Leaderboard

Thank you for taking the time to make this appeal. I was not aware that the reverend wanted you to move the car, as you have not stated it to me. All you said was "Oh me and my friend were just fucking around" and "I didn't kill anybody". From my perspective, as I was no-clipped, u had pushed a car with a prop and had hit someone. And when I looked at your notes, there was one from May reading "Prop abuse, take flags next offense". Regarding the issue with my inactivity, I had forgotten to unfreeze you to bring you to a sit. Now I understand that it was non-peak hours with nobody at the base, and you just wanted to have some fun. But you do have to understand that props aren't supposed to be used for those purposes. Therefore, I do support your appeal as I was not aware of Reverend's order. Thanks Misterbaseball99

+1 I asked him to move a vehicle which we were using for formation training. We were doing a state funeral, and the car was being used for us to move around it to simulate funeral transport. It was in the way though so I asked for it to be moved.

This appeal misrepresents both the timeline and rationale behind the PK. First, the punishment received during the earlier trial (demotion, jail time which was never served, and a fine) was acknowledged, but that was not the primary reason the PK was issued. I initially requested a PK after that trial, but it was denied due to lack of final justification. That was fine. What changed was your behavior afterward. Over the following week, you continued to escalate: - You began collecting and logging information on NSB personnel without jurisdiction (we had evidence) - You publicly defied and antagonized the NSB. - You were present at the scene of an NSB agent’s assassination and then escaped our custody during an armed breach. (we had evidence and direct corroboration) Whether you planned the escape or not is irrelevant—what mattered was that you left willingly with armed individuals of which we had concrete evidence were not "2 lapo and 1 kg". That event was the final justification for the PK. It confirmed a pattern of active defiance, circumvention of consequences, and alignment with hostile elements. It wasn’t a random escalation, it was the culmination of everything leading up to that point. Not every detail can or should be disclosed due to its relevance to other players and ongoing roleplay. But the decision was reviewed, justified, and accepted, not based on a single isolated event, but a sustained pattern that I was able to prove. Your character was given multiple opportunities to walk back from the line. He kept sprinting past it. In my opinion, what I had was more than enough for your characters PK.