Coffee

Denied. I will also be extending this ban to two weeks since it seems you didn't learn your lesson not to break the server rules. You made a ban appeal for the same exact situation yesterday, and it already got denied, and you were not given permission to make another appeal by UA. You have also been banned three times within a five day period from 25-04-2024 to 30-04-2024, which at this point has to be some sort of record.

Denied. You knew exactly what you were doing and that it was wrong. That is why you swapped characters instantly after you pressed the pantheon buttons. It was not because "it was boring in that building". If you were to take accountability and own up instead of saying "I didn't know you could press the buttons" I would have accepted your ban appeal. A 1 day ban is a fair punishment, and this should teach you not to press the pantheon buttons again.

Hello I was the staff member who issued the PK. You was PK'd under the PK guideline: On the orders of Feldmarschall, Innenminister, Vizekanzler, Konsul, Kanzler, Prinzregent, Kaiser [PK] You "passing" the bar exam would be irrelevant in this case and does not save you from this situation as you was not PK'd due the fact you was put in uniform early it was your actions after you was put in uniform early which lead to your death. This is true and I also saw these tickets myself as you made multiple of them. In my eyes this PK is fair and justified. Another member of Upper Administration will decide the outcome of your PK appeal shortly.

Accepted. This will be your last chance. Any more major rule breaks will result in you being permanently banned, and your next ban appeal will be instantly denied.

Denied. This PK was fair and justified. You made a mistake, were given a chance to correct the mistake by a member of staff, and decided not to. This PK is the punishment for your rule break / mistake, and this was completely in your own hands this was your decision. The best thing you can do is learn from this situation so you do not make the same mistakes in the future.

Accepted. Hello, I was the staff member who issued the ban. The reasoning for your ban was because you were blatantly Ruining a Roleplay Scenario by Micspamming and Screaming into Your Microphone I do think that 3 months was harsh initially, so I have decided to lower your ban to 3 days. Please keep in mind for next time that this is a roleplay server, and screaming into your microphone and micspamming is not roleplay. and you are at risk of being punished for that. I'd also recommend reading the server rules to get a better understanding of how the server works.

Accepted. Please be more careful in the future in regards to situations like this. You will remain banned from the Discord servers for one more week.

Denied. You can make a new ban appeal in 1 month.

Accepted.

Denied. "accidentally pressed the wrong key and ended up killing about 2 or 3 people."

Accepted. Thank you for being honest and taking accountability for your own actions. Please keep these rules in mind for when you are next on the server: General Rule: 2. You must have a valid RP reason to kill someone. You may shoot someone if they damage you with a weapon/vehicle. You may not shoot someone because of their physical appearance, faction or simply because they insulted you. You must give someone a verbal or text warning and allow them 10 seconds to respond before escalating the roleplay. Following this warning, you may kill them if they pull out a weapon. Do not bait someone to shoot/RDM you, and do not punch minge or initiate arguments to harass someone. Killing Rules: 1. You may not randomly kill someone without proper roleplay reason. (RDM) 11. You may not kill government authorities for no reason. You may not kill the authorities for simply pulling you over or questioning you. You may not kill the authorities for giving you a lawful order. (Leave the area, put that away, identify yourself, etc.)

Denied. Your "Apology" Is AI generated.

Hello, I was the staff member who issued the ban. The first reason for your ban was because you RDM'd another player. This breaks the following rules: General rule: 2. You must have a valid RP reason to kill someone. You may shoot someone if they damage you with a weapon/vehicle. You may not shoot someone because of their physical appearance, faction or simply because they insulted you. You must give someone a verbal or text warning and allow them 10 seconds to respond before escalating the roleplay. Following this warning, you may kill them if they pull out a weapon. Do not bait someone to shoot/RDM you, and do not punch minge or initiate arguments to harass someone. Killing Rule: 1. You may not randomly kill someone without proper roleplay reason. (RDM) https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/29zNlP5s_vpfCm/JxuPwg7oZ3YI?invite=cr-MSxYNnIsMjA3NjI0ODM5LA In this clip, you just gun down Saito without any roleplay, reasoning, or escalation whatsoever. The second reason for your ban was lying to a member of UA. When you were brought to a sit I asked why you killed Saito. Here was your response: https://imgur.com/a/Z1wpjgD You told a completely different story from what is shown in the clip. That is where you were lying to UA. I gave you multiple chances to just be honest about the situation, but you stuck with your story. You broke the rules, and you have been given a fair punishment for breaking the rules.

Denied. The rule you broke was General rule 2: 2. You must have a valid RP reason to kill someone. You may shoot someone if they damage you with a weapon/vehicle. You may not shoot someone because of their physical appearance, faction or simply because they insulted you. You must give someone a verbal or text warning and allow them 10 seconds to respond before escalating the roleplay. Following this warning, you may kill them if they pull out a weapon. Do not bait someone to shoot/RDM you, and do not punch minge or initiate arguments to harass someone. Now I have highlighted specifically what you broke in this rule. In the clip You only began to open fire when the Vizekanzler said to you, "Lick my balls, tard." It did not seem like you just shot him for hitting your car. [You may not shoot someone because of their physical appearance, faction or simply because they insulted you.] This is also not escalating roleplay either [You must give someone a verbal or text warning and allow them 10 seconds to respond before escalating the roleplay] You just mag dumped the Vizekanzler's car because he hit into you and said to you, "Lick my balls, tard." Where was the escalation in Roleplay here? This whole situation also does not make any sense. Why would a Luftwaffe commissioned officer gun down and kill a member of National High Command who is also the Vice Chancellor of Germany because... he hit into your car and said to you, "Lick my balls, tard."? It's also funny how you shorten this rule to just "You must have a valid RP reason to kill someone. You may shoot someone if they damage you with a weapon/vehicle." So this rule looks in your favour for this situation. You also have four bans this year alone for RDM, which does not really help your case here. This was RDM, and your ban is fair and justified. I'd recommend you read the rules during your ban period to avoid situations like this in the future.

For this PK you were placed under gunpoint by a member of the Luftwaffe but fear RP did not apply under the rule: 8. If you are actively holding a weapon in your hand, FearRP does not apply and you may retaliate (even if it is on safety, E+R) The PK guideline you fell under was the PK Guideline: Dying after initiating a shoot-out If you have any further questions about this PK feel free to DM me on Discord.

Denied. Instead of playing the I got banned for "no reason" card. You can simply admit that you were breaking the rules. And that is why you were banned, and your apology, if it was good enough, would be accepted, and you would be unbanned. Or you can prove that you were not breaking the rules by showing a clip of the situation. Also, for wanting to crash the server, your ban will be extended to a permanent ban, You can make a new ban appeal for that situation in 1 month.

Denied. I'd like to see you get a few more Commissioned officer characters and for your main character to at least be an Oberst, before we consider giving you the trusted role. As of right now, with your highest ranking character being a Hauptmann, you do not need the trusted role.

Thank you @Xanfor posting the fix to this bug. If this bug fix does not work for you feel free to dm me on Discord for further help.

Denied. You may make a new ban appeal in 1 month. In your next appeal, instead of playing the "I did nothing wrong" card, and making claims that members of staff are abusing and taking their own sits and denying their own PK's without any proof provided. You make a simple apology and take some accountability for what you actually did.

Denied. You may make a new ban appeal in 3 months.

Denied. You can reappeal your ban in 1 month. In your next appeal, you can be completely honest about what actually happened, you can explain that you were banned because you attempted to use an alt account to bypass your original ban. Then your next ban appeal will more than likely be accepted.

Denied.

Accepted.

Denied. Your "apology" Is AI generated. You may not make another ban appeal for the remaining time on this current ban.

Denied. In the two clips provided for your PK, you were very clearly placed under fear RP. In the two different fear RP situations, you failed to abide by fear RP not once but twice and died both times. This puts you under the PK guideline: Being killed while not abiding by Fear-RP [PK] This PK was also approved by a member of UA which then also puts you under the PK guideline: On approval of UA+ [PK] This PK was justified. If you have any further questions about your PK, feel free to reach out to me on Discord.