Leaderboard

I've never seen anything like it.

Your Name: Arthur Goldstien SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:1:146827208 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): Dispute Which staff member banned you?: SlickB How long is your ban for?: 2 weeks Why were you banned?: MRDM Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: Please look in damage logs. I did not fire a single shot and I was banned for no reason. Just because someone has a similar name doesnt mean I shouldve been banned too. Please make sure you ban the correct person. I've written over 100 pages of documents for the 91st and I was banned for no reason. Additional Information: N/A

You never mentioned this in the staff sit, the claimant said I would like to pk this guy for fearp, then I replied with there was no time given, the claimant then responded with "well you jumped over the fence and we shot you through the fence." you then responded with "I see this pretty clearly." there was no mention about my "behaviour", this is not to go against you and I thank you for agreeing the time was short. But in the sit, I do not remember any mention of this aforementioned behaviour as the PK reason, the PK reason in question was because I "jumped over the fence to escape and was shot through the fence." to my knowledge of what occurred in the sit. And in the clip, it shows that I was pushed from the fence to the outside from the gunshots not that I had manually jumped over the fence on top of the face also that the fence boosts you up. Also would like to mention, again, I had stopped and if they gave me the time to actually execute the mugging it would've completely gone through as it did with the mugging 10 minutes later after this interaction. Thank you still for the support.

Denied.

Your Name: Joe Marston SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): 76561198330208331 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): Dispute Which staff member banned you?: Slickb How long is your ban for?: 2w Why were you banned?: MRDM Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: Given the context of the situation that me and my fellow 91st air force management members where involved In, it was a very reasonable for us to have opened fire. For my case the lives of my brothers in arms had been directly threatened by the Viceroy. At first all he talked about was that there would be a "purge" or our division multiple times. He then processed to mention the largest and most crucial members of our division the "Goldsteins" that they and i quote "It was mostly the Goldstein people so I think probably we start with them, I think They're gonna die" coming from any one else I can see how rule 3 of the killing rules would count it as an "idle threat" but coming from the Viceroy who has multiple guards at his back who will do his bidding? That is an Active Threat on their lives and to some degree all of ours as we now would have IC knowledge that "purge" means death because he said "start with them" meaning all our lives were in imminent danger. All of this will be in the provided clip. The rule I'm sighting There are two types of threats, an 'Active Threat' and an 'Idle Threat'. Players may kill for an active threat, but they may not kill for an idle threat. The difference between the two is situational, but it will always pertain if the person making the threats has a weapon in their hand. For example, someone pointing a gun at you and threatening to kill you is an Active threat. Additional Information: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/nNhgRt6Ozpe93cm98?invite=cr-MSxyT0MsMjE3MzcwNzcx