-
Posts
41 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by Browniemeister
-
Commune Criminal organization application
Browniemeister replied to A guy named_Cj's topic in Denied
We don't do historical parties at all, I'd recommend changing the name to something independent of the timeframe and not associated at all with the 20-40s timeframe. -
30 or so minutes later, you had a Luftwaffe character that ran away from a ceremony after causing a disruption. You then were hunted down and decided to open fire on all your people. It seems that "Being a New Player" doesn't matter to you. https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/i8VLfnxkA62q1xdte/d13375n7tulm?invite=cr-MSx4VlAsMzIzNTk3MTUs
-
-
Wow. AI generated ban appeal. TERRBILE. EMBARASSING.
-
Ok. So seemingly it is lost upon you and we're going around in circles so I'll reinforce my point. We did not need to summon you in specific, as you, the Ministry of Justice and High Command of the Armed Forces would not permit such actions from us. Stating that it is unlawful and such as previously stated. We also did not need to summon you in particular when we had already summarized your attitude as to how it'd go as we can see in this clip: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/2dc1vbvNNSp9a2/d1337pvWtoUB?invite=cr-MSwzaVEsMjgwODk5OTYs In this clip, we see a situation transpiring at the front of the ICC where two PCO's are being enforced on the Director of the NSB at the time and the Chief of the Landespoliezi. You had decided to say both are invalid over reasons that are completely bogus, you denied the NSB General warrant because it was missing "NSB" that's like during 1942rp denying an SS warrant because it was missing the "SS-" suffix. It's retarded. You then denied the warrant on Erwin Konig because it was missing an N on it... Then, instead of deescalating the situation with the citizen you had immediately escalated. "Oh they opened fire, they opened fire" You said these words assuming no consequence would come from them. We had, indeed, went through all our options. The Military had detained me for enforcing lawful warrants, you had opened fire on my men, I was against everyone for no reason but because they could. You are responsible for the acts of your subordinates if you are standing right infront of them and do nothing to stop them. I hate the precedent some try to set when a Grenadier opens fire during some situation, because the General didn't immediately step in they are responsible. That is dumb. But that is not what you did, you were written down as leading marches, being involved in detainments of MOI personnel, gunning down NSB enforcing lawful warrants, the list goes on. The last time I had tried to meet with you, the General of the Infantry had gotten involved then the Kriegsmarschall. How are we to discuss "taking a thousand different routes" when you ignore the routes that we did go through. And regarding your "point" with the Kriegsmarine, there is difference between a historical german organization that had been named BLANKmarine for a century before 1940 and then one most infamous organizations that you don't say their name ever. Mistakes happen on these documents, but do you really think that going "THIS IS NOW ALL INVALIDATED." is how you do that? IC punishments were given out for mistakes. This is my last answer on the topic, thank you.
-
+1 I had this man inside one of my IC factions and I enjoyed his presence inside of it, I think he'd make a solid pick for staff.
-
Meem can be incredibly bashful over incredibly minor statements or situations, while he is sometimes solid for a few IC positions I don't think he'd make the best for staff. Neutral.
-
Hi there, I PK'ed you on order of NHC. Your argument seems to lie in the fact that I did not exhaust all options before executing a PK on you, which we either did or they were blocked. Generals and seemingly everyone on the server is so entrenched in the idea that you HAVE to be taken to court in order for a PK to be accepted. While this is sometimes the case, it lies in the case-by-case basis in which your PK fell as an exception to that "standard" that has been dreamt of. We had exhausted all our options, how are we to question you when you open fire upon us when enforcing a warrant or constantly raiding the MOI? How are we going to bring you to court when the Justice Minister orders my arrest illegally in conjunction with the War Marshal, how are we to summon you on top of all the reasons we've provided and then some? Your faction was constantly raiding our Ministry, evidence pointed towards YOU being the perpetrator. We still receive evidence damning your character that had either A. Ordered these Raids, B. Did nothing about them when you were the highest on or C. Involved in these raids. The Marines nonstop raided the Ministry of the Interior with oftentimes no clause and when there was one, it was for like breaking out a random Grenadier. I am not humoring the roleplay of constantly raiding when something doesn't go my way, which you fell victim too, and were appropriately punished. You may claim that we did not "exhaust all options" when your own generals and people subordinate to you got you in this mess. I also don't appreciate revealing documents that have been used in active roleplay on your PK appeal, exposing an investigation into a general that just so happens to go missing... moron. Another argument you present is that a old, returning, player be punished for accidentally using the wrong suffix for a faction and therefore invalidates your PK? That's retarded and you know it, pulling at straws. While I understand the roleplay of the situation wasn't the best, that lead to IC consequences for the people involved and they have been appropriately punished, again not invalidating the PK. You escalated incidents that didn't need to be escalated, were found out, then punished. Have a better control on your subordinates. Sometimes you are roleplayed at and not with, please keep that in mind next time you make an appeal.
-
Vanessa's Character Design Share
Browniemeister replied to PinkSquirrel's topic in General Discussion
Can you draw me next :3 -
I know English isn't your first language seemingly, but "if I am unbanned that is" implies you'd keep doing it unless you were unbanned. I'd change that or remove what you said at the end there entirely.
-
Cum.
-
i want to be the best tool in the shed, but first i need to be let back into the Shed
-
VON DEUSCHALDND NUMBER !