Coffee

Denied. Your apology lacks sincerity and accountability. Calling the situation "a little but dumb" and saying that you were "just fucking around" minimises the seriousness of your actions. You deflect blame by saying "the guy said it wasn't RDM" and offer excuses like "I was still stuck in minge hour" rather than taking clear responsibility. You also have multiple very recent offenses for RDM but you try and shrug it off by saying "some of my notes are invalid quite literally" which again shows that this apology is not sincere, so this 3 day ban was more than fair in fact, it was generous. Repeated rule breaking, especially of the same type, shows a clear pattern that you're not here to actually roleplay. A better approach for this appeal would've been something like: "I take full responsbility for my actions. I understand that it was wrong, and I apologise to the players and staff involved. I'll do my best to improve and follow the rules moving forward." I'd also recommend that you read the rules before you return.

You were banned for NITRP, and the decision was made after a clear pattern of behavior, not a single isolated incident. You claim there was "no actual reason for the ban" but let's take a closer look at what happened. First, you had chosen the RP name (John Jacwavious Hickle Bottom the 13th) this was clearly not appropriate for a serious RP setting. Then you were given a name change prompt during our sit and you changed it to Ben Bobbington, which again didn't reflect serious intent to roleplay. Eventually, I had to change it to Ben Kruger, a more acceptable name. But even then. you persisted in asking, multiple times, what was wrong with your orginal name, not out of genuine confusion, but with obvious intent to provoke a reaction. As I told you directly at the start of our conversation "If you don't see the issue with the name John Jacwavious Hickle Bottom the 13th and if you're going to sit there and blatantly troll by pretending like you don't know what is wrong with that name, I think you deserve a break so you can think about what is wrong with that name" Your response was to continue arguing the point, acting like you had no idea what the issue was, and escalating the situation by using phrases like "I ain't trolling cuh" in OOC chat, which clearly isn't the behavior of someone attempting to seriously roleplay or resolve a genuine concern. This isn't just about a name, it's about a pattern of behavior. Your past record also shows similar trolling behavior that disrupts the RP experience for other players. You were given multiple chances to engage maturely and move on, but instead you doubled down and kept pretending to be confused, clearly not taking the situation seriously. This ban wasn't issued hasitly. It was a direct response to continued trolling, refusal to ackknowledge that you were in the wrong and an ongoing lack of effort to take part in roleplay that respects the server and it's rules. And finally let me be clear, if this appeal had been an apology where you took accountability for your blatant trolling, I would have accepted this appeal straight away. But instead you've attempted to rewrite the situation as though you were unfairly targeted, which only reinforces the concern that you're not here to engage seriously within the community. This appeal is denied, the decision stands.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.

Accepted.

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Denied Reapply in 30 days.

Accepted.

Denied. While the apology is appreciated, the ban was more that justified, and what you did was done with malicious intent and was not "some sort of mistake". A three day ban for this situation is incredibly generous, so I think it's fair that you serve out the rest of the time on this ban.

Format this appeal correctly and also provide more context to the situation or this will be denied.

Denied. You opened fire during a massive public event with 110 + people all in the same small area. Whether you meant to hit just NSB or not, you were the only one who started shooting, which is why it's being treated as MRDM. On top of that, you immediately disconnected after which is LTARP, regardless of intent. This isn't just a "should've been a PK moment". You escalated to gun fire in the worst possible way in one of the most packed scenes in the servers entire history and disrupted RP for a ton of people. The ban will remain as it was 100% justified.

Accepted. After reviewing your appeal and the situation in full, I've decided to reduce the length of your ban. However, I want to make it clear that this decision isn't based on your behavior improving, in fact, quite the opposite. Your past actions, combined with your conduct in this specific situation, show a consistent disregard for the rules and clear lack of intent to engage in serious roleplay. Much of your behavior can only be described as minging and disruptive. That said, while the ban itself was justified I do think that a one week ban may have been slightly excessive for this particular incident so this ban will be shortened to one day.

Accepted. After reviewing everything, your appeal is accepted but not because you "did nothing wrong" but because you've shown some willingness to take responsibility and apologise. That said, your initial attempt to deflect the blame did not help your case. You were just unbanned days ago and immediately ended up banned again. Consider this your final warning, if you get banned again in the next few weeks, I will personally ensure it's extended to several weeks. Do not take this acceptance as leniency you can walk all over. Learn from this, follow the rules and treat other players and staff with respect.

Denied. After reviewing your appeal and considering the context of your actions now and also your past actions, the ban will remain in place. As outlined, this decision was based on a consistent pattern of rule breaking, poor attitude during a staff sit and a clear disregard for the server's roleplay standards. I encourage you to read the server rules and reflect on this situation during the remaining time on your ban.

Accepted.

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Denied Reapply in 30 days.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions for a situation like this again, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.

Denied.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.

Accepted. From the clip provided I believe that the people involved were way too quick to shoot Bob Pikeman and I agree with Bob Pikeman's statement of "Your orders were not clearly given (just spamming a bind in chat is not clear)". This is espcially true when he is surrounded by 4 people yelling at him. I also do think that an arrest could have easily been made in this situation as the car was being bodyblocked and he was surrounded under gunpoint too. Also from this clip Bob Pikeman was put at gunpoint at 00:53 and then killed at 00:58 and the rules clearly state "You must have a valid RP reason to kill someone. You may shoot someone if they damage you with a weapon/vehicle. You may not shoot someone because of their physical appearance, faction or simply because they insulted you. You must give someone a verbal or text warning and allow them 10 seconds to respond before escalating the roleplay. Following this warning, you may kill them if they pull out a weapon. Do not bait someone to shoot/RDM you, and do not punch minge or initiate arguments to harass someone."

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!