All Activity

Your Name: idfk but my steam name is France greatest soldier SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:739397257 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): apology? Which staff member banned you?: Whoreson How long is your ban for?: Perma Why were you banned?: Being a faggot Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: because everyone is a faggot and if everyone is a faggot no one is Additional Information: i don't even remember what i did so i got no clue what it even is i am appealing. im not a faggot though

Please follow the correct template. Name: SteamID32: Staff Member who issued the Flag Blacklist: Explain why your flags were blacklisted: Explain why your flags should be unblacklisted: Additional Information:

I had my PET tag perms revoked for something that was ordered back in april? Ive been in server many times as of resent and been using them for RP scenes and such. So i wonder if I can have my perms back so i can resume the RP and such

For context, on that day we had received news and reports that members of the NYPD were attempting to attack the base again after a day of attempted attacks. And of course, it happened again. They attacked the side entrance and even came to the front door, threatening to kill a member of the 91st if the feldmarshall did not appear. And again they came with the intention of "talking," and suddenly I heard one of the guys lockpicking the front door. And that's when I had to shoot because otherwise they would have come in. i dont have a clip cuz tbh i didnt think i was gonna be banned just for defending my base.

I am going to be completely honest here, because at this point I am becoming increasingly frustrated with how this appeal is being handled. After reading your response, I am struggling to understand what exactly you have reviewed and how you have arrived at the conclusion that my ban should remain in place. You state that you have reviewed the discussion, the logs, and my notes, yet your response does not address a single one of the inconsistencies I have brought up. Instead, you have chosen to focus on my track record and whether I personally convince you that I deserve to be unbanned. With all due respect, this is not supposed to be about whether I personally convince you that I deserve another chance. It is supposed to be about whether the punishment was justified in the first place. Those are two very different things, and I would appreciate it if that distinction were actually acknowledged. Let's address Maverick's statements, since those seem to be the foundation of this entire situation. Maverick claims that I was supposedly going around shooting people for no reason. Where is the evidence of this? Which players did I allegedly shoot? At what time did these incidents occur? Are there logs or clips demonstrating that I was responsible? I have repeatedly stated that I was at the military base and remained there. There was only one other person there besides me, so I would genuinely like to understand how this accusation is supposed to correspond with what actually happened. Then there is the rooftop allegation. Maverick specifically says, and I quote, "I saw you shooting people from a rooftop too i believe." I have already directly addressed this. I WAS NOT ON A ROOFTOP. I asked for a clip because I want to see what this accusation is based on. Instead of receiving footage or any meaningful clarification, I am now being told that I need to find my own evidence to defend myself. How am I supposed to provide footage disproving an incident that I maintain never happened? Surely the person making the allegation, or the staff member relying on it, should be able to provide something to substantiate it. Furthermore, Maverick openly admits that he is unsure whether I was responsible for the alleged LTAP, stating that he does not know if it was me or someone else. Why is this even being brought into the discussion? If the staff member responsible for the original punishment cannot confidently identify who committed an alleged violation, then it should not be treated as something that reflects negatively on me. Uncertainty is not evidence, and someone else's potential misconduct should not become part of my disciplinary record. Regarding my microphone, I have already acknowledged that it was malfunctioning. I was asked to fix it, and I did. I am not denying that there was an issue. However, I fail to see how a microphone malfunction, which I addressed when requested, somehow contributes to proving the much more serious allegations being made against me. Now, regarding your response specifically: You mention that you have reviewed the logs, but you have not actually explained what those logs demonstrate. You mention my track record, but you have not explained how it establishes that I committed any of the specific violations being discussed. You say that you are not personally convinced that my ban should be shortened or overturned, but you have not provided a single concrete explanation addressing why the original accusations should be considered substantiated. Frankly, this is an extremely disappointing way to handle an appeal. A staff member's personal impression of someone should never take precedence over the actual evidence surrounding a punishment. Having a previous disciplinary history does not automatically make every future accusation true. I should not have to spend the entirety of this appeal fighting against assumptions about my character instead of being given the opportunity to address the actual allegations. What makes this even more frustrating is that you are asking ME to provide clips and witnesses while seemingly overlooking the fact that the original staff member should have been able to substantiate the accusations that resulted in my punishment. The burden should not be shifted onto the person appealing simply because staff cannot provide a clear explanation of their own allegations. I am not asking you to take my word as absolute truth. I am asking you to demonstrate that the decision being made is based on something more substantial than recollections, assumptions, and personal opinions. If you have reviewed the logs, then please explain which specific logs support which specific accusations. If there is footage of me shooting people, provide it. If there is footage of me on a rooftop, provide it. If there is evidence that I resisted detainment, explain precisely what happened and when. If there is no definitive evidence identifying me as the person responsible for the alleged LTAP, then stop bringing it up as though it establishes anything about my conduct. I would also like to know whether you have actually questioned Maverick about these inconsistencies or simply accepted his recollection of events without further verification. Because from the outside, it genuinely looks like the accusations have been accepted at face value, while my responses have barely been acknowledged. I find it particularly ironic that I am being asked to provide evidence to make my case more convincing when I have already identified specific allegations that appear to be based on uncertainty and have explicitly requested the evidence behind them. That request has still not been meaningfully addressed. At this point, I would like both you and Maverick to provide an actual explanation rather than continuing to go in circles. I expect answers to the following: What specific evidence demonstrates that I was randomly shooting players? Where is the footage supporting the claim that I was shooting people from a rooftop? What exactly am I alleged to have done while supposedly resisting detainment? What evidence establishes that I was responsible for the alleged LTAP, considering Maverick himself admitted he was unsure? Which specific logs have you reviewed, and what do they demonstrate? Have these allegations been independently investigated, or has the appeal simply relied on the original staff member's recollection? How exactly does my previous track record establish that the specific allegations in this case are true? I do not think these are unreasonable questions. They are the absolute bare minimum I would expect to be answered when someone is being punished and is attempting to appeal that punishment. I would strongly suggest that the staff involved take another look at this situation, because the way this appeal has been addressed so far does not inspire confidence in the quality or impartiality of the review process. I am genuinely tired of having to repeatedly explain the same things while receiving responses that avoid the actual points being raised. If the evidence exists, show it. If the allegations are substantiated, explain how. If they are not, then I expect that to be acknowledged rather than having assumptions continuously used against me. I am not asking for a favour, special treatment, or an unearned second chance. I am asking for a fair and evidence-based review. That should not be an unreasonable expectation, and it certainly should not require me to repeatedly ask staff to substantiate the accusations they are using to justify keeping me banned. I would appreciate an actual response addressing the points above, rather than another statement about my track record, your personal opinion of whether I deserve to be unbanned, or a request for me to somehow prove that allegations without supporting evidence never happened. Thank you for your time, and I sincerely hope you have an absolutely wonderful day! I also hope that, perhaps next time, a little more time and attention can be dedicated to actually reviewing the allegations, examining the evidence, and addressing the concerns being raised rather than relying on personal impressions, vague recollections, and an individual's previous track record. I understand that thoroughly investigating something may be considerably more demanding than writing a paragraph explaining why you personally don't feel someone deserves an unban, but I would like to believe that this is not too much to expect from the people entrusted with handling disciplinary appeals. I would also like to thank Maverick for providing such a wonderfully detailed recollection of events, particularly the parts where he apparently isn't entirely sure whether I was involved, but somehow those uncertainties have still managed to become part of the discussion surrounding my punishment. Truly reassuring. Hopefully, both of you will find the time to revisit this appeal and provide something a little more substantial than what has been presented so far. A proper explanation, actual evidence, and answers to the questions raised would be a refreshing change of pace. Until then, I will eagerly await a response that addresses the substance of this appeal rather than another beautifully worded explanation of why my previous track record apparently makes evidence and due consideration optional. Once again, have a wonderful day! I certainly hope the remainder of it goes considerably better than this appeal review has.

But i recommend creating a new one.

Once you reach a week of in game time. not a week of waiting. just submit a new one once you have a week of play time in game. If you want you can use the same one.

Can I repost the same app after one week, If thats cool with y'all.

It's been a week, I guess it didn't say It's been a week in game, I'll wait a week ig

Appeal accepted. Your character will be unpk'd.

Hey, so, digging through logs for things you don't have screenshots about will prove nothing, because you were either here for none of it or made no actual note of importance ICly, as in you couldn't even remember what to say about this until you looked in logs for shit you wouldn't have ICly, to any of these previous, old ass adverts. You're simply looking for things that might be convenient to justify killing me post-tense. I'll explain these advertisements anyway. THE BAUMER COIN Also, has it ever occurred to you that maybe that I was completely bullshitting you about the properties of the coin, and its origins especially? I said sometimes it's here, sometimes it's there. I would not be able to give you the coin on the spot if it was anomalous how I said it, I just wanted to give you something interesting so you would LEAVE. Waffels Wilhelm never made the Baumer Coin. It was Cooke E. Baker, you were correct the first time, but had to CHECK LOGS FOR OUR CHAT SO YOU COULD "REMEMBER", AND PULL THE ADVERTISEMENTS OUT OF YOUR ASS AND USE THEM AGAINST ME HERE, and the coins are a public knowledge thing. They have never been private. They have never been secret or anomalous. You never inquired about those natures, you never actually wanted to learn what you were talking about. You wanted to put a layer of mystery behind my bullshit, so you could kill me for what you didn't actually want to understand. Edit: You also called the Bamer coin a piece of radioactive / nuclear material. You're full of shit. THE GANGLISH CLOUD And, that thing about the cloud of gas with a Ganglish accent, was a fucking staff member. Firebombing my house. I was making a funny advertisement about something completely incomprehensible and RPwise, completely untrue. It was total bullshit, and wouldn't exist if not for bullshit. I once made an advert for somebody throwing microwaved eggs in my factory because a staff member was throwing flashbangs around and fucking around, causing me to get raided by the military, arrested for no reason, and even spawned a flashbang in my inventory. That's what we call powergame, except I wouldn't be bitching about this if it wasn't used to try to justify killing me, past-tense. THE "OTHER GAS ATTACKS" Guess what. Richard Bellick threw gas, molotovs and frags into my establishment, countless times, because he wanted to. And I announced this each time, I announced that a member of the fucking military kept attacking my facility. This wasn't anomalous at all, nor was it an Ouroboros concern, whatsoever. Me, getting my business attacked by terrorists, is not a fucking Ouroboros interest. This belongs to the NSB or the ABI. The Ouroboros is a RESEARCH GROUP. You are not supposed to be a shortcut to killing people for a prosecution that has no evidence or any kind of business to do with you, so you couldn't serve the role regardless. SPECIAL MENTION "[Advertisement by Maylon Iyne] There was no probable cause for the military to enter my facility and declare a gas leak that doesn't exist, as this facility does not contain gaseous substances of any kind. The only way there would be gas in my building is if somebody has planted a gas weapon. They also said I had drugs, and then proceeded not to find any and instead break open all my doors." Hey, this whole advertisement is a fucking disclaimer. This advertisement is me denying, like you said I should've been doing in these forums, but told me explicitly not to deny ingame, THIS IS ME DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS MADE IN PUBLIC ADVERTISEMENTS. The allegations that there was a gas leak, that my facility was unsafe, and that I was making drugs inside. You could not be any more clueless if you tried. These advertisements are far out of context, you took them out of context and you never had the context to begin with, because you sifted through logs for them.

I can't provide screenshots as these were days old at this point, but I have messages that you can back up with staff. As seen in this "[Advertisement by Maylon Iyne] NOBODY BETTER HAVE COME AND TOUCHED MY BAUMER COIN COLLECTION. THEY WERE VERY HARD TO GET ALL 7 METALS." it isnt the first time he used his dupe in the city. He then proceeds to explain how his other character from Berlin made it, Maylon Iyne says "it's a baumer coin, one of twenty printed by Waffels Wilhelm" I decided I would confine with the RH and Scientists there and decided that from his past records, that being the adverts about gas that talk, "[Advertisement by Maylon Iyne] A floating cloud of gas, highly melanated, with a thick Ganglish accent, has set my home on fire at the Dreadfort. Utterly atrocious. Make sure your stoves are turned off, people." and other adverts about gas attacks on places he owns or from him himself. "[Advertisement by Maylon Iyne] There was no probable cause for the military to enter my facility and declare a gas leak that doesn't exist, as this facility does not contain gaseous substances of any kind. The only way there would be gas in my building is if somebody has planted a gas weapon. They also said I had drugs, and then proceeded not to find any and instead break open all my doors."

The Ouroboros is not supposed to have a perspective on a completely non-anomalous civilian, they are not supposed to storm his property with 7 armed men, the director is not supposed to threaten a civilian running a barhouse not to fight completely unfounded asspulled allegations of the procurement of radioactive material, and they are not supposed to try and kill people without reason. Yes, they are powerful. Yes, they are shady. No, they are not supposed to just kill whoever they like and lie to staff and on the forums about why. No, they're especially not supposed to involve themselves in something they don't know certainly is part of their business. The NYPD is the primary policing force, and the MPs are the ones in charge of the Frontier. It is their job to investigate me, and if it was anomalous, it would definitely go to the Ouroboros. Assuming what you said was true, about being told any of this, you would still realistically be saying "why are you coming to me about this? go to the NYPD". Unfortunately, you don't seem interested enough in what you're actually doing to counter the argument at all, instead you told Kurti to set me active because you're a General and you said so. Key takeaways: - You told me NOT to deny the allegations, that we weren't there to argue - You told me to shut up and listen, agree to everything you said or you'd turn on the gas chamber you brought me to - You lied about making me cry over a PK, which, you're weird. https://streamable.com/n00ifo

This is what I said over a UA ticket, and I'm placing that here. You refuse to justify the PK, by including the source of your information that I was "selling illegal material". You haven't said what this "illegal material" is, and if you were going to dare say drugs, you would have confessed a terribly poor knowledge of my character, because there's literally no case where anybody has ever legally or legitimately found drugs on Maylon. There have been multiple times where I was falsely arrested, declared in possession of something and released without charges. There have been multiple illegal raids on my property, illegitimate actions that cannot result in a PK when they lie. You lied. Illegal material is purposefully ambiguous, vague, so that I can't even counter the argument. There's nothing for me to fight if I don't know what I'm fighting here, as Maylon, like every single other civilian in the server, does indeed make and sell illegal drugs to the black market, but you would have literally no way of knowing that ICly. Also, even if you did want to go after me for the illegal material, you wouldn't head the whole PK with "he's trying to build an atomic bomb!! he has nuclear material!" while in the cargo container. This was weak to begin with. TLDR: This is explicitly powergame, because you lied. You said I among other things have declared and advertised being in possession of nuclear and illegal material, that way you could justify killing me.

hello, I'm currently at work and would like to respond to the latest response by Sayako trying to justify killing maylon by blatantly lying I cannot give that response currently, I have to be home to show what I have to show, but immediately you can see him trying to refuse to actually write down why specifically he killed me after being called out for lying he wants to shift the reasoning behind why he shot me, when it was made known originally he was going to try and kill me for nuclear material that I didn't have Codda — 10:42 AM he refuses to actually justify, but says I had anomalous materials and gas leaks, which gas leaks in a factory are absolutely not reason to kill a civilian factory owner, nor were there any actual gas leaks to begin with. the first "gas leak" advertisement I made was in favor of the VSK during the zenin towers raid, so nobody would question why I was boarded up and hiding I was explicitly told NOT to talk about not owning any anomalous resources, that what I had or did not have was not in question, I was told explicitly NOT to deny what I was being accused of Codda — 10:51 AM by a source he "wasn't going to disclose OOCly"he was told I was selling "illegal material" which is basically the entire civilian economy, and anyone and everyone has been saying it, raiding my properties with no warrant, finding nothing and then still tearing my place up for no reason

Hello, Per the staff guidelines you need to have at least a week playtime to apply for staff. Feel free to apply again once you have hit a week playtime!

Introduction Information Section Steam Name: Bruce SteamID32 (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:1:913743672 Discord Username/ID: 𝕽𝖊𝖝/1469216010354819135 Timezone: CST Age: 19 Time Played (check with !time): 5 days, 22 hours, 19 minutes. Your current rank(User/Donator/Trusted): User Do you have a mic & will you use it?: Yes, Also yes. Are you consistently active on the forums and server?: I’m very active on the server, but not on the forums. This is my first time using the forums. I lost my old phone and couldn’t get back into my old Steam account since lost the phone and it had all of my passowords on it, so I had to make a new one. Since then I’ve only played on the server and haven’t used the forums before. Did anyone from the Recruitment Team assist you in making your application?: No, I'm here on my own behalf applying. No one else is assisting me to make an application, and that's it. Staff Recommendations (Sponsors will be asked to verify): I don't have any recommendations or staff recommendations. I'm just here on my own behalf applying. Basic Information Section IC Character names, ranks, and brief overview of their duties/everyday activities in a list format: Anwärter Paul Damen, Inspector of Civil Affairs. Handles civil paperwork and talks with citizens. Gefreiter Fritz Brandt, VSK 1st Volkssicherheitskräfte Division “Bahr”. Works to keep the people of the Protectorate secure in New York, enforces orders and mandates from the Generalkommissar, and carries out legal orders as part of the enforcement branch of the Nationales Sicherheitsburo/National Security Bureau. How long have you been roleplaying?: I have been roleplaying since 2024, so about two years across other servers and communities. On this server I have 5 days, 22 hours, and 19 minutes of playtime. Have you received any infractions i.e Notes/Bans? If so, what were they for and what could you have done to prevent getting them next time?: No, I have not received any bans or notes on this server. If I ever do, I would read what it was for, learn from it, and make sure it does not happen again. Staff Knowledge Section What previous experience so you have as a staff member either within Garry’s Mod or the Nutscript Gamemode? Yes, I have staff experience. I was a trial mod on a Warhammer military server. I was close to becoming a full mod, but I stepped away and later retired from it. I have no experience with the NutScript gamemode. Why do you believe we should pick you for the Prometheus Networks Staff Team?[300 words or more]: I think I would be a good fit for the Prometheus Networks staff team because I have put a lot of time into this server and I care about it. I have almost six days of playtime on two characters, Paul Damen and Fritz Brandt. Paul is an Inspector of Civil Affairs and Fritz is a Gefreiter in the VSK, so I have played on both the civilian side and the military side of the server. That helps me understand what different players want out of a scene. I have been roleplaying since 2024, and I have played on other servers outside of this one. I also have staff experience. I was a trial mod on a Warhammer military server, and I was close to becoming a full mod. I stepped away because I had real life issues to deal with, and I later retired from it. I am not hiding that, because I think it is better to be honest about where I have been. It still gave me a look at what staff are expected to do, and it showed me that I want to be on a team like that again. I am very active on the server. I am not active on the forums yet, because this is my first time using them. I lost my old phone and could not get back into my old Steam account, so I had to make a new one. I have only ever played on the server before this, so I am still learning how the forums work. I do not have any experience with the NutScript gamemode, and I will be honest about that. If I am not sure about something, I will ask instead of guessing. If I am picked, I will follow the rules myself, listen to everyone involved before I make a decision, and treat players fairly whether they are a friend or a stranger. I would rather explain a rule and give a warning first than jump straight to a punishment. I will take feedback from higher staff and own my mistakes. What I want most is for people to enjoy roleplaying here and feel welcome, and I would like to help new players and answer questions. I will take the role seriously and represent Prometheus Networks well. What are the duties and responsibilities of the position you are applying for in your own words? [150 Words or more]: The position I am applying for is Trial Moderator. I understand that this is the first step on the staff team, below admin and the higher ranks. I want to start here because I would like to learn everything the right way. I am happy to be a trial mod for one week, two weeks, or however long the team wants, so they can see how I do. As a trial moderator, I understand that my job is to help keep the server fair and fun for everyone. I would follow the rules myself and set a good example for other players. I would answer questions when I can and help players who are confused about the rules. If someone breaks a rule, I would handle it with the tools and commands I am allowed to use, and I would not abuse them. When I am not sure what to do, I would ask a higher staff member instead of guessing. I would listen to feedback, learn from my mistakes, and work with the rest of the team. My goal during the trial is to learn how things work and show that I can be trusted with more later.

Hi @Donamyslu! After viewing the discussion and reviewing the logs and your long list of notes. I am wondering if there is any sort of evidence on your end that you could provide to help your case, as I am not seeing anything that would make me personally believe to elevate or shorten this ban. Based on your track record, it does not scream to me that you should be unbanned. Of course, you have the chance to provide evidence. Take the time to find clips, or others who witnessed this situation, and have them respond to this thread. Thank you, Have a wonderful day!

Hi @Niko! After viewing the discussion, I am left with a few more questions. I managed to find your SteamID after looking through the logs and it appears you have 3 previous RDM notes, which contributed to this 10-day ban. Do you have any clips or eye witnesses that could attest more to this situation? Perhaps it could help towards lightening the ban or removing it in total.

@Sayako Please provide any screenshots of the advertisements you may have. As said by Whoreson, the only mention of nuclear being: "[Y] Maylon Iyne: I HAVE PROOF I'M NOT AT ALL POISONED NOR AM I IN POSSESSION OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL" HarryB never was "making downright retarded adverts about gas leaks and you owning illegal materials". If you don't have any screenshots, your entire reasoning to kill him was because of a special coin.

Hi @Slopasaurus Thanks for making a PK-Appeal. After reviewing the discussion, it appears you we're pk'd under our guidelines of Gunfight Initiation. During the situation, you are observed to be the first one to open fire. Although you we're ordered by command to do this over the radio, you we're still the first individual to fire. This makes your character eligible for a Pk because the civil war was already concluded, and by this time, it was in the latter half of the night. Despite you being ordered to do so, you as your own character could make the choice to not listen and save your own life rather than fulfill the request of your commanding officers. For future reference, put yourself in the shoes of your character and think about an action deeply before committing to it. Every time you are prompted the opportunity to fire, think of the risk in your own mind and how they could affect your character. Below I will paste in the community guidelines on pk's, I highly suggest you read through them, then commit to making another character. PK Guidelines - Prometheus Networks Wiki Have a wonderful day! Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked

Hi @Masterbaitor Thanks for making a PK-Appeal. After reviewing the discussion, it appears you we're pk'd under our guidelines. However, In the manner the pk was done, and in the way the situation played out. I believe this to be an exception on the FearRP rule, without outside context to the situation whatsoever. It appears that the requestor's of the PK, shot you for no reason, and attempted to put your character under fear-RP, and during which, shot you multiple times. The Requestor's side had no control of the men surrounding him, which resulted in you having virtually no option or time to make a choice in the situation. Your character should be unbanned the next time you enter the server, if there is an issue with it, please make a ticket in the discord. Have a wonderful day! Appeal: Approved Thread: Locked

Hi @Georgina Floyd Thanks for making a PK-Appeal. After reviewing the discussion, it appears you we're pk'd within our PK-Guidelindes, under FearRP. Because of the evidence put forward, the clip I have received and looked over, and supported by logs, I have come to the choice that your character was pk'd within the guidelines of our rules. If this has confused you, or you wish for more clarity on the situation, please take the time to familiarize yourself with our PK guidelines which I will post below. Just because the other officers may have been minging, does not give your character the permission to do as he pleases without the threat of death. A conscious decision was made and therefore resulted in the death of your character. PK Guidelines - Prometheus Networks Wiki Have a wonderful day! Appeal: Denied Thread: Locked

Hi @Stealth Thanks for making a PK-Appeal. After reviewing the discussion, it appears you we're pk'd without just cause and without approval from the appropriate staff. I would like to extend an apology to not reaching this appeal sooner, as it would have been an approval. I do hope you made another character in the NYPD, at this point the time-restraint to rejoin should be over. If it is not over, we could discuss fixing that for you immediately. Have a wonderful day! Appeal: Approved Thread: Locked

hi