Altoid

https://gyazo.com/05d6e3165edb1030c79e800e3f29bb07 chattington von gpt should be your underboss

again, arne did everything. not me.

Character's name & rank: Yorick Minghausen. Obergrenadier SteamID32: STEAM_0:1:567801681 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): Coffee Explain why you were PK'd: Was given the reason of it being "UA approved" Why should you be un-PK'd?: If i were to assume why I was really pked is because i was associated with arne minghausen, he has threatened john ritter's life several times over advertisements, I however have not threatened anyone or have done anything to be pk approved. According to Coffee it was approved on both of us, but I didn't do anything. Additional Information: Arne did and said essentially everything, his pk valid, mine invalid

ceo of d1 crashouts

im not sure who this is

+1

haha

I'm arguing that it wasn't RDM or FailRP, the rule states that a PK is authorized if deemed necessary by UA, or if it is RDM, or FailRP. Gary thought it was RDM and regardless of that he was going to issue a 2 rank demotion for it, once he found out it wasn't RDM (meaning it didn't fall under the last part of the rule "RDM or FailRP") and it fell under the "If UA deems it necessary" portion of the rule then he decided to full PK me. He thought it was RDM and was going to 2 rank demote me but once he found out that it wasn't RDM then he wanted to full PK me. What exactly changed when he saw the clip (2), the clip showed that it wasn't RDM or FailRP, and the PK guidelines state that dying after initiating a gun fight is a Derank UNLESS it's deemed RDM or FailRP, or if UA deemed it necessary. Maybe I'm explaining this weird, I hope the person reviewing this can understand what I'm saying, based on your response it's very clear you didn't understand what I was explaining in the sit about how it doesn't make sense.

Character's name & rank: Hauptfeldwebel Markus Köehler (mgd) SteamID32: STEAM_0:1:567801681 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): Carried out by Aurelius of Phoenix Approved by Gary Explain why you were PK'd: Dying after initiating a gun fight Why should you be un-PK'd?: I pulled aside one member of the MGD to have a word with him, he followed me, as well as Norman Baker and a few others. This was meant to be a private discussion between myself, Norman and the member of the MGD but Levi refused to leave, he was in the doorway and didn't backup after being asked too very nicely before I pulled a gun on him and warned him to go. I warned him with my gun and put him under what I thought to be fear-rp, he was given a little over 30 seconds to move back and he refused, I then pulled a gun out and I shot him, after shooting him I was gunned down by the people behind me who I believed to be on my side. I believed them to be on my side considering I was appointed the deputy. I was brought to a sit, shown the clip by Aurelius. The clip (clip named 1) I was shown by him had no audio to it whatsoever and it showed a visual glitch on the clippers end showing me have my gun on safety and then proceeding to shoot him, he was told the people who brought him the clip told him what happened, explained the clip and what was going on regardless of there being no audio. I explained it was a visual glitch, after explaining he said that I RDM'ed him and I explained that I had a gun pointed at him and I was warning him to back-up, he then said I initiated a gun fight, granted he was but I assumed it wasn't RDM because I had a gun pointed at him and told him to move and gave him about 30 seconds before I shot him and was then shot myself. Gary showed up and asked if there was a glitch in the video because "it looks like you pulled a gun out and shot him" and then I tried to explain the visual glitch and he goes "okay you can PK him then" and disappears, I then tried to dispute my case with aurelius because I didn't think it was a full PK because it stated in the PK guidelines "Dying after initiating a shoot-out [De-rank (Low Administration), a PK may be authorized by UA if deemed necessary or if it falls under RDM and/or FailRP]" The situation wasn't RDM because it wasn't random and there was a good amount of context to it and it wasn't failrp, with that being said I'm assuming gary "Deemed it necessary" I think it's very important that I emphasize that he approved all this on a clip (1) that had no audio and was clearly screwed up. After he disappeared I tried to dispute my case with Aurelius because I was frustrated, I offered to show him my clip (2) where he watched it and asked me if I was blocking him in a doorway and had a gun to back-up, I clarified that he was blocking me in a doorway and I was trying to get him to move to close the door because of the privacy of the conversation. I tried to argue that if it was RDM then it'd be a full PK but I believed it not to be and I believed him to be under fear-rp, I requested for another admin as an opinion/to explain it better as well as requesting several times for gary to explain his reasoning so I could show my clip, give him the context of the screwed up clip (1) he watched and pk'ed me based off of, he ignored me and pk'ed my regardless of my somewhat fair request of Gary coming so I can explain some stuff. I get on another character I made another clip trying to file a pk on the person I supposedly thought I put under fear-rp in the doorway and broke it when he didn't listen to the demand, after he watched the clip he asked for like sort of the full context of the situation in the clip and the situation in the admin sit that I was PK'ed in, he explained some things about how it wasn't fear-rp because he had a gun out and I didn't attempt to arrest him or any of that and in conclusion it wasn't a pk because it wasn't him breaking fear-rp because there was no fear-rp to break to begin with and how I can't "fear-rp" someone to back out of a room or any of that. Gary appeared and chimed in saying that he approved me to get a 2 rank demotion by Aurelius and got in the sit when I started disputing it, however when he got in the original sit with Aurelius he said nevermind and to full PK me, he didn't explain anything, he came to the sit when I started disputing it and changed his mind, I also want to emphasize that this wasn't said at all during the sit and I was put under the influence that I was getting a full PK, what made me think this was because he kept trying to say it wasn't fear-rp and how it was RDM, not once did he try to explain it was a demotion, I tried to explain to gary that I thought I was getting full pk'ed and then Gary told me he told Aurelius to 2 rank demote me and then a note for RDM, I said that's not what he said and he told me he didn't give a fuck about what he said and then Hound asked me if that's all I said yes and he returned me. In the beginning when Gary came into the second sit he was explaining how he explained to me all the context and stuff about why I was pked but he said a single sentence to Aurelius that sentence being "Was there a glitch in the video? Because it looks like he just pulled out his gun and shot him, okay, you can pk him then" so I don't understand this whatsoever because he originally thought it was RDM on my end because of the messed up clip (1) and that he was going to 2 rank demote me for the RDM but then he was given the context about how it wasn't RDM and he changed his mind and ruled upon a full PK (before seeing the clip (2) ) The PK guideline said that the de-rank is authorized however a pk can be authorized if it was rdm or fail rp, meaning if it was RDM it would be a full PK, he thought it was RDM and wanted to demote me but when he found out it wasn't then he decided to full PK me and that's not really adding up to me whatsoever. Additional Information: Clip (1) https://medal.tv/?contentId=igO7uiD6u6heyNXmg&invite=cr-MSxPVTgsMjA2NzEyOTQ1LA&spok=d1337vFUW2yA - Clip that gary went off of that he was originally going to demote me and note me for. - No audio and it's a trimmed 13 second clip with no context. - Visual glitch showing my gun was in safety regardless of it not being in safety. - Viewed by Gary before he approved 2 rank demotion. Clip (2) https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/igO7Lqk3VIxi1Mczw/d1337RKGbPF6?invite=cr-MSx4cHMsMjI0MTMzNTY4LA - Longer clip showing more context. - Has Audio - Visual glitch not present meaning it was client sided on the person who clipped (1) - Shows no RDM or Fail RP leading up to the gun fight. - Wasn't viewed by Gary before he PK'ed me. I understand that it wasn't fearRP but I also don't think it was RDM or FailRP, and I am confident that it wasn't necessary for a full PK to take place, not even Gary thought it was necessary when he assumed it was RDM, only when I started disputing it in the sit did he approve it, he approved it without my clip and without proper context on my end and I don't think it was fair that I wasn't heard out. I want to give a quick disclaimer, in no way am I talking trash about Gary or Aurelius during this appeal I just don't believe it was a valid PK, I'm not saying either a bad staff members, because they aren't, I am simply stating that I think this to be one of the rare few unfair pk's considering the context of what lead up to its approval, why it was approved, and all of that. I hope whoever staff member reviewing this can also recognize where I'm coming from with this appeal and hopefully can unPK me. I appreciate to whichever staff member has to review this incredibly long appeal. - altoid

+1 good fella

whatd you do

+1 would be good if kept active and managed properly

+1 good fella

https://gyazo.com/cbd640b427e29016de18d5eb83dfa73a ok man

erp and alting, great combo