Coffee

Denied. Your ban is justified. You left the server during an active roleplay situation while being demoted, then rejoined only 50 seconds later. This is a clear case of LTARP. Additionally, you have a recent prior LTARP offence just 8 days ago which is why the length of the ban was increased. Your explanation does not change the fact that you intentionally left the server to avoid roleplay consequences, and you could have handled this situation better by simply just communicating to staff, or those around you, that you were having "issues" with your internet connection, instead of just leaving the server. This ban will remain in place.

Denied. Your PK was justified under the Dirt PK guidelines. You made direct threats to the KG while in custody, including stating that you would make a witness statement against them. As per the rules, "Dirt" is any information that can lead to arrest of execution, and openly threatening this to the people detaining you is valid grounds for a PK. This appeal is therefore denied.

Denied. This appeal is being denied for the following reasons: 1. You have listed this as an apology appeal, yet the majority of your responses are disputing the ban rather than taking accountability. 2. You have not clearly explained your side of the situation, even after being asked multiple times to clarify. Your statements remain difficult to follow, making it hard for your case to be properly reviewed. 3. The appeal lacks the detail, structure, and sincerity we expect when reviewing apology appeals. If you wish to appeal another ban in the future, please ensure that: You choose the correct appeal type (Apology or Dispute). You provide a clear and coherent explanation of events. This ban will remain in place.

Accepted. I'll be accepting this on the condition that you were not aware that this was against the rules. For future reference, this is the rule that prohibits the action that you took: General Rule 5: You cannot roleplay as a psychopath, hitman, serial killer or any role that strictly involves killing other players. Any killing(s) done as a result of this kind of roleplay will be considered RDM.

Denied. Following a review of this appeal, your two week ban has now been escalated to a permanent ban, effective immediately. Reason for Escalation: 1. Inappropriate And Disgusting Comment A clip clearly shows you making an extremely inappropriate and disturbing comment involving an 11 year old "having a monster penis". This type of behavior is not only vile but completely inappropriate and completely unacceptable in any community, especially ours. 2. Minging And Disruptive Behavior In The Sit During your sit, your conduct was not cooperative or sincere. You displayed a blatant disregard for the seriousness of the situation by acting immaturely, refusing to take the situation seriously, and generally minging throughout. 3. Reaching Out To The Banning Staff Member On Discord And Being Inappropriate After the ban was issued, you messaged Freddy on Discord asking to be unbanned and followed up with Inappropriate messages such as "Wanna play FAP nights at Freddy's?" This is an immature and creepy remark that reinforces your lack of respect for yourself, staff members and the community standards that we have. Given the nature and pattern of your actions, I do not believe you are fit for this community, as your behavior is disgusting and shows your lack of maturity. You may not submit an appeal no earlier than three months from the date of this ban. Any appeal you submit must include a detailed and sincere apology, in which you take full accountability for your actions. You will be expected to clearly reflect on why your behavior was wrong and unacceptable, why it was disgusting, how you have changed since then, and include a genuine commitment that this kind of behavior will never happen again.

Denied. After a review of this appeal, the evidence provided, and your responses, this appeal is denied for the following reasons: 1. You Cannot Mug or Kidnap General Ranking Officers This is clearly outlined in the server rules: General Rule 26: You can not mug or kidnap General Ranking Officers as these individuals command fear, respect, and would realistically have guards. The person you mugged was the Minister of Labour and he is classed as a "General Ranking Officer". I do appreciate that you acknowledged this rule break in your appeal, taking responsibility for that part was a good first step. However, the rest of the appeal fails to show the same level of accountability. 2. Pretending To Be AFK is FailRP In the clip you provided, you sat down during an active arrest and failed to respond whilst you were clearly there, which is pretending to be AFK and while sitting, you cannot be tied up due to game mechanics which is why you did this to avoid getting arrested and this is just FailRP. The arresting officers then shot you so you would respawn, which would reset you and allow for the RP to continue with you standing, and able to be tied. This was a logical and justified response by them. 3. You Disconnected Immediately After Respawning (LTARP) Server logs clearly show that you disconnected by user about 5 seconds after being killed, not a timeout, not a crash. if your game had truly "crashed" the logs would indicate a connection timeout or error. This is a textbook example of leaving to avoid roleplay (LTARP), especially considering that it happened while you were actively being arrested. 4. Going To Your Spawn Point Is Not Metgaming It's completely normal during conflict scenarios (like a civil war or an arrest) for players to continue pursuing you after shooting you, including going to known spawn points. This is not metagaming, and it happens regularly during civil wars or even basic arrests. There's no rule violation here. 5. Deflecting Blame Doesn't Strengthen Your Case You continously pointed out other's behavior, accusing them of using OOC terms or metagaming, but this appeal is about your conduct, not theirs. Deflecting attention from your own rulebreaks instead of taking ownership, is not going to help you get your appeal accepted. 6. Missed Opportunity for Accountability This appeal could have been accepted if you had simply taken full accountability, apologised sincerely, and stopped trying to dispute each detail. But instead, you've attempted to challenge nearly every aspect of a situation that is well documented by the server logs and supported by your own clips that show that you're clearly in the wrong here. I'd recommend using the remaining time on your ban to review the rules carefully and reflect on your approach to roleplay.

Denied. You were given multiple chances to stop moving while you were under gunpoint, and you refused. As a result, you were shot. Then instead of the Lapo immediately requesting a PK on you for breaking fear RP and dying, they tried to roleplay out the arrest. However you continued to break Fear RP and die multiple times before this was rightfully escalated to a PK. Additionally, you have deleted your character, which makes the character unable to be restored.

Denied. Thank you for the apology, but we don't believe you're someone who should be part of our community. The nature of your past actions and beliefs goes beyond what we're willing to overlook, regardless of any claimed change. The ban will remain in place, and you will be unable to appeal it.

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Accepted. Make a ticket in game requesting for a member of UA to unblacklist your flags when you're next on the server.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately.

Denied. Your PK has been reviewed and is going to be upheld based on the clear justification for the PK. As an enlisted soldier brought into the intelligence department within the armed forces directly by the Deputy Chief of the Armed Forces (Kuno Darres), you were expected to uphold a high standard. However you did the complete opposite, and you started speaking dismissively and disrespectfully about the very person who gave you the privilege to be put into the intelligence department. Given his role and the trust he placed in you, this was seen as a serious breach of military decorum, something that the High command of the Armed Forces are working to reform, you being shot served as a necessary example to reinforce the orders and standards from Military high command. Also since you made the point of " I feel like i should have been removed from my unit if i was being incompetent instead of being permanently killed." It states in the PK guidelines that last resort only applies when PKing players of importance (i.e. Last resort is not required for PKing a Grenadier). This means that this PK did not require for all other options to be looked at beforehand. As such, all procedures were followed appropriately in this case.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately.

Accepted. This is not being accepted because you are disputing it, or the banning staff member did something wrong, but because, from the video evidence that has been provided, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that this was a PC issue.

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Denied. Your appeal is denied at this time. It lacks genuine accountability for your previous actions and focuses more on denial and deflection rather than reflection or ownership. You can make a new appeal in two weeks and I expect a sincere acknowledgment of your past behavior, an understanding of why it was unacceptable, and a clear explanation of how you've changed since then.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few months of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.

Denied. After reviewing your appeal and the staff member's response, alongside the provided evidence, your ban will remain in place. There are serveral reasons for this decision: 1. Clear viotlation of Global Rule 1 The video clip provided clearly shows you using a racial slur (the hard R) repeatedly in voice chat while passing by another player. This is a textbook breach of Global Rule 1, which explicitly prohibits the usage of racial or otherwise offensive slurs. Your defence, that it was not targeted at anyone misses the point entirely. The rule does not require the abuse to be directed at a specific individual. The language that you used is not accepted under any circumstance in our community, full stop. 2. Mischaracterisation of the sit and staff conduct You claim that the staff member failed to provide context or allow you to explain yourself is simply false. Finny clearly outlined what rule was broken and gave you the opportunity to respond and instead of acknowledging the issue or taking any responsibility, you doubled down and tried to dismiss the rule by playing semantics. Saying "I would have apologised if it was directed at someone" only reinforces that you don't understand or are refusing to accept why what you did was unacceptable in the first place. 3. This appeal was not a dispute but an excuse You labeled this appeal as a dispute but failed the challenge the facts. You admitted to saying a racial slur (the hard R) "once or twice" yet the clip shows multiple clear uses of this language. Your entire appeal reads less like a genuine dispute of unfair treatment, and more like an attempt to shift the blame onto the staff member and avoid any accountability. That is not how these appeals are meant to work. 4. Warnings are not owed when it's blatant like this. To be clear here, staff are not required to issue a warning when the offense is as blatant and severe as this one. Running around saying racial slurs does not fall under a "gray area" this was a clear cut violation and you clearly looking for a reaction. Your background as "ex staff" should have made you more aware of this, not less. 5. Accusing staff of trying just to meet "Quotas" Suggesting that Finny issued a ban to "meet a quota" (a quota that does not exist and again something you should know as "ex staff") is not only baseless, but a transparent attempt to discredit a justified punishment. Putting the blame on the staff member rather than reflecting on your own conduct is the exact opposite of what an appeal should contain. Final Note: This is not a case of miscommunication, context being misunderstood, or staff abuse. This is a case of you knowingly breaking the rules and then being upset when held accountable for it. If you are serious about returning to the server and actually roleplaying, I suggest reading the rules and reflecting on your actions.

Denied. Your apology lacks sincerity and accountability. Calling the situation "a little but dumb" and saying that you were "just fucking around" minimises the seriousness of your actions. You deflect blame by saying "the guy said it wasn't RDM" and offer excuses like "I was still stuck in minge hour" rather than taking clear responsibility. You also have multiple very recent offenses for RDM but you try and shrug it off by saying "some of my notes are invalid quite literally" which again shows that this apology is not sincere, so this 3 day ban was more than fair in fact, it was generous. Repeated rule breaking, especially of the same type, shows a clear pattern that you're not here to actually roleplay. A better approach for this appeal would've been something like: "I take full responsbility for my actions. I understand that it was wrong, and I apologise to the players and staff involved. I'll do my best to improve and follow the rules moving forward." I'd also recommend that you read the rules before you return.

You were banned for NITRP, and the decision was made after a clear pattern of behavior, not a single isolated incident. You claim there was "no actual reason for the ban" but let's take a closer look at what happened. First, you had chosen the RP name (John Jacwavious Hickle Bottom the 13th) this was clearly not appropriate for a serious RP setting. Then you were given a name change prompt during our sit and you changed it to Ben Bobbington, which again didn't reflect serious intent to roleplay. Eventually, I had to change it to Ben Kruger, a more acceptable name. But even then. you persisted in asking, multiple times, what was wrong with your orginal name, not out of genuine confusion, but with obvious intent to provoke a reaction. As I told you directly at the start of our conversation "If you don't see the issue with the name John Jacwavious Hickle Bottom the 13th and if you're going to sit there and blatantly troll by pretending like you don't know what is wrong with that name, I think you deserve a break so you can think about what is wrong with that name" Your response was to continue arguing the point, acting like you had no idea what the issue was, and escalating the situation by using phrases like "I ain't trolling cuh" in OOC chat, which clearly isn't the behavior of someone attempting to seriously roleplay or resolve a genuine concern. This isn't just about a name, it's about a pattern of behavior. Your past record also shows similar trolling behavior that disrupts the RP experience for other players. You were given multiple chances to engage maturely and move on, but instead you doubled down and kept pretending to be confused, clearly not taking the situation seriously. This ban wasn't issued hasitly. It was a direct response to continued trolling, refusal to ackknowledge that you were in the wrong and an ongoing lack of effort to take part in roleplay that respects the server and it's rules. And finally let me be clear, if this appeal had been an apology where you took accountability for your blatant trolling, I would have accepted this appeal straight away. But instead you've attempted to rewrite the situation as though you were unfairly targeted, which only reinforces the concern that you're not here to engage seriously within the community. This appeal is denied, the decision stands.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.