-
Posts
165 -
Joined
-
Days Won
18
Everything posted by Slug
-
You just admitted to breaking the rules. It is within the discretion of our staff members to select punishment as they deem fit. Considering your punishment history, a week ban is not an 'inappropriate punishment'. Dispute appeals are meant for disputing the ban itself (i.e. the ban never should have happened because you didn't break the rules); however, you did break the rules which makes this dispute invalid. That being said, considering your POs are fairly spread apart, I'm inclined to believe a week ban for mic-spam may be a bit excessive. Your ban will be reduced to 2 days. Appeal: Accepted Ban: Reduced to 2 days Thread: Locked
-
Hi @SomethingorOther Thank you for taking the time to make a ban appeal. I think there may be some confusion as to the purpose of this thread. This thread is meant to be a ban appeal, instead, a majority of your posts make this seem to be a player report. While the player involved will be dealt with separately, the points you bring up about the other player's infractions and behavior are separate from the main topic of this post which is about the rules that you have broken. It is apparent that you did in-fact RDM the guy twice, so for that alone, the appeal should have been an "apology" and not a "dispute". Disputing a ban means you're disputing it in its entirety (i.e. you should never have been banned in the first place). The ban was properly applied due to an infraction of our server rules and therefore a dispute against it is invalid. The actions of the other player brought up in this appeal will be handled separately, but as stated previously, this appeal is about your ban specifically. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked
-
Ban is valid and has since expired. Appeal: Closed Thread: Locked
-
As per ban appeal guidelines, your only opportunity to dispute this ban would have been within 72 hours of when the ban was issued. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked
-
Server Logs Tutorial*
-
1 year and 8 months ago, but welcome back Appeal: Accepted Thread: Locked
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
A violation of our rules results in bans/notes, not IC punishments (though if a rule infraction is severe enough, it can result in both). Coming up with a fake situation in order to avoid NLR can be seen as an attempt to loophole/power game the situation. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked
-
Even though you used 2 separate accounts to evade within 5 days of each other? STEAM_0:1:196083663 banned 7/30/24 for Global Rule 1 STEAM_0:0:860900004 banned 8/5/24 for Alt Evasion STEAM_0:0:898385740 banned 8/10/24 for Alt Evasion
-
The initial appeal actually looked pretty nice. Oh well! Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked
-
What is your discord username?
-
If you're interested in appealing your exile you must first obtain permission from Global Administration. Please make a ticket in our Community Discord so we can have a chat.
-
Hello @TommyLegend Thank you for taking the time to make a PK Appeal. After reviewing the case, we have decided to deny the appeal The clip you provided is no longer available, so I am unable to review that specifically So you admit to driving off while under FearRP. @ItIsÀrishas explained the situation that occurred and how you fell under the FearRP guideline. PKs fall under an "IC" situation. You did not break any rules, but your character did not value their own life and therefore died. They cannot come back from this. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked
-
Accepted Contact a member of UA when you are next in-game to have your flags reinstated.
-
You have a very extensive PO history on BOTH of your accounts. Since a lot of these POs from the STEAM_0:1:419694642 account are from 2023 I will give you another chance, but any further offenses will ultimately lead to another permanent ban. Appeal: Accepted Thread: Locked
-
You have a long history of alt evasion. Let's start with your main account STEAM_0:1:486945364 which was banned on 3/18/24 for "NITRP| PUNCH MINGE | RACISM". Since that ban, you've attempted to alt evade with several accounts: STEAM_0:0:15639198 banned 3/19/24 STEAM_0:0:149537465 banned 3/21/24 STEAM_0:1:97728566 banned 3/27/24 STEAM_0:1:944662000 banned 5/12/25 STEAM_0:1:415711436 banned 8/30/25 STEAM_0:0:417015326 banned 8/30/25 It has nothing to do with the "accounts" breaking the rules, it has to do with the person who owns the accounts. You broke our rules and therefore are not allowed to join our server. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Thread has been moved to Ban Appeals Given the evidence provided, I'd say the ban was applied properly, so a dispute is denied. This is not an excuse. You're on our server to roleplay, if you got involved in an RP situation and "couldn't tell" because of a circumstance you put yourself in (having music playing on max-boosted volume) then this is your own fault. This is roleplay. People are detained for nonsense reasons all the time. This is why there is a Ministry of Justice, legal system, etc. It is not against our rules for LaPo to detain someone for no reason. Your last ban was on 7/27, not even a full month ago Even if the officer was an error sign, they stated in voice chat that you J-Walked, your arms became bound with a sound effect, and your character began shuffling towards the officer on their own. Not sure what other conclusion could have been made other than that you were being arrested. As @Noobyexplained, if the RP situation needed to be interrupted so you could install our content the proper path to take would have been contacting staff to get permission to disconnect briefly. Instead, the situation turned into LTARP. I want to try and sympathize with you, but almost every argument given in this appeal is nonsense. The ban is upheld as it is valid and therefore a dispute appeal is denied. Given the situation, you may appeal the ban again at your own discretion, but this time, as an "Apology" appeal. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked
-
After further review of the clips provided and statements given by both sides of the situation, the UA team will be denying this appeal. Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked
-
Alt evasion is against our rules... Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked
-
Thank you for the apology Appeal: Accepted Thread: Locked
-
Given that the original ban was only for 1 week the appeal will be accepted, but, any future bans that result in alt evasion attempts will remain permanent. Appeal: Accepted Thread: Locked
-
Hi @Trent9000, Thank you for taking the time to make a ban appeal. After further discussion of the ban with @CJ_, and reviewing the clips & arguments presented in this appeal it has been decided that the ban was applied improperly and that no rules were broken during the interaction. Appeal: Accepted Ban: Voided Thread: Locked