Coffee

Denied. You opened fire during a massive public event with 110 + people all in the same small area. Whether you meant to hit just NSB or not, you were the only one who started shooting, which is why it's being treated as MRDM. On top of that, you immediately disconnected after which is LTARP, regardless of intent. This isn't just a "should've been a PK moment". You escalated to gun fire in the worst possible way in one of the most packed scenes in the servers entire history and disrupted RP for a ton of people. The ban will remain as it was 100% justified.

Accepted. After reviewing your appeal and the situation in full, I've decided to reduce the length of your ban. However, I want to make it clear that this decision isn't based on your behavior improving, in fact, quite the opposite. Your past actions, combined with your conduct in this specific situation, show a consistent disregard for the rules and clear lack of intent to engage in serious roleplay. Much of your behavior can only be described as minging and disruptive. That said, while the ban itself was justified I do think that a one week ban may have been slightly excessive for this particular incident so this ban will be shortened to one day.

Accepted. After reviewing everything, your appeal is accepted but not because you "did nothing wrong" but because you've shown some willingness to take responsibility and apologise. That said, your initial attempt to deflect the blame did not help your case. You were just unbanned days ago and immediately ended up banned again. Consider this your final warning, if you get banned again in the next few weeks, I will personally ensure it's extended to several weeks. Do not take this acceptance as leniency you can walk all over. Learn from this, follow the rules and treat other players and staff with respect.

Denied. After reviewing your appeal and considering the context of your actions now and also your past actions, the ban will remain in place. As outlined, this decision was based on a consistent pattern of rule breaking, poor attitude during a staff sit and a clear disregard for the server's roleplay standards. I encourage you to read the server rules and reflect on this situation during the remaining time on your ban.

Accepted.

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Denied Reapply in 30 days.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions for a situation like this again, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.

Denied.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.

Accepted. However, If you receive any infractions within the first few weeks of your unban, the permanent ban will be reinstated immediately, without any chance to appeal it.

Accepted. From the clip provided I believe that the people involved were way too quick to shoot Bob Pikeman and I agree with Bob Pikeman's statement of "Your orders were not clearly given (just spamming a bind in chat is not clear)". This is espcially true when he is surrounded by 4 people yelling at him. I also do think that an arrest could have easily been made in this situation as the car was being bodyblocked and he was surrounded under gunpoint too. Also from this clip Bob Pikeman was put at gunpoint at 00:53 and then killed at 00:58 and the rules clearly state "You must have a valid RP reason to kill someone. You may shoot someone if they damage you with a weapon/vehicle. You may not shoot someone because of their physical appearance, faction or simply because they insulted you. You must give someone a verbal or text warning and allow them 10 seconds to respond before escalating the roleplay. Following this warning, you may kill them if they pull out a weapon. Do not bait someone to shoot/RDM you, and do not punch minge or initiate arguments to harass someone."

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Denied. This ban was justified considering your actions and recent POs. I'd recommend reading the rules during the remaining time on your ban.

Denied. You hit the Interior Minister (member of national high command) in the face with your gun as a low ranking CO and then faced the consequences of your actions.

Thank you for writing an apology. That's a good start, but honestly, it feels like you're downplaying your actions and not fully taking accountability. Saying things like "Only killed 2 people" and defending your reasoning makes it come off like a half apology, half justification. Just because someone from your faction is being detained does not mean you can sit on a roof and gun everyone down. You're expected to engage, roleplay, and assess the situation, not shoot first and ask questions later. Shooting into a crowd, killing people, including your faction member whom you were trying to "rescue" without any interaction, is MRDM. Also, when I pulled you to a sit to discuss the situation, I was not planning on banning you. I was going to educate you on the rules. But when I asked you why you did it, you didn't really give me an answer, and then said something along the lines of "because it was based". This came off as you just blatantly trolling, which escalated the situation to a ban. If you had just explained your side of the story calmly, it would have been a verbal warning or a note at most. I'll let another member of UA decide the verdict of your appeal.

Denied. To begin with, you detained the NSB chief on two separate occasions without any real legitimate cause, you also started dragging him around, and then stole items from him. These actions alone were highly illegal, and you were way out of your depth here as a HAUPTMANN of the Feldjagers to detain the NSB chief with little justification. Following that, you proceeded to order the detainment of the entire NSB for "breaking in" whilst they were serving a PCO, when they were let inside the ICC by a member of the military. The series of actions you took fully justifies the PK, considering the full context of the situation.

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Accepted Welcome to the Staff Team!

Denied. You hit a member of the Kaisergarde with your car, they tried to arrest you, surrounded you and held you under gunpoint, therefore, meaning you're under Fear RP, and then you decided to get in your car and drive off. Therefore, you fell under the PK guideline: "Being killed while not abding by Fear RP".

Denied. As Lentz explained, you we're PKd because you ran into a hostage situation and shot one of the hostage takers, then his friend ran in and shot you afterwards. This is clear grounds for a PK, i'm not sure what else you expected.

Denied. Your appeal has been denied at this time. You may submit a new appeal in one month. When doing so, ensure that you put more genuine effort into your appeal. I also strongly recommend that you change both your username and profile picture to reflect a more appropriate presence.

Denied. After reviewing the full context of this appeal, including your responses, the original request, and the relevant IC events, I'm denying this appeal. The PK was valid, justified, and executed with sufficient cause based on your character's conduct. Let's be absolutely clear, this PK was not issued solely because of the trial or PCO denials. That situation was handled with a demotion, a fine and time in jail. But facing consequences in court does not grant you immunity from further IC retaliation, especially when your actions after that trial continued to escalate against the NSB. The NSB, more than any other faction will persue further action against you, legal or illegal. If your behavior towards the NSB then continues to pose a threat after the trial. Then you are certainly not protected by that trial, you were warned by it. If anything, the court outcome placed your character under increased scrutiny. What followed was repeated defiance, intelligence gathering on the NSB, obstruction and ultimately fleeing NSB custody during a military led breach this fully justified an IC response from the NSB beyond any legal proceedings. At that point it becomes entirely reasonable for the NSB to want to murder your character. You don't get to provoke the NSB repeatedly, get broken out of their custody by armed members of the military and then argue you should still be safe because you complied "eventually". Your decision to leave with them, regardless of intent is what made this PK justifiable along with your other actions. On top of that, there was an active case file detailing your conduct, including your internal statements referring to the NSB as kidnappers and criminals. That's not going to be taken lightly that's seen as a declarion of hositilty against the NSB, and it further supports the justification that your character had entered open opposition against the NSB.

Denied. The server logs confirm that you were present on the server at the time of the incident. Additionally, there is a clip that clearly shows you breaking fear RP when the military were trying to arrest you, which directly led to your death.