All Activity

you know baumer

Your Name: Erwin Muller SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): 76561199728372710 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): Apology Which staff member banned you?: Jakob How long is your ban for?: 1w Why were you banned?: killing someone because they said yes to being a jew Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: Hey admins, I got banned for 7 days for RDM and I just wanted to say I'm sorry. I know I shouldn’t have killed the civilian but he punched me first and kept resisting when I tried to arrest him. I thought it was okay in RP but I guess I messed up. I really like the server and don’t want to wait a whole week to play again. I’ve read the rules again and I understand now that I should’ve handled it differently. I promise I won’t do it again and I’ll be more careful next time. If you could lower the ban time I’d really appreciate it. Thanks for reading this. Additional Information:

You hit the Interior Minister in the face and that then started a gunfight. Nothing much more needed to be said. I'll let another member of Upper Administration decide if this is accepted or not.

Hey Mate, I highly suggest using the Required Format to do a ban appeal in the thread above yours, as it will contain vital information for your Ban Appeal Process.

Your whole justification for my PK is that I went against your orders. Your orders were not clearly given (just spamming a bind in chat is not clear). Also as I stated before, I began transmitting my message as you were giving said orders. I also feel this is not very genuine RP as you guys shot us both, not just me, which says you didnt intend on even detaining us or wanting to create a further RP scenario. There was no active threat or reason to shoot us other then me transmitting a radio message within the 5 seconds of being ordered to detain us and then shooting us. Im sure if you guys wanted to actually RP with us and detain us you would have waited for us to react properly to your demands. Another thing to mention is that in the clip I only count two people actually aiming weapons at us. This does not seem like enough to make sense that the Richterprasident of the police courts, one of the top leaders in control of a powerful court, and the deputy chief of the gendarmerie to be feared by two random Military aiming guns at us while we are driving in our staff car.

Your response doesn’t align with the server’s FearRP rules or even your own submitted actions. Let’s clarify something critical: we were never pulled out of the vehicle. At the time of the “don’t radio” message, our car was actively reversing and still in motion. FearRP Rule #7 is explicit—FearRP does not apply to individuals inside a moving vehicle. The only time it does is when the vehicle is immobilized, the armed party is within five feet, and orders are clearly issued. None of that applied here. You claim the order to not radio came first—but again, I was in the car with Twister. The message was already being sent when your chat line appeared. There is no cancel function for typed radio—it sends once the Enter key is hit, and when it comes to radio via voice, that is even more perdinant. You did not give the minimum 10 seconds required by General Rule #2 and FearRP Rule #1. You issued one fast-scrolling line of text, while chat was active and cluttered, and fired less than five seconds later. That’s not FearRP—it’s an ambush. You also stated, and I quote, “you can get detained for no reason.” That is a direct violation of FearRP Rule #3, which requires that detainment and FearRP have valid justification. Claiming you don’t need one is openly admitting to powergaming. FearRP cannot be weaponized to force a kill without meeting the proper conditions, and this situation failed those conditions across the board. This was not a lawful detainment or a valid PK—it was a rapid escalation from a passive RP interaction into a rule-bending execution.

Well that is out of the window when you break FearRP and radio when told not to. Absolutely untrue, you can review the clip I submitted to get the character PKed. This applies to like insulting someone OOCly and them detaining you based off of that, realistically in this server you can get detained for no reason. Which at that point you pursue ICly. Yes it was, I clearly stated in chat to stop moving. Alongside another individual stating in chat to not move aswell. Reason to be detained does not have to be provided at all. In conclusion to my response. I will reiterate the fact, 1. The Character was detained and shot for an IC reason. 2. FearRP was properly established by two individuals, and Bobb Pikeman failed to listen to our orders which lead to his untimely death. 3. The Order to not radio in while under gunpoint, was clearly stated before radioing in.

Hey admins, I got banned for 7 days for RDM and I just wanted to say I'm sorry. I know I shouldn’t have killed the civilian but he punched me first and kept resisting when I tried to arrest him. I thought it was okay in RP but I guess I messed up. I really like the server and don’t want to wait a whole week to play again. I’ve read the rules again and I understand now that I should’ve handled it differently. I promise I won’t do it again and I’ll be more careful next time. If you could lower the ban time I’d really appreciate it. Thanks for reading this. -Erwin Muller panzer

Hello! I was the Gericht member in vehicle with Twister, this is my response to what was stated above by nugget. I was inside the vehicle with Twister during the entire situation, and the PK of his character, Bobb Pikeman, was unjustified under multiple rules regarding FearRP, escalation, and lawful detainment. According to FearRP guidelines, detainment must be based on a valid in-character reason—none was provided. We were complying with an earlier order to leave when, suddenly, a vague command to “detain” was issued with no clear cause, and an officer in the military issued a rushed warning not to radio. While chat was active and overlapping, Twister sent a radio message about our detainment, which was already in progress when that order appeared. Within five seconds, we were fired upon. This violates General Rule #2 and FearRP Rule #1, which both require a visible warning and a minimum ten-second window to comply. We were inside a reversing vehicle, which further limits what could be interpreted as non-compliance—FearRP Rule #7 specifically says it only applies to immobilized vehicles with armed parties within five feet issuing direct orders. That was not the case here. There was no attempt to escalate through non-lethal means or to give us a fair chance to surrender—this was a direct jump from vague detainment to immediate execution, violating Killing Rules #1 and #10. The idea that “none of this matters for a PK” is incorrect—General Rule #18 makes clear that a PK must follow all server rules to be valid. If the FearRP itself was not properly established, the PK cannot stand. I am requesting that the PK be voided, Bobb Pikeman’s character be restored, and that clarification be issued stating that FearRP-based orders must be clearly delivered and followed by an adequate reaction window, especially when the subject is in a vehicle with limited ability to respond.

Hey, I am the individual in the Military that executed the PK, alongside requested it. Let's first pick into this appeal, I gave you specific orders to not radio in as it compromised the secrecy of the detainment of yourself and another individual within the Gericht. After giving you such you proceeded to radio in to you're faction that you were detained which gave me one option to kill you, and end the life of Bobb Pikeman. The 10 second rule stopped applying after you proceeded to radio in against the orders of myself while under gunpoint from myself and other individual within the Military. This resulted in the death of you're character. This does not matter one bit my friend, you're men proceeded to smart-off to the Field Marshal which resulted in him ordering your arrest, which resulted in your death. This also does not matter at all during PKs, you were detained and you broke Fearp. Most of the stuff said in this appeal does not even mean anything for PK appeals. Nor, was this PK handled poorly. There was clear RP done in the situation, and at the end of the situation you refused to comply with my order under fearp which resulted in the untimely demise of Bobb Pikeman.

Character's name & rank: Polizeinspektor Bobb Pikemen SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:294292033 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): Jack Explain why you were PK'd: FearRP Why should you be un-PK'd?: We were outside the ICC asking a Feldjager if they would be interested in transferring. The feldmarshall comes outside the base and tells us to leave which was no problem. We began to leave and got into our car and then the Feldmarshall ordered us to be detained. The military started swarming us, I radio in the Military is detaining us. They then immediately open fire after 5 seconds. One guy apparently had spammed a message in chat saying not to use radio, which I did not see. I also was radioing as he was saying it. I believe there are multiple rules and precedent that you have to give reasonable time for you to react. I also was not alone and inside a vehicle which makes it less justifiable to say I was 'risking my life' by radioing in. Overall this PK was poorly handled and the RP situation was basically over as we were leaving, as the feldmarshall told us to. There was literally no reason to detain us either. This is the clip used to justify the PK: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/kCtaaOLQjOsgJYzfC?invite=cr-MSxWcEEsNzIxNzA1NjU

Thank you for writing an apology. That's a good start, but honestly, it feels like you're downplaying your actions and not fully taking accountability. Saying things like "Only killed 2 people" and defending your reasoning makes it come off like a half apology, half justification. Just because someone from your faction is being detained does not mean you can sit on a roof and gun everyone down. You're expected to engage, roleplay, and assess the situation, not shoot first and ask questions later. Shooting into a crowd, killing people, including your faction member whom you were trying to "rescue" without any interaction, is MRDM. Also, when I pulled you to a sit to discuss the situation, I was not planning on banning you. I was going to educate you on the rules. But when I asked you why you did it, you didn't really give me an answer, and then said something along the lines of "because it was based". This came off as you just blatantly trolling, which escalated the situation to a ban. If you had just explained your side of the story calmly, it would have been a verbal warning or a note at most. I'll let another member of UA decide the verdict of your appeal.

Your Name: Viktor Verruckt SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:1:565673807 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): apology Which staff member banned you?: coffee How long is your ban for?: 1 month Why were you banned?: i opened fire on lapo for kidnapping a feldjager. Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: I am truly sorry for opening fire on the LaPo, and killing 2 of them before retreating, in my defence i thought i was working on valid reasoning as i was told in comms moments earlier by my commanding officer to do what i can to help the poor feldjäger being kidnapped, so i did what i could and things ended this way. Being banned for a month is excessive as shit, i only killed 2 people, the lapo guy in the clip and the feldjäger in the crossfire. my ban was regarded as a mass rdm even though only 2 people lost their lives under my boot. I am truly sorry for any offense this caused the members of the opposing party, and i wish i can still be seen as a positive member of this community if my ban appeal gets accepted. Additional Information: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/kzZjaiLTWpCjESu8N?invite=cr-MSxCVGwsMjAxMzA5NjA2

Character's name & rank: Oberleutnant Ashton Wollfram SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:640041114 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): Prime Explain why you were PK'd: Initiating a gunfight. Why should you be un-PK'd?: I was in a situation where me and 2 other guards were blocking a door from the interior minister entering the BendlerBlock, we argue for about 30 seconds then the Interior Minister begins to tie our guard chief who is an Oberst, I try to stop him from tying our Chief by hitting him with the butt of my gun; with no intentions of killing him, then the Interior Ministers guards then proceeds to open fire on me, resulting in a huge gun fight. Additional Information: Thank you for reading my appeal, I just wanted clarification on how hitting someone is considered initiating a gunfight.

Your Name: James Bierhals SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:1:127986939 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): Apology Which staff member banned you?: Coffee How long is your ban for?: Permanent Why were you banned?: Here Is my original ban appeal that goes into detail. Why do you deserve to be unbanned? I believe I deserve to be unbanned because I’ve taken the past four months to reflect on my actions. I understand the importance of upholding community standards, and I’ve learned from this experience. Before this incident, I consistently made an effort to contribute positively. As both a regular player and a CO/NCO, I was very active on the server. As a good example of my previous behavior, I had a clean record with no bans, warnings, kicks, or sits. I’ve always taken pride in following the rules and supporting the community in any way I could. This situation was out of character for me, and I recognize what led to the ban. If given a second chance, I do not plan on taking it lightly. I plan to return as a respectful and constructive member of the community. Thank you for taking the time to read my re-appeal. Additional Information: N/A

+1 would be nice to have different tools than just siting there with a pickaxe for hours on end, and it would bring interesting RP to the ministry of labor as they have to track who own the tool and more

The world model for certain weapons is a known issue, due to this and the time that this report has been up I will be moving this to documented for the time being.

You kind of said it yourself here within your last statement regarding this PK: You shot someone for pointing a gun at you, you pulled out your gun, shot and killed him; so you quite literally started a gunfight, and died in the process. Denied. If you have any further information regarding this PK you can contact me via Discord under the username spiralvv

hendrik baumer is in the baumer family i think

Truth!!@!@

Panzers have plenty of gear customization lwky

This would be good because of the expansion it could bring to a common activity on the server, +1

More props are always better for the server +1

Denied. To begin with, you detained the NSB chief on two separate occasions without any real legitimate cause, you also started dragging him around, and then stole items from him. These actions alone were highly illegal, and you were way out of your depth here as a HAUPTMANN of the Feldjagers to detain the NSB chief with little justification. Following that, you proceeded to order the detainment of the entire NSB for "breaking in" whilst they were serving a PCO, when they were let inside the ICC by a member of the military. The series of actions you took fully justifies the PK, considering the full context of the situation.

Yeah