All Activity

Hey hey hey, I'm sure a lot of people who are new to the server wonder why the kits/weapons used by their faction aren't something they just 'spawn' with, and instead have to go to a vendor each time and spend their own money to purchase and use them. There are a multitude of reasons for this: 1. If you just spawned with the kit each time, it wouldn't be an item within the NutScript framework and therefore wouldn't be in your inventory when you spawn. This would prevent weapons from being stripped off you, as the restraints system requires you to access another player's inventory and take the weapon from there. 2. During active conflicts, money is a real factor. This prevents civil wars from lasting forever, as eventually one side will run out of money. It also forces generals to pick their fights a little more carefully. No general is going to waste their limited budget on a raid that will gain nothing for their faction. (Ideally) At the end of the day, it is the responsibility of your command to ensure money is distributed throughout the ranks. Of course, this system isn't perfect, which is why there are other ways to earn money, such as fishing, mining, or just taking a bribe . However, good command should ensure their personnel are properly funded to carry out their day-to-day duties. In regards to weapon prices within the vendor, that is something handled in character, with specific characters being responsible for the supply of firearms within vendors. While some item prices are controlled by Upper Administration, and yes, they can be changed at will, doing so would mean a price decrease for every faction, not just the NYPD. This would then defeat the points I made earlier regarding active conflicts and civil wars. Hopefully, this helps answer your questions. I only decided to respond because I noticed this had been left open for a while. Enjoy!

+1 Plays by the rules, generally a clean dude with a solid reputation.

+1 always putting in work, great RP, I always see him around the city on staff and in RP. I think he would be a great staff member

+1

+1 Prometheus staff doesn't have enough asian staff some diversity is needed

+1 good rp and just a good guy in general

+1 Been around as rong as the emperor

+1 great honor

+1 Fantastic civilian roleplay, has followed the rules throughout a lengthy time on the server, I fully endorse Mr. Zen'in!

guess i really was a faggot back then

Please follow the correct template. Name: (depending on character its Ho Li Chit) SteamID32: 76561198435876850 Staff Member who issued the Flag Blacklist: Richard (not his fault he was told to) Explain why your flags were blacklisted: No clue apparently it was ordered back in April of this year. Explain why your flags should be unblacklisted: IVe been roleplaying with my tools in different situations within the server I should be allow them back. Additional Information: Hopefully I can have them back ive been chillin in the new city and havin fun

+1 Great RP'er and is very well known! Have only had good interactions with this man!! Seems to understand the duties pretty well and would be a solid addition!

+1 Solid rp and well know I would say.

Introduction Information Section Steam Name: Shook SteamID32 (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:207879818 Discord Username/ID: shook1416 Timezone: GMT Age: 23 Time Played (check with !time): 1w 2d 23m Your current rank(User/Donator/Trusted): Donator Do you have a mic & will you use it?: Yes Are you consistently active on the forums and server?: Yes Did anyone from the Recruitment Team assist you in making your application?: Kurti Staff Recommendations (Sponsors will be asked to verify): Sharkbait, Kurti, Frosty, Redpug, Chase, Robert Basic Information Section IC Character names, ranks, and brief overview of their duties/everyday activities in a list format: My main character is Hiroshi Zen'in, he is the boss of the Shirohebi Syndicate and runs Zen'in Towers, City Wok & the Red room. I roleplay as a Japanese businessman and help run my many businesses with my 80 ish employee's. How long have you been roleplaying?: I've played on the server we do not speak of for the past 3-4 years and owned multiple factions on there before coming here. Have you received any infractions i.e Notes/Bans? If so, what were they for and what could you have done to prevent getting them next time?: I don't have any bans or notes. Staff Knowledge Section What previous experience so you have as a staff member either within Garry’s Mod or the Nutscript Gamemode? I've been staff for 2+ years on a darkrp server prior and know how to execute all the commands and how the staffing scripts work generally. I was also super admin of a developing server and helped write the rules page, set up NPC's and set up whitelists. Why do you believe we should pick you for the Prometheus Networks Staff Team?[300 words or more]: I believe i would be a useful member to the Prometheus staff team due to my Experience, RP, Commitment and Understanding of the rules and responsibilities. As stated above I have lots of experience in general staffing on different servers and know how to conduct myself in an appropriate manor. I also have experience writing rules, setting up NPC's and whitelists when i was a super admin for a growing server, I believe this experience would help when I'm setting up lockers for people or whitelisting them to certain factions. I have lots of experience in RP, i believe this will help me in knowing how to maintain a good quality of RP as i will know when it is appropriate to pull someone to the sit area without breaking an active RP scenario. This experience in RP will also help me in knowing what is considered failrp or NITRP and will help me enforce the servers rules on the individuals who do not intend on RP'ing appropriately. I am quite committed to this server and intend on being around for a long time, I have acquired a faction along with multiple properties which i have maintained for multiple weeks already, my businesses have websites which we have worked hard on to ensure it adds to the RP experience of interacting with our organisation and businesses. I believe I have a good understanding for the rules and duties my role would require, I have had plenty of experience on staffing as a whole and what appropriate RP and gameplay looks like on this server. In my time on the server I have not received one ban and I believe myself and my businesses are quite well known across the city, i believe this shows that i am capable of RP'ing in a proper manor and am good at interacting well with others which would help me in staffing duties. What are the duties and responsibilities of the position you are applying for in your own words? [150 Words or more]: I believe the duties and responsibilities I will be incurring will pertain as such; Ensuring a level of RP and professionalism is kept throughout the server, handling rulebreakers and people who do not intend to RP properly, Helping the community by answering questions, Handling tickets to whitelist or taking tickets to add lockers, keys or deal with rule breaks. I am aware that if i were to become a staff member i would be representing the server and the staff team and my actions would reflect that. I would ensure to be as helpful as possible and aid the servers growth and RP as best as i can. I believe what I should be looking for is those who do not intend to roleplay/play appropriately, those who simply slip up or accidentally break a rule should be warned but not punished extremely, our duty as a staff member is to maintain and uphold the RP and gameplay quality, not to simply punish everyone who makes a mistake. Notes:

Your Name: idfk but my steam name is France greatest soldier SteamID (STEAM_0:X:XXX): STEAM_0:0:739397257 Appeal Type (Apology or Dispute): apology? Which staff member banned you?: Whoreson How long is your ban for?: Perma Why were you banned?: Being a faggot Why do you deserve to be unbanned?: because everyone is a faggot and if everyone is a faggot no one is Additional Information: i don't even remember what i did so i got no clue what it even is i am appealing. im not a faggot though

Please follow the correct template. Name: SteamID32: Staff Member who issued the Flag Blacklist: Explain why your flags were blacklisted: Explain why your flags should be unblacklisted: Additional Information:

I had my PET tag perms revoked for something that was ordered back in april? Ive been in server many times as of resent and been using them for RP scenes and such. So i wonder if I can have my perms back so i can resume the RP and such

For context, on that day we had received news and reports that members of the NYPD were attempting to attack the base again after a day of attempted attacks. And of course, it happened again. They attacked the side entrance and even came to the front door, threatening to kill a member of the 91st if the feldmarshall did not appear. And again they came with the intention of "talking," and suddenly I heard one of the guys lockpicking the front door. And that's when I had to shoot because otherwise they would have come in. i dont have a clip cuz tbh i didnt think i was gonna be banned just for defending my base.

I am going to be completely honest here, because at this point I am becoming increasingly frustrated with how this appeal is being handled. After reading your response, I am struggling to understand what exactly you have reviewed and how you have arrived at the conclusion that my ban should remain in place. You state that you have reviewed the discussion, the logs, and my notes, yet your response does not address a single one of the inconsistencies I have brought up. Instead, you have chosen to focus on my track record and whether I personally convince you that I deserve to be unbanned. With all due respect, this is not supposed to be about whether I personally convince you that I deserve another chance. It is supposed to be about whether the punishment was justified in the first place. Those are two very different things, and I would appreciate it if that distinction were actually acknowledged. Let's address Maverick's statements, since those seem to be the foundation of this entire situation. Maverick claims that I was supposedly going around shooting people for no reason. Where is the evidence of this? Which players did I allegedly shoot? At what time did these incidents occur? Are there logs or clips demonstrating that I was responsible? I have repeatedly stated that I was at the military base and remained there. There was only one other person there besides me, so I would genuinely like to understand how this accusation is supposed to correspond with what actually happened. Then there is the rooftop allegation. Maverick specifically says, and I quote, "I saw you shooting people from a rooftop too i believe." I have already directly addressed this. I WAS NOT ON A ROOFTOP. I asked for a clip because I want to see what this accusation is based on. Instead of receiving footage or any meaningful clarification, I am now being told that I need to find my own evidence to defend myself. How am I supposed to provide footage disproving an incident that I maintain never happened? Surely the person making the allegation, or the staff member relying on it, should be able to provide something to substantiate it. Furthermore, Maverick openly admits that he is unsure whether I was responsible for the alleged LTAP, stating that he does not know if it was me or someone else. Why is this even being brought into the discussion? If the staff member responsible for the original punishment cannot confidently identify who committed an alleged violation, then it should not be treated as something that reflects negatively on me. Uncertainty is not evidence, and someone else's potential misconduct should not become part of my disciplinary record. Regarding my microphone, I have already acknowledged that it was malfunctioning. I was asked to fix it, and I did. I am not denying that there was an issue. However, I fail to see how a microphone malfunction, which I addressed when requested, somehow contributes to proving the much more serious allegations being made against me. Now, regarding your response specifically: You mention that you have reviewed the logs, but you have not actually explained what those logs demonstrate. You mention my track record, but you have not explained how it establishes that I committed any of the specific violations being discussed. You say that you are not personally convinced that my ban should be shortened or overturned, but you have not provided a single concrete explanation addressing why the original accusations should be considered substantiated. Frankly, this is an extremely disappointing way to handle an appeal. A staff member's personal impression of someone should never take precedence over the actual evidence surrounding a punishment. Having a previous disciplinary history does not automatically make every future accusation true. I should not have to spend the entirety of this appeal fighting against assumptions about my character instead of being given the opportunity to address the actual allegations. What makes this even more frustrating is that you are asking ME to provide clips and witnesses while seemingly overlooking the fact that the original staff member should have been able to substantiate the accusations that resulted in my punishment. The burden should not be shifted onto the person appealing simply because staff cannot provide a clear explanation of their own allegations. I am not asking you to take my word as absolute truth. I am asking you to demonstrate that the decision being made is based on something more substantial than recollections, assumptions, and personal opinions. If you have reviewed the logs, then please explain which specific logs support which specific accusations. If there is footage of me shooting people, provide it. If there is footage of me on a rooftop, provide it. If there is evidence that I resisted detainment, explain precisely what happened and when. If there is no definitive evidence identifying me as the person responsible for the alleged LTAP, then stop bringing it up as though it establishes anything about my conduct. I would also like to know whether you have actually questioned Maverick about these inconsistencies or simply accepted his recollection of events without further verification. Because from the outside, it genuinely looks like the accusations have been accepted at face value, while my responses have barely been acknowledged. I find it particularly ironic that I am being asked to provide evidence to make my case more convincing when I have already identified specific allegations that appear to be based on uncertainty and have explicitly requested the evidence behind them. That request has still not been meaningfully addressed. At this point, I would like both you and Maverick to provide an actual explanation rather than continuing to go in circles. I expect answers to the following: What specific evidence demonstrates that I was randomly shooting players? Where is the footage supporting the claim that I was shooting people from a rooftop? What exactly am I alleged to have done while supposedly resisting detainment? What evidence establishes that I was responsible for the alleged LTAP, considering Maverick himself admitted he was unsure? Which specific logs have you reviewed, and what do they demonstrate? Have these allegations been independently investigated, or has the appeal simply relied on the original staff member's recollection? How exactly does my previous track record establish that the specific allegations in this case are true? I do not think these are unreasonable questions. They are the absolute bare minimum I would expect to be answered when someone is being punished and is attempting to appeal that punishment. I would strongly suggest that the staff involved take another look at this situation, because the way this appeal has been addressed so far does not inspire confidence in the quality or impartiality of the review process. I am genuinely tired of having to repeatedly explain the same things while receiving responses that avoid the actual points being raised. If the evidence exists, show it. If the allegations are substantiated, explain how. If they are not, then I expect that to be acknowledged rather than having assumptions continuously used against me. I am not asking for a favour, special treatment, or an unearned second chance. I am asking for a fair and evidence-based review. That should not be an unreasonable expectation, and it certainly should not require me to repeatedly ask staff to substantiate the accusations they are using to justify keeping me banned. I would appreciate an actual response addressing the points above, rather than another statement about my track record, your personal opinion of whether I deserve to be unbanned, or a request for me to somehow prove that allegations without supporting evidence never happened. Thank you for your time, and I sincerely hope you have an absolutely wonderful day! I also hope that, perhaps next time, a little more time and attention can be dedicated to actually reviewing the allegations, examining the evidence, and addressing the concerns being raised rather than relying on personal impressions, vague recollections, and an individual's previous track record. I understand that thoroughly investigating something may be considerably more demanding than writing a paragraph explaining why you personally don't feel someone deserves an unban, but I would like to believe that this is not too much to expect from the people entrusted with handling disciplinary appeals. I would also like to thank Maverick for providing such a wonderfully detailed recollection of events, particularly the parts where he apparently isn't entirely sure whether I was involved, but somehow those uncertainties have still managed to become part of the discussion surrounding my punishment. Truly reassuring. Hopefully, both of you will find the time to revisit this appeal and provide something a little more substantial than what has been presented so far. A proper explanation, actual evidence, and answers to the questions raised would be a refreshing change of pace. Until then, I will eagerly await a response that addresses the substance of this appeal rather than another beautifully worded explanation of why my previous track record apparently makes evidence and due consideration optional. Once again, have a wonderful day! I certainly hope the remainder of it goes considerably better than this appeal review has.

But i recommend creating a new one.

Once you reach a week of in game time. not a week of waiting. just submit a new one once you have a week of play time in game. If you want you can use the same one.

Can I repost the same app after one week, If thats cool with y'all.

It's been a week, I guess it didn't say It's been a week in game, I'll wait a week ig

Appeal accepted. Your character will be unpk'd.