Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 07/26/25 in Posts

  1. Ladies and Gentlemen. I give you the new, hot of the press Cannon Networks logo. Featuring Cannon Sunday. COMING 2026
    3 points
  2. What will you bring to MITHC? What kind of roleplay do you guys plan on doing/what factions do you plan on maining? It seems like it will be a huge drift from what we are used to so I'm interested in how people will make it their own.
    1 point
  3. When communism is achieved I am going to go be a cook and the caretaker of an ancestral healing spa. I will also be a teacher and teach the children about embodiment practices and becoming one with the world and nature.
    1 point
  4. +1 seems genuine plus Slickb is black soooo
    1 point
  5. Accepted. I spoke with the Interior Minister and the GSD Chief in a discord call and they agreed you should be unPkd. The reports given were not enough alone to shoot you. Contact a member of UA to get unPKd
    1 point
  6. Accepted. This is not being accepted because you are disputing it, or the banning staff member did something wrong, but because, from the video evidence that has been provided, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that this was a PC issue.
    1 point
  7. Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few months of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.
    1 point
  8. Denied. After reviewing your appeal and the staff member's response, alongside the provided evidence, your ban will remain in place. There are serveral reasons for this decision: 1. Clear viotlation of Global Rule 1 The video clip provided clearly shows you using a racial slur (the hard R) repeatedly in voice chat while passing by another player. This is a textbook breach of Global Rule 1, which explicitly prohibits the usage of racial or otherwise offensive slurs. Your defence, that it was not targeted at anyone misses the point entirely. The rule does not require the abuse to be directed at a specific individual. The language that you used is not accepted under any circumstance in our community, full stop. 2. Mischaracterisation of the sit and staff conduct You claim that the staff member failed to provide context or allow you to explain yourself is simply false. Finny clearly outlined what rule was broken and gave you the opportunity to respond and instead of acknowledging the issue or taking any responsibility, you doubled down and tried to dismiss the rule by playing semantics. Saying "I would have apologised if it was directed at someone" only reinforces that you don't understand or are refusing to accept why what you did was unacceptable in the first place. 3. This appeal was not a dispute but an excuse You labeled this appeal as a dispute but failed the challenge the facts. You admitted to saying a racial slur (the hard R) "once or twice" yet the clip shows multiple clear uses of this language. Your entire appeal reads less like a genuine dispute of unfair treatment, and more like an attempt to shift the blame onto the staff member and avoid any accountability. That is not how these appeals are meant to work. 4. Warnings are not owed when it's blatant like this. To be clear here, staff are not required to issue a warning when the offense is as blatant and severe as this one. Running around saying racial slurs does not fall under a "gray area" this was a clear cut violation and you clearly looking for a reaction. Your background as "ex staff" should have made you more aware of this, not less. 5. Accusing staff of trying just to meet "Quotas" Suggesting that Finny issued a ban to "meet a quota" (a quota that does not exist and again something you should know as "ex staff") is not only baseless, but a transparent attempt to discredit a justified punishment. Putting the blame on the staff member rather than reflecting on your own conduct is the exact opposite of what an appeal should contain. Final Note: This is not a case of miscommunication, context being misunderstood, or staff abuse. This is a case of you knowingly breaking the rules and then being upset when held accountable for it. If you are serious about returning to the server and actually roleplaying, I suggest reading the rules and reflecting on your actions.
    1 point
  9. Hello, If you bake a cake with Prometheus in blue icing written on top of the cake you can be unbanned. Or you can grab a pen and write "I am sorry for being a wild animal on Prometheus Networks" 50 times. Thanks.
    1 point
  10. 0 points
  11. So rather then outright giving money, as it's done with the VIP package already to my knowledge, you'd rather that people are given a permanent ability to get and make crap tons of more drugs. Inherently a P2W mechanic. -1
    -1 points
  12. Planted evidence is crazy when I just looked into your inventory. I was the first person who looked in your inventory. Unfair harassment? You're questioning the chief of police inside the lobby of the Interior and I decided to annoy you. Deal with it, it's roleplay. Also you wished death upon me, I don't care if you don't like me but don't crash out and say that I should die. Freak. Blatant lies all over your appeal, stay banned. L Bozo, -1
    -1 points
  13. I do not care for you, nor do I know anything about you. I had just walked by you and saw you harassing the Chief of Police. I am not going to let some random person with no standing in the city talk to the Chief of all Berlin Police. I had asked why you were accusing the Chief and you had, stupidly, decided to ignore me so you were punished so. You do not get to selectively decide what is roleplay and what isn't, if you have an issue or believe that I am "oocly" harassing you then make a ticket. But I 100% guarantee you I have 0 care about you.
    -1 points
  14. https://medal.tv/de/games/garrys-mod/clips/jPvtcenvdMn2NXIsG?invite=cr-MSxzSXgsMTgwMTgyMzk0LA "Hi, I'd like to apologize for the fact that I ltapped, not that I wished death, falsely accused and stated that I would rather take a ban then RP on the RP server" You decided you would take a ban over any Roleplay, I don't see the issue of why you do not wish to serve the ban. Additionally, why should you even get a reduction when you falsely accuse me all over this appeal and refuse to apologize or even believe that you are in the wrong in any other way.
    -1 points
  15. What apart of my interaction with you was relevant? I said I was speaking to you? What does my Roleplay interaction have to do with you deciding to LTARP? I mean this whole paragraph is representative of why you shouldn't be given a reduction, and rather an extension. I also never accused you of saying that you mistakenly LTAP'ed, I don't know where you got that. You also have a one day long ban for LTARP, so yes you have PO's. I highly encourage you take the ban and have a couple weeks off. This will be my last response.
    -1 points
  16. Hi there Warplanet, I had been spectating a situation unfolding at the ICC when I had seen you involved in tying up the NSB-Generaldirektor, no harm in that. But while I was spectating and as you've said you said "Brandt, don't molest anyone" and I was hearing you saying other vile matters. As made abundantly clear by gmod ToS, our Global Rules and basic common sense we don't say those sort of things. So, I brought you into a sit and told you to cut out what you were doing, you seemed combative to me and overall uncouth. So I made the decision to ban you for ERP for 3 days, a light punishment for the things that you said. The punishment I gave to you was lenient, NITRP is defined as No-Intent to Roleplay. I understand that you were trying to "lighten the mood" but you don't say those sort of things when the equal to Heydrich is being arrested inside your base. Please have some common sense, I would not mind having your ban lowered but please keep in mind that you coming back has no relevance to these matters.
    -2 points
  17. Please write a 500 word, hand written apology, stating "I will not fling UA during peak times."
    -2 points
  18. https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/jlqfbwAbOfmPfj6sH?invite=cr-MSxQQkIsMzIzNTk3MTUs
    -2 points
  19. You stated the NSB killed the Interior Minister, then afterwards signed a document proclaiming as such.
    -2 points
  20. Hi. I explained this in Dm's to you about 6 times. You are warned about deleting your character. The fact that you immediately decided to delete your character before anything else is your fault. Next time, do not delete your character. Start anew.
    -2 points
  21. SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!!!!!!
    -2 points
  22. I don't like those kinds of people. -1.
    -2 points
  23. Hi, as I had explained to you in the Armed Forces discord I had PK'ed you based on the merit that you had talked behind my back. You are someone that I personally hired into an Intelligence faction and your actions directly reflect back on me. I hold anyone I personally hire into a faction to a higher metric due to what I am in my IC role. Additionally, it's been made clear to me by my superiors that the attitude of the Armed Forces needs to change. I thought you would make a good example and that is why I had requested a PK on you. I understand that you feel as though that there is "no proof" but you are an Enlisted and I am the Deputy-Chief of the Armed Forces and I had, LITERALLY, as soon as I walked away you two laughing between eachother and talking behind my back. So my argument is based off this: 1. I ensure the discipline of the Armed Forces, 2. I've been directly told to start fixing the Armed Forces acting like morons, 3. I hired you directly into an intelligence faction. My reply will be the same for you friend, I wish you the best of luck on a new character.
    -2 points
  24. I am replying to your appeal because I killed you, not because I am denying the appeal.
    -2 points
  25. can we pretty please have the old map with the marines and ouroboros and get rid of these newgens also can we have mingehour back WE NEEED it man Love Spedu
    -2 points
  26. to be honest i think that it is not fair that you are the one replying and denying my appeal just based off the fact that you are a higher rank than me i feel that is extremely unfair and id like to have a different admin see to my appeal thank you.
    -4 points

Colors Chose your color

Header Backgrounds Chose your background

Index Options Chose index options

2
3
Subforum Columns You can choose how many columns to display your subforums

Overall Options Chose overall options

Header Style Choose between a colored or black/white header
Sidebar Visibility You can hide or unhide your sidebar whenever you want
Back To Top Position You can choose where the back to top button should appear, left or right

×
×
  • Create New...