Leaderboard

You should kill yourself.

Lovely young fella, has plenty of experience on the server and staffing as a whole. i beg you accept this man! +1

Introduction Information Section Steam Name: Shook SteamID32 (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:207879818 Discord Username/ID: shook1416 Timezone: GMT Age: 23 Time Played (check with !time): 1w 2d 23m Your current rank(User/Donator/Trusted): Donator Do you have a mic & will you use it?: Yes Are you consistently active on the forums and server?: Yes Did anyone from the Recruitment Team assist you in making your application?: Kurti Staff Recommendations (Sponsors will be asked to verify): Sharkbait, Kurti, Frosty, Redpug, Chase, Robert Basic Information Section IC Character names, ranks, and brief overview of their duties/everyday activities in a list format: My main character is Hiroshi Zen'in, he is the boss of the Shirohebi Syndicate and runs Zen'in Towers, City Wok & the Red room. I roleplay as a Japanese businessman and help run my many businesses with my 80 ish employee's. How long have you been roleplaying?: I've played on the server we do not speak of for the past 3-4 years and owned multiple factions on there before coming here. Have you received any infractions i.e Notes/Bans? If so, what were they for and what could you have done to prevent getting them next time?: I don't have any bans or notes. Staff Knowledge Section What previous experience so you have as a staff member either within Garry’s Mod or the Nutscript Gamemode? I've been staff for 2+ years on a darkrp server prior and know how to execute all the commands and how the staffing scripts work generally. I was also super admin of a developing server and helped write the rules page, set up NPC's and set up whitelists. Why do you believe we should pick you for the Prometheus Networks Staff Team?[300 words or more]: I believe i would be a useful member to the Prometheus staff team due to my Experience, RP, Commitment and Understanding of the rules and responsibilities. As stated above I have lots of experience in general staffing on different servers and know how to conduct myself in an appropriate manor. I also have experience writing rules, setting up NPC's and whitelists when i was a super admin for a growing server, I believe this experience would help when I'm setting up lockers for people or whitelisting them to certain factions. I have lots of experience in RP, i believe this will help me in knowing how to maintain a good quality of RP as i will know when it is appropriate to pull someone to the sit area without breaking an active RP scenario. This experience in RP will also help me in knowing what is considered failrp or NITRP and will help me enforce the servers rules on the individuals who do not intend on RP'ing appropriately. I am quite committed to this server and intend on being around for a long time, I have acquired a faction along with multiple properties which i have maintained for multiple weeks already, my businesses have websites which we have worked hard on to ensure it adds to the RP experience of interacting with our organisation and businesses. I believe I have a good understanding for the rules and duties my role would require, I have had plenty of experience on staffing as a whole and what appropriate RP and gameplay looks like on this server. In my time on the server I have not received one ban and I believe myself and my businesses are quite well known across the city, i believe this shows that i am capable of RP'ing in a proper manor and am good at interacting well with others which would help me in staffing duties. What are the duties and responsibilities of the position you are applying for in your own words? [150 Words or more]: I believe the duties and responsibilities I will be incurring will pertain as such; Ensuring a level of RP and professionalism is kept throughout the server, handling rulebreakers and people who do not intend to RP properly, Helping the community by answering questions, Handling tickets to whitelist or taking tickets to add lockers, keys or deal with rule breaks. I am aware that if i were to become a staff member i would be representing the server and the staff team and my actions would reflect that. I would ensure to be as helpful as possible and aid the servers growth and RP as best as i can. I believe what I should be looking for is those who do not intend to roleplay/play appropriately, those who simply slip up or accidentally break a rule should be warned but not punished extremely, our duty as a staff member is to maintain and uphold the RP and gameplay quality, not to simply punish everyone who makes a mistake. Notes:

Introduction Information Section Steam Name: Toast SteamID32 (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:1:29580598 Discord Username/ID: .breadtoasted. / 1070338922862878802 Timezone: GMT Age: 28 Time Played (check with !time): 1w 3d 18h 29m Your current rank(User/Donator/Trusted): User Do you have a mic & will you use it?: Yes Are you consistently active on the forums and server?: Very active on the server, I play daily. The forums I check here and there but can be more active if needed. Did anyone from the Recruitment Team assist you in making your application?: No. Staff Recommendations (Sponsors will be asked to verify): Thomas, happy washing machine, Kurti & meem Basic Information Section IC Character names, ranks, and brief overview of their duties/everyday activities in a list format: Tim Brown, Major in the VSK. Basic overview would be leading the VSK when we go out and do stuff like general patrolling, setting up checkpoints & providing security for those who require it. Setting up training sessions within our faction and resolving any internal conflicts. How long have you been roleplaying?: 3+ years. Have you received any infractions i.e Notes/Bans? If so, what were they for and what could you have done to prevent getting them next time?: None that I'm aware of. Staff Knowledge Section What previous experience so you have as a staff member either within Garry’s Mod or the Nutscript Gamemode? I have been staff on Diverge many times so I have a lot of familiarity with Nutscript. I've also staffed on many DarkRP servers in the past. Why do you believe we should pick you for the Prometheus Networks Staff Team?[300 words or more]: I believe I would be a strong addition to the staff team because of my prior staffing experience and consistent activity. As I mentioned prior I was a Seasoned Admin on Diverge in the past, where I regularly handled ban appeals and player reports on the forums side of things, whilst also dealing with tickets made by players in game. Being a staff member requires a person to remain fair, consistent & level headed even when dealing with players who are frustrated or are confrontational players. I know how to investigate situations thoroughly via logs & use of in game commands. I've been playing the server regularly since it switched over to MITHC and have stayed highly active throughout. Because of that, I've gotten a decent understanding of the player base and some of the common issues that arise such as lack of staff members in early hours. I'm applying as someone who is heavily invested into the server and wants to contribute to the community in a more meaningful way. One area where I believe I can make an immediate difference is staffing during the EU hours. Sometimes there’s barely anyone on, or no one at all, and tickets just sit there. I’m usually online during the early and later EU hours, so I could actually help cut down on those wait times and let people get back to playing instead of sitting around waiting for a response. I also try to stay approachable both in-game and out of it. People are more likely to actually message staff when something’s wrong or they need something clarifying if they know the person they're messaging is easy to talk to and won’t just brush them off. Overall I’ve got the previous experience, I’m on enough to actually cover some of the quieter hours, and I care about the server running smoothly and helping out the community. I’d take it seriously if I got the chance. What are the duties and responsibilities of the position you are applying for in your own words? [150 Words or more]: From what I've gathered from past experiences, the main duties are pretty clear. A big part of it is handling player tickets that get made in-game. That means actually looking into the situation, talking to the people involved when needed, checking logs or using the commands and other tools in game that are available to figure out what happened, and then dealing with it in a way that’s fair. Things can range from simple questions to arguments between players, so you have to be ready and not just take one person’s word at face value. Another part of being staff is dealing with ban appeals and PK appeals, especially when you’re the staff member who issued the original punishment. In those cases you’re expected to go back over the situation, read the appeal properly, and give a proper response instead of just ignoring it or automatically sticking by your first decision. At the end of the day, you have to stay consistent and not take things personally, your main goal is to keep the server enjoyable and balanced for all who play. Notes:

+1, good guy, knows a lot about staffing from MafiaRP.

+1

+1 Very active, Seen around a lot during both, quiet hours and peak hours, Has a good understanding of staffing and has previous experience!

+1 known mossad asset

+1 Competent Individual

BIG +1

+1

+1 Plays by the rules, generally a clean dude with a solid reputation.

+1 always putting in work, great RP, I always see him around the city on staff and in RP. I think he would be a great staff member

+1

+1 Prometheus staff doesn't have enough asian staff some diversity is needed

+1 good rp and just a good guy in general

+1 Been around as rong as the emperor

+1 great honor

+1 Fantastic civilian roleplay, has followed the rules throughout a lengthy time on the server, I fully endorse Mr. Zen'in!

+1 Great RP'er and is very well known! Have only had good interactions with this man!! Seems to understand the duties pretty well and would be a solid addition!

+1 Solid rp and well know I would say.

Hi @Donamyslu! After viewing the discussion and reviewing the logs and your long list of notes. I am wondering if there is any sort of evidence on your end that you could provide to help your case, as I am not seeing anything that would make me personally believe to elevate or shorten this ban. Based on your track record, it does not scream to me that you should be unbanned. Of course, you have the chance to provide evidence. Take the time to find clips, or others who witnessed this situation, and have them respond to this thread. Thank you, Have a wonderful day!

Hi @Masterbaitor Thanks for making a PK-Appeal. After reviewing the discussion, it appears you we're pk'd under our guidelines. However, In the manner the pk was done, and in the way the situation played out. I believe this to be an exception on the FearRP rule, without outside context to the situation whatsoever. It appears that the requestor's of the PK, shot you for no reason, and attempted to put your character under fear-RP, and during which, shot you multiple times. The Requestor's side had no control of the men surrounding him, which resulted in you having virtually no option or time to make a choice in the situation. Your character should be unbanned the next time you enter the server, if there is an issue with it, please make a ticket in the discord. Have a wonderful day! Appeal: Approved Thread: Locked

Howdy! Im the one who PKed you, for the last couple of days you've been making downright retarded adverts about gas leaks and you owning illegal materials, at no point in our RP situations did you deny owning these things, nor did you try to argue for yourself at any point until you broke RP about "powergame"! 1. You should probably know its illegal for a CIVILIAN to own nuclear fissile material! 2. You making adverts for the past couple of days TALKING about gas leaks and other "things" happening to the places you own do not help at all! 3. On the NYPD's side, you had a massive thing of meth on your character, :(. If you didn't know, which you do now, the Ouroboros has control over everything nuclear! You probably shouldn't try to make nuclear bombs or whatever you were trying to do in a backyard as a civi! Ill wait for staff to respond, but that's why your dead.

You lost your temper which you admitted, and while under gunpoint you decided to start babbling "YOU'RE SPAWN CAMPING! YOU'RE SPAWN CAMPING!" while swinging punches at the one aiming a gun at you. While there was indiscriminate shooting, you retaliated in the worst way on somebody who was actually trying to roleplay with you. Running away or wailing on your attacker is never a good idea, and shows clear disregard for your life. Another UA member will review your appeal and decide on the outcome.

Denied! I gave you twenty chances to just acknowledge you are an idiot for opening fire while the Mayor is hostage and you just could NOT accept you were totally wrong. You kept trying to have to defend yourself, it was dumb. You were being an idiot. Move on.

I enjoy my time around him, but I don't fully understand what happened that day. ( Natural )

Oh... well I said you can make a ticket in the main discord. You can forget about that DENIED

After looking over the details, you were not given ample time to respond to FearRP. Your appeal is accepted. Appeal: Accepted Thread: Locked

I've never seen anything like it.

Your Name: Arthur Goldstien SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:1:146827208 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): Dispute Which staff member banned you?: SlickB How long is your ban for?: 2 weeks Why were you banned?: MRDM Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: Please look in damage logs. I did not fire a single shot and I was banned for no reason. Just because someone has a similar name doesnt mean I shouldve been banned too. Please make sure you ban the correct person. I've written over 100 pages of documents for the 91st and I was banned for no reason. Additional Information: N/A

You never mentioned this in the staff sit, the claimant said I would like to pk this guy for fearp, then I replied with there was no time given, the claimant then responded with "well you jumped over the fence and we shot you through the fence." you then responded with "I see this pretty clearly." there was no mention about my "behaviour", this is not to go against you and I thank you for agreeing the time was short. But in the sit, I do not remember any mention of this aforementioned behaviour as the PK reason, the PK reason in question was because I "jumped over the fence to escape and was shot through the fence." to my knowledge of what occurred in the sit. And in the clip, it shows that I was pushed from the fence to the outside from the gunshots not that I had manually jumped over the fence on top of the face also that the fence boosts you up. Also would like to mention, again, I had stopped and if they gave me the time to actually execute the mugging it would've completely gone through as it did with the mugging 10 minutes later after this interaction. Thank you still for the support.

can we not tell everyone this please. #notfuckingcool #whatafriendthisguyis

Thank you for taking the time to make a ban appeal. After reviewing the appeal, we would like to discuss the details further in discord. Please make a ticket in our Community Discord to further discuss the situation regarding your ban. Thread: Locked

Description of the idea: A lot of roleplay props were blacklisted during the transition to MITHC. Namely, the large green tents, the heavy washer prop, sandbags, and ammo crates. I'll put their full names below. I don't see a reason for why these props were removed. Why should this be added?: They are used in a significant amount of old dupes, which can still be used now. They also give greater creative choice when making new dupes. What negatives could this have?: None, they're proven props that should be added back. Additional information: Props: models/prometheus/kaiserprops/bunker_sign_liveammo.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_container_ammo_metal_01.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_01.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_44u_a_01.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_44u_a_02.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_box_01.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_box_01_open.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_box_02.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_box_02_open.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_box_sm_01.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_box_sm_02.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_boxstack_02.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_ammo_boxtall_01.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_sfh18_ammo_crate_dirty_01.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/mkt_ger_ammo_shell_sfh18.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/hur_tent_mess.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/hur_tent_mess_closed.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/hur_tent_mess_left.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/hur_tent_mess_right.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/hur_tent_lrg_04.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/hur_tent_lrg_04.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/hur_tent_lrg_02.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/hur_tent_lrg_01.mdl models/props_wasteland/laundry_washer003.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/barrier_sandbag_64.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/barrier_sandbag_64_short.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/barrier_sandbag_end_left.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/barrier_sandbag_end_left_straight.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/barrier_sandbag_end_right.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/barrier_sandbag_end_right_straight.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/barrier_sandbag_group_04.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/barrier_sandbag_single_01.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/barrier_sandbag_single_03.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/hur_crate_medical_supply_01.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/hur_crate_medical_supply_02.mdl models/prometheus/kaiserprops/ger_crate_panzerfaust_box_02.mdl Thanks

Hello, I am the one who PK'd you. I was actually unaware until isaiah told me who you are, and I think you're worth giving a second chance for this kind of thing, given you came from diverge, and usually a lot of rules transfer flat to nutscript servers, and nobody would expect, coming from diverge, that initiating a gunfight against citizens, especially just to incapacitate as an officer will get you PK'd. I actually just thought you were trying to shoot me for no reason here. I feel like you should be let back, but under a different name, so the people doing the murder investigation against me can continue, but you can still get to come back and do as you've done. If staff are cool with this, you deserve a second chance, especially knowing who you are.

Your Name: Hans Arnald SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): i forgot Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): dispute Which staff member banned you?: red pug How long is your ban for?: like a day Why were you banned?: RDM and saying the N word Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: I didn't mean to rdm anyone or vdm. I can explain it all. First of all I was driving with my cruise control on while watching tiktok and accidentally hit a crowd of people. Second the guy i alledgly slammed on the ground, u can't even see me doing in the clip provided. Third of all, i am 42 percent african so i can technically say the nword . I wasnt aware the server rules didnt permit such words. Additional Information: picture of me as a kid

seems like a good young lad +1 please guide this individual to the light at the end of the tunnel

Make a ticket next time you are on the server and ask for UA

Your Name: Donamyslu Your SteamID32: STEAM_0:0:593228317 Staff Members Being Reported: Maverick Kentuckyfriedhorse Staff SteamID32: Maverick: STEAM_0:1:65644683 Kentuckyfriedhorse: STEAM_0:1:93621811 1. Introduction I am submitting this Staff Report to request an investigation into the conduct of Maverick and Kentuckyfriedhorse concerning my original ban and the subsequent handling of my appeal. I want to make something very clear from the beginning: I did not commit the violations being alleged against me. I did not randomly shoot players, I was never shooting people from a rooftop, I did not resist detainment, and I did not LTAP. I also dispute the NITRP, FailRP and RDM allegations used to justify my original punishment. I am not submitting this report merely because I disagree with a punishment or because I am unhappy with an appeal decision. I am submitting it because I believe there are significant inconsistencies between the allegations made against me, the explanations provided by staff, and the published evidence requirements of the server. I understand that staff members have responsibilities and are sometimes required to make decisions based on their own observations. However, those decisions should still be supported by the standards established by Prometheus Networks. I expect those standards to apply consistently, regardless of whether the person being investigated is an ordinary player or a member of the staff team. I will address each staff member and each allegation separately. Timeframe: The relevant incident and subsequent appeal discussion took place throughout this week. The original discussion and the two staff responses were posted at different times. Their exact timestamps are visible in the original forum thread and can be checked directly by Upper Administration. I therefore consider it unnecessary to reproduce individual timestamps here. 2. Maverick – Original Punishment and Allegations The introductory evidence requirements in the official Man in the High Castle Rules state: "Staff cannot act upon an alleged rule break without concrete evidence or having witnessed it themselves." The same section explains that logs may be checked and that witnesses are non-admissible. My original punishment included the following reasons: NITRP FailRP RDM PO (Past Offenses) I categorically dispute the allegations of NITRP, FailRP and RDM in this incident. I did not commit these violations. I would also like the exact past offences relied upon under PO to be identified rather than allowing that label to serve as a general justification for the punishment. When I questioned the original punishment, Maverick provided the following explanation: "If i remember correctly, you were going around shooting people for quite literally no reason, You were resisting detainment and your microphone was absolute ass and caused a lot of spiking despite being asked several times to fix it. I saw you shooting people from a rooftop too i believe. Im not sure if it was you or someone else who LTAP'ed as well but i didnt add it to the reasons." There are several serious issues I would like Upper Administration to investigate. A. Alleged random shooting Maverick claims that I was going around shooting players for absolutely no reason. I categorically deny this allegation. I did not randomly shoot anyone, I did not commit RDM, and I did not go around attacking players without a valid reason. My account of the situation is that I remained at the military base. There was only one other individual present there besides me. I would like the relevant server records examined to establish whether this account is consistent with my recorded location and the actual events. Specifically: Which players was I allegedly shooting? When did these alleged incidents occur? Where did they take place? Is there any damage log showing that I shot or damaged anyone? Is there any kill log identifying me as responsible? What evidence establishes that the alleged shooting was RDM? I am asking for these details because I did not commit the alleged violation, and I want the accusation examined against the actual records rather than accepted simply because it was stated by the original banning staff member. B. Alleged rooftop shooting Maverick specifically stated: "I saw you shooting people from a rooftop too i believe." I want to make this absolutely clear: I WAS NEVER ON A ROOFTOP SHOOTING PEOPLE. I DID NOT COMMIT THIS ALLEGED INCIDENT. I immediately challenged this statement in my original appeal and explicitly requested footage. I have still not received a satisfactory explanation establishing where this alleged incident took place or how Maverick identified me. I find it particularly concerning that an allegation this specific is being presented using the wording "i believe" without any accompanying footage or detailed explanation. I would like Upper Administration to examine my recorded position throughout the relevant timeframe, if such records are available. I would also like the following clarified: Which rooftop was I allegedly on? At what time did this supposedly happen? Which players was I supposedly shooting? Did Maverick personally witness this incident? Was there any recording or other concrete evidence? How was my identity established? I am not asking for special treatment. I am asking for evidence supporting an incident that I maintain never happened. C. Alleged resistance to detainment Maverick also alleges that I was resisting detainment. I dispute this allegation. I WAS NOT BEING DETAINED, AND NOBODY ATTEMPTED TO ARREST ME DURING THE SITUATION I DESCRIBED. I DID NOT RESIST DETAINMENT OR COMMIT THE ALLEGED FAILRP VIOLATION. I have not received a sufficiently detailed explanation of what actions supposedly constituted resistance. I would therefore like clarification regarding: What exact actions am I accused of taking? Which instructions was I allegedly given? How did I supposedly disobey those instructions? When did this occur? What specific evidence supports the allegation? I would like the relevant roleplay records and any available recordings or administrative sit documentation examined. It is not reasonable to expect me to respond meaningfully to an allegation when the actual incident has not been clearly identified. D. Alleged LTAP Maverick explicitly stated: "Im not sure if it was you or someone else who LTAP'ed as well but i didnt add it to the reasons." To be completely clear: I DID NOT LTAP. I DID NOT DISCONNECT TO AVOID CONSEQUENCES, AND I WAS NOT THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ALLEGED INCIDENT. I acknowledge that Maverick stated this was not added as one of the reasons for my original punishment. However, I find it concerning that an allegation involving uncertainty about the identity of the individual responsible was introduced into the discussion surrounding my disciplinary history. If Maverick cannot establish that I was responsible, I do not see why this allegation should have any bearing on the assessment of my appeal. I would like Upper Administration to examine the relevant connection and disconnection records, if retained, and establish whether I was actually responsible. Someone else's potential misconduct should not be attributed to me simply because staff are uncertain about who was involved. E. Alleged NITRP I categorically deny having no intent to roleplay. I did not deliberately avoid roleplay or intentionally disrupt the roleplay situation. I would like Maverick to identify precisely which actions supposedly demonstrated that I had no intent to roleplay and what evidence was used to reach that conclusion. 3. Maverick – Accuracy and Verification of the Original Allegations I believe it is important to distinguish between an allegation being made, an incident being personally witnessed, and an incident being established through reliable evidence. I am not disputing that staff members can act on incidents they personally witness. The published rules explicitly recognise this. However, I am asking whether the allegations in my particular case were accurately identified and whether the original punishment was based on what actually happened. I would like Upper Administration to establish: Which incidents Maverick personally witnessed. Which incidents were established through logs or recordings. Whether the alleged RDM incidents actually involved my character. Whether the alleged rooftop incident was correctly attributed to me. Whether I actually resisted detainment. Whether I was responsible for any LTAP incident, which I categorically deny. Whether the original punishment was based on verified incidents rather than assumptions or mistaken identification. I believe these are entirely reasonable questions when investigating a punishment involving multiple serious allegations. 4. Kentuckyfriedhorse – Handling of My Ban Appeal Kentuckyfriedhorse subsequently reviewed my appeal and provided the following response: "After viewing the discussion and reviewing the logs and your long list of notes. I am wondering if there is any sort of evidence on your end that you could provide to help your case, as I am not seeing anything that would make me personally believe to elevate or shorten this ban. Based on your track record, it does not scream to me that you should be unbanned." My concern is not simply that Kentuckyfriedhorse reached a decision I disagreed with. My concern is that despite claiming to have reviewed the logs, he did not identify which logs supported which allegations or explain how those records established my involvement. Instead, considerable emphasis was placed on my previous track record and his personal assessment of whether I deserved to be unbanned. I understand that previous offences can be relevant when considering disciplinary history. I am not asking for legitimate previous disciplinary records to be ignored. However, having a previous disciplinary history does not prove that I committed the specific violations being alleged in this incident. I disputed the RDM allegations. I denied ever shooting from a rooftop. I denied resisting detainment. I denied LTAP. I also explained that I fixed my microphone when asked. These were specific objections that directly concerned the original punishment. Yet Kentuckyfriedhorse's response did not meaningfully address them. I would like Upper Administration to clarify: Which specific logs did Kentuckyfriedhorse review? What did those logs actually demonstrate? Did he verify my location during the alleged incidents? Did he examine the damage and kill records? Did he independently examine the allegations against me? Why were my specific denials and requests for footage not directly addressed? Was the decision substantially influenced by my previous disciplinary history rather than the evidence concerning this incident? I am not suggesting that Kentuckyfriedhorse was obligated to grant my appeal. I am asking whether the appeal was properly and independently reviewed before the decision was reached. 5. Kentuckyfriedhorse – Request for Witness Statements Another issue I would like investigated is Kentuckyfriedhorse's request for additional evidence. He stated: "Take the time to find clips, or others who witnessed this situation, and have them respond to this thread." The introductory evidence requirements in the Man in the High Castle Rules explicitly state that witnesses are non-admissible. I understand that video recordings and witness statements are two different things. However, I would like clarification regarding why witness statements were specifically requested as supporting material when the published evidence requirements state that witnesses are non-admissible. Were these statements actually intended to be considered evidence in the appeal? If not, what purpose were they intended to serve? I believe staff members should apply the published evidence standards consistently, particularly when handling disciplinary decisions and appeals. I also question why I was being asked to locate people who could support my account when the relevant server-side records should be available for authorised staff to examine, provided those records were retained. 6. Request for Server-Side Evidence Examination I am deliberately not attaching screenshots of individual server logs because I believe the relevant information should be available to authorised staff members through the server's own administrative systems. I am therefore requesting that Upper Administration independently examine the available records associated with the original incident. In particular, I would like the following checked: A. Player location records Examine my recorded position throughout the relevant timeframe, particularly whether I remained at the military base and whether I was ever at the alleged rooftop. I maintain that I was never on a rooftop shooting players. B. Damage records Examine whether I dealt damage to any players during the alleged incidents. I maintain that I did not randomly shoot or attack players. C. Kill records Examine whether I killed anyone during the relevant timeframe, who was allegedly involved, and when these events occurred. I dispute the allegation that I committed RDM. D. Roleplay and detainment records Examine any available records or administrative sit documentation relating to the alleged detainment. I maintain that I did not resist detainment or commit the alleged FailRP violation. E. Connection and disconnection records Examine the relevant connection and disconnection records, if retained. I maintain that I did not LTAP or leave to avoid consequences. F. Original administrative records Examine the original ban documentation, administrative sit records, and any recordings or evidence available to Maverick when issuing the punishment. G. Appeal review records Examine what records Kentuckyfriedhorse actually reviewed and whether the allegations were independently verified before the appeal decision was reached. I specifically request that any relevant records still available be preserved and examined before a final determination is made. I believe this would provide a considerably more objective understanding of what happened than relying exclusively on recollections or assumptions. 7. Request for an Independent Investigation Under General Rule 35 of the Man in the High Castle Rules, disputes regarding staff decisions may be brought to a higher-ranking staff member or through a forum Staff Report. I am therefore formally requesting that this matter be reviewed by someone who was not directly involved in the original punishment or appeal decision. Specifically, I would like Upper Administration to investigate: Whether Maverick had sufficient evidence or firsthand observations to justify the original RDM allegation, which I deny committing. Whether the rooftop shooting allegation was accurately attributed to me, which I categorically deny ever doing. Whether I actually resisted detainment, which I deny. Whether I was responsible for an LTAP incident, which I deny. Whether the NITRP and FailRP allegations were supported by concrete evidence, which I deny. What specific logs Maverick relied upon when issuing the punishment. Which specific logs Kentuckyfriedhorse reviewed when assessing my appeal. Whether Kentuckyfriedhorse independently examined the allegations rather than relying primarily on Maverick's recollection. Why witness statements were requested despite the published non-admissibility requirement. Whether my previous disciplinary history influenced the appeal decision more than the evidence relating to this particular incident. Whether the published evidence requirements were followed throughout the original punishment and subsequent appeal. I believe these questions deserve clear and direct answers. 8. Evidence and Relevant Links 1. Original Ban Appeal https://prn.gg/topic/2620-ban-appeal/ This is the central source of information for this report. It contains: My original ban appeal and the stated reasons for punishment. Maverick's allegations. My denial of the alleged random shooting. My explicit denial of ever shooting people from a rooftop. My request for footage. My denial of resisting detainment. Maverick's admission of uncertainty regarding LTAP. Kentuckyfriedhorse's response claiming to have reviewed the logs. Kentuckyfriedhorse's request for clips or witnesses. My subsequent objections and requests for clarification. 9. Additional Information I want to emphasise that I am not demanding that either staff member be dismissed simply because I disagree with their decisions. I am requesting an impartial investigation into their conduct and the procedures followed during my punishment and appeal. I categorically deny the allegations discussed throughout this report. I did not randomly shoot players. I was never shooting people from a rooftop. I did not resist detainment. I did not LTAP. I dispute the NITRP, FailRP and RDM accusations made against me. I acknowledge that my microphone experienced technical issues, but I addressed them when requested. I am asking that these denials be examined against the actual server records rather than dismissed because of my previous disciplinary history. I also want to make clear that I understand staff members have discretion. However, that discretion should be exercised consistently with the published rules and evidence requirements. I expect ordinary players to be held accountable for their actions, and I believe staff members should be held to the same standards of accountability when issuing punishments and reviewing appeals. I would appreciate a direct response to the concerns outlined above, an independent examination of the available records, and a determination of whether any procedural shortcomings or staff misconduct occurred. I am submitting this report in good faith and expect it to be reviewed impartially, without being dismissed simply because I am the individual who originally received the punishment. Thank you for taking the time to review my report.

+1 I completely agree with this report. Staff members should be held accountable to the same standards they enforce on the player base. Punishments should be supported by concrete evidence, and appeals should be reviewed objectively rather than based primarily on someone's disciplinary history or personal opinion. The inconsistencies outlined here deserve to be investigated by Upper Administration.

Description of the idea: I would like to suggest implementing a permanent duty kit for law enforcement personnel that is provided upon spawning while on duty. The contents of the kit would depend on the officer’s rank and department. At a minimum, I believe every officer should receive a baton and a pistol. I would also like to request that actual handcuffs be added to the game if the current restraints are only placeholders. If a permanent duty kit is not possible, I suggest reducing the prices of purchasable weapons and equipment to make them more affordable, especially for cadets and newer officers. Why should this be added? As a cadet who is still relatively new to the city, I have experienced multiple gunfights in a single night and have died numerous times. Each time I die, I lose the guns and batons I had equipped, forcing me to spend more money just to be properly equipped. Newer officers do not earn large amounts of money, making it difficult to afford the equipment needed to perform their duties effectively. I originally joined the police department with approximately 700 DM, and I have been steadily losing money trying to maintain the equipment necessary to defend myself and perform my job. A permanent duty kit would allow officers to focus on roleplay and law enforcement rather than constantly worrying about the cost of replacing essential equipment. It would also help newer officers remain equipped without placing them at a financial disadvantage compared to more experienced officers. What negatives could this have? Providing permanent weapons and equipment could potentially reduce the importance of the in-game economy and make it easier for officers to access equipment without financial consequences. It could also create balance concerns if every rank and department receives the same equipment regardless of its responsibilities. However, these concerns could be addressed by making the kits department-specific and rank-based, while limiting their use to on-duty personnel. Additional information: I would also like to address the current cost of certain equipment. For example, a single-use evidence bag costing 200 DM seems excessively expensive, particularly for newer officers who are already struggling to afford weapons and other necessities. Another concern is that suspects sometimes continue to draw weapons and kill officers even when they are already being held at gunpoint by multiple officers. This can make encounters unnecessarily difficult and often leaves officers feeling that they need four or more people surrounding a suspect just to have a reasonable chance of restraining them. I believe improvements to restraint mechanics, including the addition of proper handcuffs, could help address this issue and create more balanced law enforcement interactions. I understand that this may sound like a complaint about money, but my intention is to suggest changes that would improve the experience for newer officers and make law enforcement more enjoyable and practical for everyone. Thank you for taking the time to consider my suggestion.

Your Name: idfk but my steam name is France greatest soldier SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:739397257 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): apology? Which staff member banned you?: Whoreson How long is your ban for?: Perma Why were you banned?: Being a faggot Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: because everyone is a faggot and if everyone is a faggot no one is Additional Information: i don't even remember what i did so i got no clue what it even is i am appealing. im not a faggot though

Appeal accepted. Your character will be unpk'd.

Character's name & rank: Senior Detective Willhelm Pastern SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:574946909 Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): I don't know Explain why you were PK'd: The NYPD Shot me and Mark Cambell and I was PKed for shooting back Why should you be un-PK'd?: Because they were minging and telling me to pull over when wearing my ABI uniform Mark was with me and we were telling them off they kept following us and we tried to get away but they boxed us and gunned us down without a reason but I shouldn't have shot back but they were minging the whole time anyways Additional Information:

Character's name & rank: Operative Paul Müller SteamID : https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198176596851/ Staff member who issued the PK (if you know): No clue Explain why you were PK'd: Because I accidentally shot the mayor while trying to resolve a hostage situation Why should you be un-PK'd?: Because, I believe it wasn't my fault after so long time I finally got promoted to Operator and put in charge of a Unit, I have already resolved a hostage situation and I believe that the mayor ran towards the guy I was shooting instead of trying to get away. Additional Information: https://youtu.be/C_KI6Awdsks Video of the situtation from my point of view

Denied.

You cannot rescind a staff report over wanting to do business IC, if the staff member broke rules then that's a separate thing pic unrelated