mEEm

+1 hes sharp

+1 real

The ban was applied on June 8th, 2024. https://bans.prn.gg/?player=STEAM_0:0:574591023 Your last appeal was also written using AI. You should mention that, as it shows integrity and remorse.

Please be honest in your appeal; own up to the truth, how (relatively) recent your ban was, and previous appeals. Lying just gets appeals denied and if it happens enough times you will be banned and unable to appeal further.

Nah I want my fent

Reminder that you should not be commenting on PK appeals unless you're directly involved.

-1 did not cook

+1

It’s standard practice for reported staff to reply to the reports. Your report was actually sent to me by a member of UA shortly after being posted specifically because that reply is expected. Your own clip shows that you had the opportunity to leave and declined it by running away from the open gate, and that the soldier was patient and did not fire on you for several seconds, and even then only fired warning shots to warn you that he was willing to fire the weapon. You disregarded this situation and are now feigning ignorance of your own mischief in the hopes it’ll deceive UA. Dishonorable. Other than the loaded gun, armed soldier, him previously telling you to leave, and the warning shots? Wrong. Staff are permitted to intervene in an IC occurrence if it is deemed that one party has a disregard for the situation and RP. This happens regularly, such as minges being kicked during speeches - yelling insults repeatedly at someone during a planned out and organized speech (i.e. presidential inauguration) isn’t an unheard of thing in real life, but it will still often see someone punished OOCly (gagged or kicked) because their behavior is considered broadly unthinking and idiotic. It happens. I'm not going to reply further unless requested to; I’ve made my point and responded to yours.

Your interaction with Valorant and your POs both indicate the broad disregard you have for both the rules and for basic politeness, common sense, and critical thinking skills. You were not “going to the exit”; you explicitly ignored the commands of someone with a gun while being a clown and are now feigning ignorance as though you didn’t know you were being a nuisance. As I said before, the soldier did not shoot you until after you were well past the Bendlerblock and even then did not try to kill you, but instead to hit your legs and capture you. Trying to loophole the rules by pretending like him shooting at you twice gives you leeway to do whatever you please as though he doesn’t still have a loaded gun aimed at you, further demonstrates how little you actually care. You acted like a minge, and were handled accordingly. Then when you were being *properly compensated* for having been RDMed, you freaked out on another staff member and threatened to report them. It goes to show the complete disregard you have for the staff team and the server.

Hello. I am the staff member in question for this report. Thank you for filing a report. You had been breaking FearRP during this situation. You accessed the ICC illegally and the soldier tried to escort you out through the front gate; instead you behaved like an idiot and ran for the garage exit. The soldier had his weapon pointed at you and demonstrated restraint and patience and did not fire on you until you were beyond the Bendlerblock and had repeatedly disobeyed his obvious desire for you to stop. I had seen your POs and knew of your previous permanent ban which you earned by being a nuisance of the discord. I decided that instead of letting you give this soldier a likely unsatisfying conclusion where he shoots you and then you, a random civilian of no particular value to him, is PKed; I decided to allow him the option of trialing you or turning you over to police if he chose, rather than let the scenario be ruined by your tomfoolery. I'm not sure what the clip is meant to show, other than that I did freeze and tie you (which is not in contention). What's left out of this trimmed clip is the discussion I had with you afterwards, where I explained that you were being frozen so as to allow the soldier (who had displayed a regard for the roleplay scenario) to capture you, rather than be left annoyed and dissatisfied. Additionally after this, you made a ticket 'can karl frudel please untie me i'm stuck'. I then came over and untied you since you seemingly couldn't be untied by the soldier. You made a ticket some minutes after for RDM, which was claimed by @Valorant. Here is an image of your interaction with him seen through logs. You gave him the character ID of the person who killed you, and Valorant began the sit. When Valorant agreed with your ticket and stated that he would give the offender a verbal warning, you agreed to this light punishment. Then, while Valorant explained the situation to the offender, you began to shout and scream calling him a retard and saying he was being abusive, in both voice chat and in text after being gagged (as seen in the above screenshot). He gagged you, calmly explained to you the reasoning and how to file a staff report if you believed his actions were abusive, and then he ungagged you and returned you. It is abundantly clear from both of these interactions that you have very little regard for the server, for roleplay in general, or for the staff team. Threatening to file staff reports over a staff member politely explaining a situation to you is a unique level of intellectual disability. Harassing people who volunteered to spend their time keeping the community as enjoyable for the playerbase as possible, is honestly pathetic and I hope sincerely that you can get out of this habit. Good night, meem

+1 solid application from a longtime player

Preface: The two word limit sections below are identical to my previous application; I have read over them and considered the possibility of rewriting them, but I have decided that they do still represent my opinions on staffing and the staff team, my approaches to staffing, and overall hold true still. All other sections have been updated to be current. Introduction Information Section Steam Name: TheSuperTsar SteamID32: STEAM_0:1:225957226 Discord Username/ID: meem7637 Timezone: EST (S. Carolina) Age: 19 Time Played (check with !time): 1w 6d 9h 14m Your current rank(User/Donator/Trusted): Donator (fmr. moderator) Do you have a mic & will you use it?: Yes and Yes Are you consistently active on the forums and server?: Yes and Yes Did anyone from the Recruitment Team assist you in making your application?: Aris Staff Recommendations (Sponsors will be asked to verify): Saint, Saito, Coca Cola Man, Kalizar Basic Information Section IC Character names, ranks, and brief overview of their duties/everyday activities in a list format: Werner August Graf von Lindemann, businessman, politician, scientist. Nobosuke Tagomi, unused, Japanese businessman Obergefreiter Chuck Sneed, new member of the Kaisergarde meem, my former staff character Matrose Huey Hanngrenes, a fervent sailor and defender of the ICC How long have you been roleplaying?: October 2018 Have you received any infractions i.e Notes/Bans? If so, what were they for and what could you have done to prevent getting them next time?: According to staff member Jacob, I have no bans or notes. As in my last appeal, I did have a long history of infractions prior to 2021. Staff Knowledge Section What previous experience so you have as a staff member either within Garry’s Mod or the Nutscript Gamemode?: I was a staff member on Diverge as well as on the old Burst networks. I've also done minor work with nutscript related to cosmetic appearances and factions. I have also been staff here on Prometheus from May to November, when I resigned to focus on the new Navy school I had entered. Why do you believe we should pick you for the Prometheus Networks Staff Team? [300 words or more]: In short, I'm a longstanding and well-liked member of the community who has aided the UA team in several projects, including the recently made National Archive released by Virus. In long form, I've got a very strong dedication to the server. I've been engaged in the server since it launched, even before Typhon collapsed. I've been trusted for about a month now, and though it is a relatively nice thing to have, it is limited in how helpful I can be with people. I recognize why it's limited, and why it has to be limited, but as far as being genuinely helpful for as many people as possible, staff is simply the better way to go. From my previous time as staff on Diverge and tinkering in singleplayer, I know most of the commands for staffing. In all my time on the server, I've tried to do what I can to make the server better or generally more enjoyable. Helping new players find jobs or certain buildings, volunteering for trusted, and helping UA with warplanning and documentation. Staffing is the next step up in making this server a better and more pleasant place for everyone. I've just now finished high school, and won't be shipping out until mid-autumn. With no significant time commitments, I can spend more time staffing than most people could. I'm already on at least decent terms with most staff members, and I'm not afraid to ask questions or request help with particularly difficult situations or players. I'm also not a one track mind, and can recognize the grey areas within the rules that allow for some leeway with regards to punishment. The point of the staff team is not to punish people, the objective of the staff team is to help players and make their experience and time on the server as enjoyable as possible, and I will acknowledge and maintain regard for that objective during my time on the staff team. What are the duties and responsibilities of the position you are applying for in your own words? [150 Words or more]: The duties of a moderator, as the first level of the staff team, are relatively simple. Taking tickets, both to aid players with rulebreakers and helping them with IC matters (model changes, plytransfers, etc) comprises 90 percent of what moderators have to do frequently. When there's no tickets to take, it's best to noclip around to watch for issues like players stuck in each other or doors, proptrapping, or anything else that a player needs help with. A professional attitude and demeanor is required when handling new players, who might not understand the server or its rules, as well as intentionally disruptive players who try to goad a reaction or just generally infuriate people. I always try to be patient with people, which is a necessity with tickets -- treating both sides of a sit evenly, avoiding excessive punishment, and delicately and calmly explaining to unknowing rulebreakers what precisely was unacceptable about what they did and what rule they violated, so that they aren't left confused or unsure of what they actually did wrong. Patience, caution, discretion and diligence are imperative for the staff team, and I genuinely believe that I can meet these virtues as needed for staff. Preface but at the bottom: The two word limit sections above are identical to my previous application; I have read over them and considered the possibility of rewriting them, but I have decided that they do still represent my opinions on staffing and the staff team, my approaches to staffing, and overall hold true still. All other sections have been updated to be current.

Hello, I’m the staff member who banned you. Firstly, you’ve been in this game mode for years. You should have a reasonable expectation of what is and isn’t a usual or acceptable thing to say. You made a false allegation of a sexual assault, in OOC chat. This is obviously behavior that isn’t normal. I chose to handle it one-on-one rather than embarrass you by muting you or scolding you in OOC. I brought you to the Bendlerblock courtroom office and asked you whether you believed what you said to be a socially normal, acceptable thing to say. You said you believed it was. I asked you why you said it, and you said because it was true. I then asked why you believed that, and you replied that “It just is.” If the joke was actually funny or even just an attempt at an actual joke, I wouldn’t have bothered to even speak to you. If you said it was just a joke, I'd have returned you with a verbal warning. Instead you decided you wanted to dig a deeper hole and continue with the accusation. We spoke for about a minute and a half while I checked your notes and consulted the rules, and during that time you never tried to claim your statement was a joke. I did not berate you as you claim. I said the behavior you exhibited was “freakish” and unusual, and called you a retard in OOC chat. Up to this point, OOC chat had been fairly out of pocket with people talking about femboys and similar. Even statements like those got a couple people muted or kicked by other staff for crossing the line. I can understand if you thought that your comment would’ve been acceptable as borderline but in the end allowed, under the specific context of the ongoing OOC messages. Global rules are not anything special, and they don’t have to come with a higher standard or punishment; they’re only global because they apply to all platforms. The ban was applied in order to give you an opportunity to take a break and look briefly at what you said, rather than as a punishment, since you refused to recognize what the issue was with what you had said. Again, if you had recognized it or said it was a joke there wouldn’t have been a need to ban you. After the ban was applied you messaged me (https://imgur.com/a/dCstx6Q) showing your continued refusal to have any self awareness. Given your willingness to apologize now, it’s clear you’ve calmed down and gotten into a better mindset. I’d be willing to see the ban repealed and scrubbed since it’s fulfilled its original purpose. For what it’s worth, I don’t have any experience as a witness to or victim of sexual assault, but I knew people in school and boot camp who were and were deeply affected by it. I appreciate your apology and the recognizance it demonstrates. In the future, you should have some self awareness. I can see how my statement about Britain's sexual assault problem prompted you to continue on that sort of track, but the intent was more so a discussion about the insufficiencies in British law enforcement, and how generally silly England is.