S Compton

First, I Never said you were the one who directly shot me, I said you were the one who gave the order to attack, and lead the men to do so through, your own Claim, thus making you the one who broke my legs and the reason I was shot Second, You can be behind the forces and still be the one leading the charge by organizing the men and telling them to charge and then actively taking part in the combat, even if you walk like a Lame Duck into the fray. Thirdly, Your the one who said that you lead the charge, that you had ordered the men, Refused to answer who really gave the order then doubled down on having given the order yourself. The reason your assume blame for me being shot is the fact you said you ordered the men around who shot me, Your order was the direct result of that, and you could neither give me the man who did it ( Understandable ) Nore would you give me the person nore blame the person who really Did it ( Were you made your mistake ), Thus you left me with no way to follow a lead on who did this except for pointing the loaded gun and question at your own head. So in conclusion, this makes you: A). Directly Responsible for me being shot B). Giving no other option but to let the blame fall upon yourself C). Showing that any other action taken clearly pointed to being directed at you, There was chances given to redirect this, you refused and stood strong, Admirable, But foolish in a case were you charged the Wolfs Lair, Open lt attacked it and then got captured.

Also Yes in the end it was confirmed off of orders of the Panzermarshal for you to be killed for your actions against his flak tower, You had admitted to leading the charge, refused to say who gave the order, and were un willing to state who had given the order unseen while you were seen leading the attack. You were given chance time and time again to deny haveing lead the attack as the highest ranking Person involved and to name who had done as such, You refused and openly said you had lead the attack, That you dont know who ordered the attack.

The reason I requested his PK was because he had led the forces in the attack against the Flak Tower. This happened even after I had ordered my own men to keep their guns down and not continue firing upon them, especially considering they had not fired on them in the first place. When he was eventually captured and brought before us, he openly stated that he had led the attack against the Flak Tower. He also admitted that he had been leading the men responsible for shooting me personally. These were the same men I was allowing up the ladder, only for them to suddenly open fire on me for seemingly no reason. I was wounded and survived, but with both of my legs broken. After he admitted to leading the attack, I asked him a very simple question: "Who gave the order to attack the Flak Tower?" This conversation happened in front of multiple witnesses, including the Panzer Marshal, the General der, and several other members of the military. His answer was clear: "No one gave the order. I was leading the charge. I was leading the charge." Even after that, I gave him multiple opportunities to clarify what had happened. I was being extremely lenient with him. I told him that if somebody else had actually ordered the attack, then he needed to tell us who it was and put it down in a witness statement. Even then, I gave him three more chances to tell us who had actually ordered the attack. His story continued changing. First, he said he did not know. Then he claimed he believed it was somebody in higher command. Then, finally, he went straight back to claiming that he had done it himself. TL;DR: I requested his PK because he repeatedly admitted, in front of multiple witnesses, that he personally led the attack on the Flak Tower. His men opened fire during that attack and wounded me, breaking both of my legs. I repeatedly gave him opportunities to identify someone else who had ordered the attack, but his answers changed from not knowing, to suggesting higher command, and then back to claiming that he himself had led it. The later written statement also appears inconsistent with what he originally told us. Witness to his admission: Panzermarshal Jack Bauer General Der Luftwaffe Lukas Reinheart Konteradmiral Hugo Vos LT Henirch Knix Gefreiter Mike Mahony Gefreiter Sabastian Schmidt Wolfgang Lieberfeld Here is also the Video, Just after his capture, One of the Witnesses names, Personally saw him leading the attack on the flak tower: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/nzaj0XqDxudU0Goco?invite=cr-MSxxVHEsMTYwNzYxNzQ1 Here is the video were you can See him leading the attack on the flack tower as him and his general both move to enter the Flack towers ( I would start it at 1:10) as thats when you see him give the order and move in with the large bulwark of his forces: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/nzadhzDV4I6QF5J2f?invite=cr-MSxkSVYsMTYwNzYxNzQ1

Well there is no use in arguing further, Its up to the adjudicator of this appeal to make the decision, I Listed why the rules apply in this instance and I still firmly believe that a PK was not the result any party should have allowed end of the day.

Hmm strange part is I never threatened his NSB chief, Nor did I call him a dog, I did say that he had failed to run every ministry that he has touched though! But even with this there was in my eyes no attempt past the Pk to rectify the situation. As the rules state as well a PK is a Last Resort! He could have instead: - Taken me to trial - Forced me into signing and Informant agreement - Threatened me with Dirt Or one of the many other things that should have been attempted before a PK was carried out. Also if I am correct NHC Pks of which still requires also proper permission for approval, the rules that I quoted from the PK list also supersede the rules you have posted as they are restrictions to all forms of Pks if I am correct. If not well sorry I am not the best reader most the time.

Character's name & rank: Hanswolf Peiper, Minister SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:98631715 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): Hound Explain why you were PK'd: I was Pked for shooting a Staff member who was playing and enlisted guy while swinging around the dead feldmarshals body, Genuinely thought they were a minge! Why should you be un-PK'd?: The charecter died in a anti climatic way and a couple days later the situation that lead to the Pk resulted in the Feldmarshal just being revived, Plus it might be a fun little event to bring back piper for a bit and have him start from the bottom and get to the top again or die trying. I want to try to do something different and more fun with the character this time around but it would require the old Char to do it! Additional Information: The main thing I request is if its possible I think it would be amazing and funny as hell to have him be brought back to life for a federal council meeting or warplanning meeting thus creating the circle advancing the Joke and then from there I can be told that I was replaced and told to find a new place for myself in Germany ect.

Also Not sure if this is right, while attempting to carry out the PK the first time the interior minister died along with some of his men, Not sure if thats the real reason i was being taken because prior I was trying to stop them from kidnapping prime, but if they were taking me to carry out this Pk and a soldier saw us getting taken and killed the Interior minister I think this means he died trying to carry out a PK! https://medal.tv/games/geforce-now/clips/jR7Agk3efcJhNgIfa?invite=cr-MSxQc0IsMTYwNzYxNzQ1LA

Character's name & rank: Jimmy Barlovo, Feldwebel SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:98631715 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): Coffee Explain why you were PK'd: I was told I was NHC Pked by the interior minister for calling him names 5-7 days prior, When I logged on today I was taken into a cell and shot without any real proper RP. Hell a trial would have been nice. Why should you be un-PK'd?: Well, as the character is an upstart, and considering they were killed off without any real reason or proper RP, I believe they should be allowed to live. From how things like this were handled in the past, I would expect situations like this to be handled differently. For example, the NSB could have kidnapped my character and forced him into being an informant under threat of death, or something more RP-creative, rather than simply killing off a character over a supposed verbal insult. A Perma-Kill should be a last resort, not a first response. As Whoreson has said himself, this RP isn’t just a "kill one another" simulator—it’s about the stories created, the rivalries formed, and the tension between characters that help drive the server’s roleplay and foster an engaging atmosphere. End of the day all this Pk has done is restarted a character that in my eyes and hopefully in the eyes of the reviewer shouldn't result in death being the first and foremost action taken against the Character. There are many other routes that could have been taken to Pk this NCO or to have advanced the RP into a more interesting direction and I would like to have the chance to see it advanced! Additional Information: I also know its not the wisest to insult a NHC member who was melting down like a child in the street, and I know the rules are not absolute but here's the ones that I feel back me up in this case. You may not kill someone or escalate a confrontation to murder just for verbal disrespect/argument. If someone continues to disrespect you, you may physically intimidate or hit them (Fists, melee weapon) as continued disrespect could realistically start a fight. The player then has free choice on how to respond/retaliate. If they choose to flee, you may not kill them. Not using PKs as a LAST resort. Attempt to resolve the matter using other means which don't involve PKing first, unless it is deemed impossible, and agreed upon by the approving staff member. The punishment must fit the crime. You cannot sentence someone to death for minor offenses; ie. not saluting [PK]