server and follows the rules, helps others whenever they need it. Perfect fit

+1 Amazing RP from this man, wasn't discouraged from a former ban and appealed it. I believe he'd be a good and active addition to the team.

He was NHC order PK'ed by myself, for (after asking to transfer) being outed as a rat by the Konteradmiral. He had lured the Konteradmiral into a meeting at the cafe, where 10 members of the National Security Bureau burst out and arrested the admiral, with Burkhart not being placed in cuffs at all. This was also just after being meta-promoted by myself to Kommodore, which is also very scummy.

Hello. I NHC order PK'ed you for participating in a raid on the ICC. You were apart of a group of NSB members who did the following: Filed a gatehouse the same time as entering, with the request being denied after they entered Broke into the ICC with 8 agents after entry was denied, for a PCO on a Feldjager CO Attempted to detain the Chief of the Reserve The entire situation was abysmal, and led to absolutely nothing of value, therefore you alongside another wehrmann were pked for it after being named directly by a high CO who was at the situation.

+1