TheOblivionist

Neutral leaning towards +1 You aren't exactly known for being the most virtuous person out there and you are portuguese BUT you do put in your fair share of work and you can be serious when the situation calls for it. Immature but you have experience and overall a good candidate for the staff team.

-1 This is a resistance cell, not a mafia. You make it abundantly clear that the sole goal of your mafia is to destabilize the German Empire with little to no hint of actually engaging in business rp. Furthermore, you are operating as a french mafia in the capital of the country you are at war with and I see no mention of how you plan to conceal your french identity or blend into the culture to fit in. Also, this entire thing is AI. And no, you didn't make the structure yourself, it is abundantly clear that this is fully AI generated without any prior input besides "Generate a couple paragraphs for a french mafia operating in Berlin in the 1940's." Also, I am pretty sure I have encountered this group before. If the old man in the red shirt is part of this, then this is just one of those minge rdm groups that go around raiding shit.

-1 You initiated a gunfight and lost. As a police officer you are expected to respond with the appropriate level of force. Typically in this scenario you are expected to roleplay it out by ramming his car until its essentially immobile and putting him at gunpoint. Nobody was run over, yet you made the decision to get out of the car and shoot at a military officer. I personally do not see how this is a PK bait either. All he does is he rams your car. This was a scenario where calling for backup and cornering the car would've been more than possible, resulting in their detention without having to PK anyone. You were rammed by a military officer whilst in a car and you took a risk despite having the option to apprehend the vehicle and arrest both men (could literally just exit the vehicle and point at both passengers and that would be FearRP, you have the numbers to do so), and lost your life as a result of that risk.

-1 Faggot.

+1 great ban appeal free my homie

- 1 I do not see how this will benefit the server in any capacity. Black PM's only exist in the form of jumpsuit models & Female PM's are similarly limited to dresses. Furthermore, the problem doesn't just come from the person playing with these PM's, but from other people being minges and edgelords. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that there are nasty people that will try and groom Female PM larpers, and similarly, players that will stereotype and hurl racial slurs at Black PM larpers, both of which has happened before. To add on, what jobs / occupations can a person with these PM's hold? Outside of CivRP, they're practically useless. And do not get me started on the idea of using Female PM's solely for paperwork related jobs. We have femboys for that exact reason. 90% of female secretary larpers back in the day were OOCly dating the guy they were a secretary to.

+1 Good boy, fun to be around and an all-around chill person. He always contributes to roleplay and never minges around.

You're an autistic retard. All you do is self-insert yourself in every character you make and act retarded and unlikeable. You've been doing the same exact shit from when we were in our censored era, which was 2 years ago. Deadass autistic, not even throwing this just as an insult, I really do think you're just severely autistic and completely can't read the room around you. Take a break, seriously, direct your energy at something more productive and enlist in your military as a tank operator or something.

Faggot creep. Go seek help.

Hello, and thank you for submitting this PK appeal. I’m the individual who made the ticket that led to your PK. To provide some context: you were near the Landespolizei station during a civil war where everyone was shooting at eachother. At the time, you weren’t displaying any hostility nor were you carrying a weapon, so rather than shooting you down, we opted to arrest you as a less severe response. You were clearly instructed to stop moving and warned that any reckless actions could result in your death. Despite this, you chose to draw your MP40 and attempt to engage us, which led to you being swiftly gunned down by an Unterfeldwebel from the KG. Even if you believed the arrest was unwarranted (which, to be clear, it wasn’t), FearRP still applies. In the given situation, there was no reasonable scenario in which the risk you took would be in compliance with FearRP rules. Please take the time to thoroughly read the server rules and PK guidelines to avoid losing your character to situations like this in the future. Unfortunately, I don’t have the clip myself, as the KG member who killed you was the one who recorded it. Layheeee should also have the footage and may be able to provide it.

-1 The amount of shit you ate has greatly impeded your cognitive functions and has rendered you retarded. People will appreciate you more larping in an asylum.

Hello again. First off, while yes, I could've asked for a "time out", the conditions which I was put in, especially given how "aggressive" you were when it came to asking me questions, made me panicky. People handle panic in different kinds of ways; sometimes they're not in the proper state of mind to take the appropriate steps to gain bearing and allow themselves to "catch their head". I felt like if you had acted more impartial and allowed for both sides to properly explain their side of the story instead of barraging me with questions and concluding that, roughly but not quoting you "you're lying to a staff member and won't admit", I would've felt comfortable and more clear-minded to where I would be able to properly convey my side of the story in full detail and get it resolved. It would take a person three seconds logically to pull their MP40 out and adjust their mouse to aim at the civvy before firing, I don't pull the MP40 out and immediately start firing because A) that's stupid B) I waste bullets and C) a stray bullet would've also hit any nearby bystanders and I would've likely been in the sit room for roughly the same reason. Unfortunately I wasn't able to clip the incident particularly because at the time I didn't think it was going to matter. Usually when someone gets accidentally RDM'd and takes it to a sit the situation gets resolved in the sit room and nothing comes out of it, both sides come to an understanding, the guy who killed him apologizes and that's that. Unfortunately, because, again, you were particularly focused on me and not acting fully impartial, I was unable to explain the full story and the kommissaranwarter was still in the assumption that I was lying and that I killed him because of what he did to me 30 minutes prior. I have since spoken to the kommissaranwarter in a 1 on 1 setting on Discord and we came to a resolution and he understands that though the circumstances were very fishy that I had no ill intent and it was simply just a really bad coincedence. Again, I don't think anyone acted out of malicious intent, rather a lack of communication and jumping to conclusions way too quick. I definitely could've avoided the situation by simply just arresting the civilian, however I also feel like the situation could've been resolved in the sit room with both sides coming to an understanding. I feel like a ban wasn't appropriate, and hope that should UA accept this ban appeal to either revoke the ban in its entirety or reduce my ban time and change the reasoning of the ban to just "RDM". I think I've definitely learnt from the mistakes I have made and will be more careful in regards to trigger discipline and to clip situations like this in the future so I can avoid situations like these again.

Thank you for replying. I will debunk some of the arguments you have made. Firstly, I thought it was well established where the civi had actually been. I have said this twice that when I said "behind" I said the Civi was on the road infront of the station while the lapo kommissaranwarter was on the sidewalk. Granted, there could've been miscommunication because again, I'm not very fluent in English and I sometimes use the wrong terminology. I don't recall the circles thing. I did say he was bhopping and that he was moving in very irregular patterns. Might've been miscommunication as I said but i do recall mentioning the civi bhopping and whatnot. I also don't recall "laughing" unless I did sound like I was laughing, which is possible although 1. unintentionally and 2. anyone who has rp'd with me knows that I have a speech impediment and that I don't handle pressure very well. It's not a guilt thing either, some people kind of break when theyre under pressure. I definitely felt panicky given the fact that you were antagonising me from the beginning despite the obvious lack of substantial evidence other than a clip of me getting shot by him prior and him dying 30 minutes later. As I said, it felt quite biased and you treated me like as if i was a minge instead of a roleplayer. I also mentioned the core details, granted I kept having to reaffirm them because you and the other guy kept questioning me about those same core details so I was unable to establish the full story. As for the minge thing, I admit I could've went and arrested him. I do admit that I definitely shouldn't have just lit him up. I will take blame for my handling of that particular situation. I'm not vindictive and I've never revenge RDM'd someone over shooting me thirty minutes ago in a separate situation. I've had worse done to me but I didn't proceed and break NLR just to light them up for no reason. I felt like your judgement was based solely of a "he said she said" stance and out of pure speculation. Granted, the situation does look bad on me considering the circumstances that happened prior. I'm not saying you acted purely out of malicious intent but it definitely felt like you took sides from before I even explained my side of the story. Never have I done something as petty as this on prometheus and never have I lied to a staff member in my almost 2 years of playing on this server. The ban reason itself felt off aswell for the same reasons I explained in the ban appeal. I apologise for being a horrible marksman and I'm happy to have the ban lowered to just a note for RDM at most since I should've been more careful. Overall, this felt like an interrogation more than a staff sit and I understandably felt uncomfortable. I even offered to pay the kommissaranwarter for whatever equipment he ended up losing as a result of his death. What is the point of a staff sit when me trying to defend myself and explain the situation is considered "lying" despite any clear evidence contradicting my story? Overall, I made errors but it was a very scuffy sit and I definitely think things could've gone much smoother if you acted more impartial and made decisions based on clear evidence rather than "he said she said".

Your Name: TheOblivionist SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:232863657 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): Dispute Which staff member banned you?: R4ged How long is your ban for?: 6 days Why were you banned?: "RDM / Revenge RDM / Lying to Staff / PO's". A minge was being retarded calling everyone "Nazis" and punch minging and I decided to try and shoot at the minge civi. Instead, 4 of my shots landed on an innocent Kommissaranwarter that happened to be on the road. I stopped for a bit because obviously I kinda made an oopsie shooting my own guy down by accident and by the time I re-adjusted my camera to gun the civi down he had managed to bhop his way out of there. I was then accused, with the clip not even showing myself shooting at him deliberately, for doing just that. Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: I think it was a very unjust ban. At most, I should've just gotten an "RDM" note for being a bad marksman, but being accused of lying despite me giving my side of the story and the clip not even showing the civi that I was shooting at is just crazy (his camera wasn't panned to the station, where I was at). I felt like the staff member was siding with the Kommissaranwarter and being biased despite the lack of evidence. I even apologized to the kommissaranwarter and offered to pay up for my own errors. I'm also not very fluent in English, and that probably didn't help my case as I mislabeled a couple of terms that made my story sound more unbelievable. I think this ban should be reviewed, and the decision should be toned down to at least a note, at best, as being a bad marksman is simply just human error. Also note that at the time the military irp were doing "readiness drills" at the time and there was a lot of chaos in the city, and there were more civi minges than usual acting stupid. Additional Information: Him adding PO's from like 4 months ago felt really sour, as well as him including both RDM and Revenge RDM as a reason. I felt like the staff member was just trying to find a reason to ban me for whatever reason and decided to stack my offenses up. I've never revenge RDM'd and I had worse things done to me than that, so I don't know why I would deliberately break NLR and shoot him again. Maybe I'm just overthinking it, I don't know what actually went on in the staff member's mind.